Jihadi Jack.

Post a reply


This question is a means of identifying and preventing automated submissions.
Smilies
eyebrow :header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :canny: :nelix: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :cuppaT: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :link: :cronos: :whogives: :dafinger: :Lucia: :pukeup: :Hiya: :paranoid: :bored: :gigglesnshit: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :brickwall: :artist: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Jihadi Jack.

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Vicks » Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:25 pm

Let Jack rot wrote:Jail the parents and let the traitor terrorist deluded Muslim coward rot in a foreign land.
His parents are shameless to demand this country lets 'It's back. How many innocents has he murdered?


His parents need a fucking good slap.

How dare they criticise the British Government for doing nothing to help their precious son.

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Let Jack rot » Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:01 pm

Jail the parents and let the traitor terrorist deluded Muslim coward rot in a foreign land.
His parents are shameless to demand this country lets 'It's back. How many innocents has he murdered?

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Richard » Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:35 am

This deluded nutcase lost his u.k rights when he betrayed his country to a sick and evil cause that would see the end of any humanity and kindness. His parents just make it worse with their moronic lies. He's a traitor, a terrorist and a coward.
I hope he is dead already and the parents should be jailed or better deported.

Rot in pieces jihardi Jack.

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Mark » Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:28 pm

Rocthedog wrote:
Mark wrote:Oils fair in love and war.............more like

and as "we" helped create this situation, we should at least take care of any "Brits" who joined IS.........
ideally, those still out there, kill them all on the battlefield
as for the 400 odd who have returned
they should ALL be locked up forever.
as they will ALWAYS be a danger to us UK citizens

we should demand this of our "rulers"
then we should demand that "we" keep out of any of the ME "conflicts"
the age of aggressive conquest must surely end soon
the EU is proof that financial conquest is as effective, which is still rollox as its still Empire building
but at least the death toll will be less, and it may even slow down the production of so many nasty wannabe murdering terrorists


I agree, Put them down on the battlefield or elsewhere . About letting them back ( Too Late Now 400 are back ) if the stories we read are true. We are gonna house and give them money. What a Fucking Joke the well protected politicians are in this country.


that's better

its all just more divide and rule rollox Roc
lets these animals roam among us, remove more of their (and our) rights for our own protection
keep stirring the pot with more fear anger and hatred
et viola

continued enslavement of the masses
who are too distracted to unite and fling out the corrupt who rule us

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Rocthedog » Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:21 pm

Mark wrote:Oils fair in love and war.............more like

and as "we" helped create this situation, we should at least take care of any "Brits" who joined IS.........
ideally, those still out there, kill them all on the battlefield
as for the 400 odd who have returned
they should ALL be locked up forever.
as they will ALWAYS be a danger to us UK citizens

we should demand this of our "rulers"
then we should demand that "we" keep out of any of the ME "conflicts"
the age of aggressive conquest must surely end soon
the EU is proof that financial conquest is as effective, which is still rollox as its still Empire building
but at least the death toll will be less, and it may even slow down the production of so many nasty wannabe murdering terrorists


I agree, Put them down on the battlefield or elsewhere . About letting them back ( Too Late Now 400 are back ) if the stories we read are true. We are gonna house and give them money. What a Fucking Joke the politicians are in this country.

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Mark » Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:38 pm

Oils fair in love and war.............more like

and as "we" helped create this situation, we should at least take care of any "Brits" who joined IS.........
ideally, those still out there, kill them all on the battlefield
as for the 400 odd who have returned
they should ALL be locked up forever.
as they will ALWAYS be a danger to us UK citizens

we should demand this of our "rulers"
then we should demand that "we" keep out of any of the ME "conflicts"
the age of aggressive conquest must surely end soon
the EU is proof that financial conquest is as effective, which is still rollox as its still Empire building
but at least the death toll will be less, and it may even slow down the production of so many nasty wannabe murdering terrorists

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Guest » Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:52 am

Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
Rolluplostinspace wrote:
Guest wrote:[quote="Puzzler"

People seem to have forgotten that William Hague Foreign Secretary at the time gave £27.5 m of UK Tax Payers money (Humanitarian Aid) to ISIS Rebels and was instrumental in withdrawing the Arms Embargo which allowed the British and US Intelligence supply them with arms to try and overthrow the Assad Regime.

Regime, now there's an emotive word.
Assad government is more realistic.
Assad government that the vast majority of Syrians have always supported.
Western governments would love that level of support from the people but never ever have achieved it.
The vast majority still support Assad.


I am not an ISIS Supporter, but I think there is something Morally wrong that this Country and the USA have given vast sums of money and arms to support them to overthrow Assad, only to find that ISIS have their own agenda
Its all down to the "War for oil"

I don’t agree with the Tory and Democrat governments who funded ISIS any more than you do. That doesn’t mean we should welcome the subhuman filth back, and yes guest that includes the white converts who went there.


Those that volunteered to do the "Dirty Work" go out and fight with the rebels, are considered subhuman and should not be allowed back in the Country, but those Government officials who "brokered" the deal and conspired to allow it to happen are " Nice Guys" and still retain their position in the UK and US Governments
At the moment we have RAF teams in the Nevada Desert sending in Drones and killing thousands of Civilians.

As they say "Alls fair in love and War "

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Puzzler » Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:42 pm

Guest wrote:
Rolluplostinspace wrote:
Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Keyser wrote:He made his bed - let him fucking lie in it now.

The same goes for this lying bastard on Sky News today. :brickwall:

http://news.sky.com/story/shabazz-sulem ... e-11105793

Ultra liberals - ‘So they’ve cut off a few heads and raped a couple of sex slaves, but they’re still British and deserve the same human rights as us’. People like guest make me sick to the fucking core.


People seem to have forgotten that William Hague Foreign Secretary at the time gave £27.5 m of UK Tax Payers money (Humanitarian Aid) to ISIS Rebels and was instrumental in withdrawing the Arms Embargo which allowed the British and US Intelligence supply them with arms to try and overthrow the Assad Regime.

Regime, now there's an emotive word.
Assad government is more realistic.
Assad government that the vast majority of Syrians have always supported.
Western governments would love that level of support from the people but never ever have achieved it.
The vast majority still support Assad.


I am not an ISIS Supporter, but I think there is something Morally wrong that this Country and the USA have given vast sums of money and arms to support them to overthrow Assad, only to find that ISIS have their own agenda
Its all down to the "War for oil"

I don’t agree with the Tory and Democrat governments who funded ISIS any more than you do. That doesn’t mean we should welcome the subhuman filth back, and yes guest that includes the white converts who went there.

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Rolluplostinspace » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:12 pm

I think it's down to the speech by George Bush regarding the axis of evil.
Meaning The Greater Israel Project where there will only be Israel in the middle east with power and the rest will be small tribes and statelets with no power whatsoever.
Also central banking with only North Korea and Iran left on the list for destruction as told to us over a dozen years ago by General Wesley Clark >>>>>

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Guest » Wed Nov 01, 2017 1:18 pm

Rolluplostinspace wrote:
Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Keyser wrote:He made his bed - let him fucking lie in it now.

The same goes for this lying bastard on Sky News today. :brickwall:

http://news.sky.com/story/shabazz-sulem ... e-11105793

Ultra liberals - ‘So they’ve cut off a few heads and raped a couple of sex slaves, but they’re still British and deserve the same human rights as us’. People like guest make me sick to the fucking core.


People seem to have forgotten that William Hague Foreign Secretary at the time gave £27.5 m of UK Tax Payers money (Humanitarian Aid) to ISIS Rebels and was instrumental in withdrawing the Arms Embargo which allowed the British and US Intelligence supply them with arms to try and overthrow the Assad Regime.

Regime, now there's an emotive word.
Assad government is more realistic.
Assad government that the vast majority of Syrians have always supported.
Western governments would love that level of support from the people but never ever have achieved it.
The vast majority still support Assad.


I am not an ISIS Supporter, but I think there is something Morally wrong that this Country and the USA have given vast sums of money and arms to support them to overthrow Assad, only to find that ISIS have their own agenda
Its all down to the "War for oil"

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Rolluplostinspace » Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:50 pm

Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Keyser wrote:He made his bed - let him fucking lie in it now.

The same goes for this lying bastard on Sky News today. :brickwall:

http://news.sky.com/story/shabazz-sulem ... e-11105793

Ultra liberals - ‘So they’ve cut off a few heads and raped a couple of sex slaves, but they’re still British and deserve the same human rights as us’. People like guest make me sick to the fucking core.


People seem to have forgotten that William Hague Foreign Secretary at the time gave £27.5 m of UK Tax Payers money (Humanitarian Aid) to ISIS Rebels and was instrumental in withdrawing the Arms Embargo which allowed the British and US Intelligence supply them with arms to try and overthrow the Assad Regime.

Regime, now there's an emotive word.
Assad government is more realistic.
Assad government that the vast majority of Syrians have always supported.
Western governments would love that level of support from the people but never ever have achieved it.
The vast majority still support Assad.

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Guest » Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:39 pm

Puzzler wrote:
Keyser wrote:He made his bed - let him fucking lie in it now.

The same goes for this lying bastard on Sky News today. :brickwall:

http://news.sky.com/story/shabazz-sulem ... e-11105793

Ultra liberals - ‘So they’ve cut off a few heads and raped a couple of sex slaves, but they’re still British and deserve the same human rights as us’. People like guest make me sick to the fucking core.


People seem to have forgotten that William Hague Foreign Secretary at the time gave £27.5 m of UK Tax Payers money (Humanitarian Aid) to ISIS Rebels and was instrumental in withdrawing the Arms Embargo which allowed the British and US Intelligence supply them with arms to try and overthrow the Assad Regime.

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Keyser » Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:27 pm

Puzzler wrote:
Keyser wrote:He made his bed - let him fucking lie in it now.

The same goes for this lying bastard on Sky News today. :brickwall:

http://news.sky.com/story/shabazz-sulem ... e-11105793

Ultra liberals - ‘So they’ve cut off a few heads and raped a couple of sex slaves, but they’re still British and deserve the same human rights as us’. People like guest make me sick to the fucking core.


There will actually be people who believe his story as well Puzz - it's incredible. :shake head:

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Puzzler » Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:50 pm

Keyser wrote:He made his bed - let him fucking lie in it now.

The same goes for this lying bastard on Sky News today. :brickwall:

http://news.sky.com/story/shabazz-sulem ... e-11105793

Ultra liberals - ‘So they’ve cut off a few heads and raped a couple of sex slaves, but they’re still British and deserve the same human rights as us’. People like guest make me sick to the fucking core.

Re: Jihadi Jack.

Post by Puzzler » Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:48 pm

Guest wrote:
Major Starbold wrote:Let him rot in the hell hole I hope he is in.

We could allow him back if Canary would let him doss at her pad and be responsible for him, that in itself would be a severe harsh punishment and deterrent to others. :shoot: :shoot: :shoot:


The UK should be responsible for him, it was our British Intelligence that helped to arm ISIS along with financial help from the Government and the USA.

He has done what British Intelligence wanted him to do, so he should not be abandoned

It can live in your house if you love it so much. Personally I think the people who he’s no doubt helped commit atrocities against should decide his fate, not ISIS apologist dhimmi scum like yourself. Have a fucking word with yourself, they make Al Qaeda and the Taliban look tame for fucks sake.

Top