Dogs Sleeping Forum

Guest wrote:

McAz wrote:We're straying here too closely to the notion that murder requires mental illness - it does not.

No it does not but that is the current label given to those terrorist that drive a car through a crowd of people

McAz wrote:Hiya Puzz.

McAz wrote:We're straying here too closely to the notion that murder requires mental illness - it does not.

3rdLeg wrote:[
Cope very well thank you, white, brown, yellow or black, Christian, Muslim, Hindu or Buddhist, makes no difference, cunts the lot of them and should burn for thier atrocities.

Problem here is, the likes of you will look at the persons religion to determin is said person qualifies as a terrorist.

I agree with a previous post, to act in such a dispicable way you would need to be mentally ill, reardless of faith.
But to the rabid mob on here, if the perpetrator is a christian then he must be ill, have a grudge etc, and therefore can't be a terrorist.

Viper wrote:

3rdLeg wrote:

Red Okktober wrote:

3rdLeg wrote:Only in my head.. ok ya dill.. that fucker in Virginia in the US, the white fella, plowed through all those people, called a terrorist? No.. say i'm wrong? You get a muslim behind the wheel, what would the the likes of you be screaming?

Black, brown or white, should be treated the same, if you are mentally ill, you are ill and not labelled because of the colour of your skin. All to easy otherwise. IF you think i am condoning these kind of acts then just read back in the thread you fucking idiot.

Try posting as your real alias instead.

I don't suppose those injured give a shit whether the perp was 'called a terrorist' or not.

It's been mentioned many, many times, that to commit an acts of terrorism, you have to be mentally ill in the first place, at the very least, severely brainwashed.

I don't know why people like you try to play these incidents down with your apologetic cries of "it wasn't terrorism, he was mentally ill" - what fucking difference does it make?

Rather than split hairs over whether he was a terrorist or mentally ill, I prefer the term that covers both possibilities - 'Death by Muslim'

Obviously you never read my previous posts. My point being and i ain't wrong, a white person doing this would have to be mentally ill, however a central asian or ME person would be labelled a terrorist regardless if mentally ill or not. THIS IS FACT and shown repeatedly in the media when such atrocities occur.

There are no apologies in my posts unless me wanting that fucker to "Burn" is an apology? Like i said, read it all before you comment.

I personally find too much anger in your overly long posts so do not read them all. It doesnt suprise me if you are finding others do the same.

Calm posting is the goal.

3rdLeg wrote:

Guest wrote:I wonder how 3rdleg copes when a white Muslim terrorist carries out an attack?

Cope very well thank you, white, brown, yellow or black, Christian, Muslim, Hindu or Buddhist, makes no difference, cunts the lot of them and should burn for thier atrocities.

Problem here is, the likes of you will look at the persons religion to determin is said person qualifies as a terrorist.

I agree with a previous post, to act in such a dispicable way you would need to be mentally ill, reardless of faith.

But to the rabid mob on here, if the perpetrator is a christian then he must be ill, have a grudge etc, and therefore can't be a terrorist.

Viper wrote:

3rdLeg wrote:

Red Okktober wrote:

3rdLeg wrote:Only in my head.. ok ya dill.. that fucker in Virginia in the US, the white fella, plowed through all those people, called a terrorist? No.. say i'm wrong? You get a muslim behind the wheel, what would the the likes of you be screaming?

Black, brown or white, should be treated the same, if you are mentally ill, you are ill and not labelled because of the colour of your skin. All to easy otherwise. IF you think i am condoning these kind of acts then just read back in the thread you fucking idiot.

Try posting as your real alias instead.

I don't suppose those injured give a shit whether the perp was 'called a terrorist' or not.

It's been mentioned many, many times, that to commit an acts of terrorism, you have to be mentally ill in the first place, at the very least, severely brainwashed.

I don't know why people like you try to play these incidents down with your apologetic cries of "it wasn't terrorism, he was mentally ill" - what fucking difference does it make?

Rather than split hairs over whether he was a terrorist or mentally ill, I prefer the term that covers both possibilities - 'Death by Muslim'

Obviously you never read my previous posts. My point being and i ain't wrong, a white person doing this would have to be mentally ill, however a central asian or ME person would be labelled a terrorist regardless if mentally ill or not. THIS IS FACT and shown repeatedly in the media when such atrocities occur.

There are no apologies in my posts unless me wanting that fucker to "Burn" is an apology? Like i said, read it all before you comment.

I personally find too much anger in your overly long posts so do not read them all. It doesnt suprise me if you are finding others do the same.

Calm posting is the goal.

Guest wrote:I wonder how 3rdleg copes when a white Muslim terrorist carries out an attack?

Dean wrote:

Guest wrote:I wonder how 3rdleg copes when a white Muslim terrorist carries out an attack?

The same way he would if it was a white Christian who carried out an attack, I presume...

Guest wrote:I wonder how 3rdleg copes when a white Muslim terrorist carries out an attack?