Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post a reply

:
In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed below into the text field underneath.
Smilies
:header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :canny: :nelix: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :cuppaT: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :link: :cronos: :whogives: :dafinger: :Lucia: :pukeup: :Hiya: :paranoid: :bored: :gigglesnshit: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :brickwall: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Frankly » Sun Jun 25, 2017 4:17 pm

Guest wrote:
Frankly wrote:There's been another 'car incident', this one during Eid prayers! Six injured. Thankfully, no one was killed.

They are saying it's not terrorist related, but it's a bit of a coincidence given who the victims were!

http://news.sky.com/story/vehicle-hits- ... e-10926595


Read your own link before jumping to conclusions.
You sound like you want it to be deliberate just so you can condemn non islamists....


:dunno: No, that wasn't the case at all? Only that it was so similar to what had happened recently, that's all, but you are right, I didn't read the whole article. :oops:

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Guest » Sun Jun 25, 2017 3:49 pm

Frankly wrote:There's been another 'car incident', this one during Eid prayers! Six injured. Thankfully, no one was killed.

They are saying it's not terrorist related, but it's a bit of a coincidence given who the victims were!

http://news.sky.com/story/vehicle-hits- ... e-10926595


Read your own link before jumping to conclusions.
You sound like you want it to be deliberate just so you can condemn non islamists....

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Stooo » Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:28 pm

Si_Crewe wrote:
Frankly wrote:There's been another 'car incident', this one during Eid prayers! Six injured. Thankfully, no one was killed.

They are saying it's not terrorist related, but it's a bit of a coincidence given who the victims were!

http://news.sky.com/story/vehicle-hits- ... e-10926595


The driver was a muslim woman who'd been participating in the celebrations.


And obviously a shit driver...

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Frankly » Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:19 pm

Si_Crewe wrote:
Frankly wrote:There's been another 'car incident', this one during Eid prayers! Six injured. Thankfully, no one was killed.

They are saying it's not terrorist related, but it's a bit of a coincidence given who the victims were!

http://news.sky.com/story/vehicle-hits- ... e-10926595


The driver was a muslim woman who'd been participating in the celebrations.


Cheers Si. Yes, I've just seen that in the updated news.

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Si_Crewe » Sun Jun 25, 2017 11:37 am

Frankly wrote:There's been another 'car incident', this one during Eid prayers! Six injured. Thankfully, no one was killed.

They are saying it's not terrorist related, but it's a bit of a coincidence given who the victims were!

http://news.sky.com/story/vehicle-hits- ... e-10926595


The driver was a muslim woman who'd been participating in the celebrations.

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Frankly » Sun Jun 25, 2017 11:02 am

There's been another 'car incident', this one during Eid prayers! Six injured. Thankfully, no one was killed.

They are saying it's not terrorist related, but it's a bit of a coincidence given who the victims were!

http://news.sky.com/story/vehicle-hits- ... e-10926595

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Stooo » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:57 pm

Punk wrote:The cartoon summed up the lies printed by those two fake news rags perfectly. Some idiot believed the rubbish and thought he would do some damage to reclaim the streets. :off head:


At that time of night they're reclaiming the streets from the council cleaning gangs.

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Punk » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:34 pm

The cartoon summed up the lies printed by those two fake news rags perfectly. Some idiot believed the rubbish and thought he would do some damage to reclaim the streets. :off head:

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Stooo » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:31 pm

Si_Crewe wrote:
Stooo wrote:lol


Meh,

I didn't even bother reading that.

Persumably it was a load of wordy shite about how sickening the Granduia are when they're willing to stoop to those depths to make a jibe at a competitor.

If that's the case, I agree completely. That Ganiuard cartoon was an utter fucking disgrace.
What's more, you fucking-well know that if the Mail had published a cartoon of, say, the Manchester attack which showed the bomber reading the Guarnida you'd be critical of it.


Let's see if they do...

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by McAz » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:24 pm

Punk wrote:
McAz wrote:
Punk wrote:One only has to read the comments section on Mail political stories to confirm that the level of brightness is rather low.

True - but the Mail's fuss over bugger all may just cause a few of its readers to overcome their fear of real newspapers with long words and reason and actually try the Guardian. It's rarely a good idea to give yards of free advertising to a rival.


Mail readers would only buy The Guardian if it started running fake news stories about immigrants, the EU, bogus Asylum Seekers etc :cheers:


Yes, of course - what was I thinking? :gigglesnshit:

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Si_Crewe » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:04 pm

Stooo wrote:lol


Meh,

I didn't even bother reading that.

Persumably it was a load of wordy shite about how sickening the Granduia are when they're willing to stoop to those depths to make a jibe at a competitor.

If that's the case, I agree completely. That Ganiuard cartoon was an utter fucking disgrace.
What's more, you fucking-well know that if the Mail had published a cartoon of, say, the Manchester attack which showed the bomber reading the Guarnida you'd be critical of it.

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Punk » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:53 pm

Stooo wrote:
McAz wrote:
Punk wrote:One only has to read the comments section on Mail political stories to confirm that the level of brightness is rather low.

True - but the Mail's fuss over bugger all may just cause a few of its readers to overcome their fear of real newspapers with long words and reason and actually try the Guardian. It's rarely a good idea to give yards of free advertising to a rival.


Not going to happen when they get diversions like this:

Earlier this week, a Guardian writer attacked the Daily Mail for carrying comments by the controversialist Katie Hopkins. That was a lie. The Guardian and its writer know that Ms Hopkins has nothing to do with the Daily Mail, but works for Mail Online — a totally separate entity that has its own publisher, its own readership, different content and a very different world view.


Yes the print Mail is anti-porn but MailOnline is almost soft core porn :smilin:

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Stooo » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:45 pm

McAz wrote:
Punk wrote:One only has to read the comments section on Mail political stories to confirm that the level of brightness is rather low.

True - but the Mail's fuss over bugger all may just cause a few of its readers to overcome their fear of real newspapers with long words and reason and actually try the Guardian. It's rarely a good idea to give yards of free advertising to a rival.


Not going to happen when they get diversions like this:

Earlier this week, a Guardian writer attacked the Daily Mail for carrying comments by the controversialist Katie Hopkins. That was a lie. The Guardian and its writer know that Ms Hopkins has nothing to do with the Daily Mail, but works for Mail Online — a totally separate entity that has its own publisher, its own readership, different content and a very different world view.

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by Punk » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:43 pm

McAz wrote:
Punk wrote:One only has to read the comments section on Mail political stories to confirm that the level of brightness is rather low.

True - but the Mail's fuss over bugger all may just cause a few of its readers to overcome their fear of real newspapers with long words and reason and actually try the Guardian. It's rarely a good idea to give yards of free advertising to a rival.


Mail readers would only buy The Guardian if it started running fake news stories about immigrants, the EU, bogus Asylum Seekers etc :cheers:

Re: Terrorist attack in Finsbury Park

Post by McAz » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:38 pm

Punk wrote:One only has to read the comments section on Mail political stories to confirm that the level of brightness is rather low.

True - but the Mail's fuss over bugger all may just cause a few of its readers to overcome their fear of real newspapers with long words and reason and actually try the Guardian. It's rarely a good idea to give yards of free advertising to a rival.

Top