43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
Smilies
:gigglesnshit: :eyebrow: :header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :NAA: :canny: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :dafinger: :pukeup: :Hiya: :bored: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Guest » Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:22 pm

Harry Pearce wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Terrance Gavan wrote:The Far Right's whataboutery is a fucking disgrace.
In 2016 there was a 92% rise in white British terrorism offences.
NINETY-TWO FUCKING PERCENT.

How racist. Plus how many of that was Loyalist terrorism? WHITE BRITISH CAN BE MUSLIM TERRORISTS TOO, LOOK AT SALAHUDDIN AND THE WHITE WIDOW YA RACIST CUNT!!!


All nationalist terrorists are loyalists.
I purposely left out one word from my post to see if a sucker would fall for it.
I left out 92% of white British NATIONALISTS
LOL for trying to convince me that Muslim terrorists are gonna target mosques.
:awesome:

So muslim terrorists aren’t clever enough to commit a false flag?


Show us some verified examples of that happening in the UK.


cue tumbleweed

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Harry Pearce » Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:39 pm

Puzzler wrote:
Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Terrance Gavan wrote:The Far Right's whataboutery is a fucking disgrace.
In 2016 there was a 92% rise in white British terrorism offences.
NINETY-TWO FUCKING PERCENT.

How racist. Plus how many of that was Loyalist terrorism? WHITE BRITISH CAN BE MUSLIM TERRORISTS TOO, LOOK AT SALAHUDDIN AND THE WHITE WIDOW YA RACIST CUNT!!!


All nationalist terrorists are loyalists.
I purposely left out one word from my post to see if a sucker would fall for it.
I left out 92% of white British NATIONALISTS
LOL for trying to convince me that Muslim terrorists are gonna target mosques.
:awesome:

So muslim terrorists aren’t clever enough to commit a false flag?


Show us some verified examples of that happening in the UK.

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Puzzler » Sat Feb 17, 2018 12:04 am

Guest wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
Terrance Gavan wrote:The Far Right's whataboutery is a fucking disgrace.
In 2016 there was a 92% rise in white British terrorism offences.
NINETY-TWO FUCKING PERCENT.

How racist. Plus how many of that was Loyalist terrorism? WHITE BRITISH CAN BE MUSLIM TERRORISTS TOO, LOOK AT SALAHUDDIN AND THE WHITE WIDOW YA RACIST CUNT!!!


All nationalist terrorists are loyalists.
I purposely left out one word from my post to see if a sucker would fall for it.
I left out 92% of white British NATIONALISTS
LOL for trying to convince me that Muslim terrorists are gonna target mosques.
:awesome:

So muslim terrorists aren’t clever enough to commit a false flag?

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Guest » Fri Feb 16, 2018 12:08 pm

Puzzler wrote:
Terrance Gavan wrote:The Far Right's whataboutery is a fucking disgrace.
In 2016 there was a 92% rise in white British terrorism offences.
NINETY-TWO FUCKING PERCENT.

How racist. Plus how many of that was Loyalist terrorism? WHITE BRITISH CAN BE MUSLIM TERRORISTS TOO, LOOK AT SALAHUDDIN AND THE WHITE WIDOW YA RACIST CUNT!!!


All nationalist terrorists are loyalists.
I purposely left out one word from my post to see if a sucker would fall for it.
I left out 92% of white British NATIONALISTS
LOL for trying to convince me that Muslim terrorists are gonna target mosques.
:awesome:

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Puzzler » Fri Feb 16, 2018 11:40 am

Terrance Gavan wrote:The Far Right's whataboutery is a fucking disgrace.
In 2016 there was a 92% rise in white British terrorism offences.
NINETY-TWO FUCKING PERCENT.

How racist. Plus how many of that was Loyalist terrorism? WHITE BRITISH CAN BE MUSLIM TERRORISTS TOO, LOOK AT SALAHUDDIN AND THE WHITE WIDOW YA RACIST CUNT!!!

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Terrance Gavan » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:50 pm

The Far Right's whataboutery is a fucking disgrace.
In 2016 there was a 92% rise in white British terrorism offences.
NINETY-TWO FUCKING PERCENT.

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Puzzler » Mon Feb 05, 2018 12:34 am

Accepted - hopefully it doesn’t happen again :thumbsup:

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by McAz » Mon Feb 05, 2018 12:15 am

Puzzler wrote:
McAz wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
McAz wrote:No - if you are now advocating that they should be fairly tried then there is no division between us. Though the death sentence is counter-productive - it creates martyrs.

Thats what I’ve always advocated for :thumbsup:

Good for you then - I apologise if I've misunderstood your position.

How about an apology for calling me scum eh? :thumbsup:


I thought that was a given - but that too. :thumbsup:

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Puzzler » Mon Feb 05, 2018 12:14 am

McAz wrote:
Puzzler wrote:
McAz wrote:No - if you are now advocating that they should be fairly tried then there is no division between us. Though the death sentence is counter-productive - it creates martyrs.

Thats what I’ve always advocated for :thumbsup:

Good for you then - I apologise if I've misunderstood your position.

How about an apology for calling me scum eh? :thumbsup:

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by McAz » Mon Feb 05, 2018 12:13 am

Puzzler wrote:
McAz wrote:No - if you are now advocating that they should be fairly tried then there is no division between us. Though the death sentence is counter-productive - it creates martyrs.

Thats what I’ve always advocated for :thumbsup:

Good for you then - I apologise if I've misunderstood your position.

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Puzzler » Mon Feb 05, 2018 12:10 am

McAz wrote:No - if you are now advocating that they should be fairly tried then there is no division between us. Though the death sentence is counter-productive - it creates martyrs.

Thats what I’ve always advocated for :thumbsup:

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by McAz » Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:43 pm

Guest wrote:
McAz wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:
McAz wrote:["We" can assume what the fuck "we" like - or you can link to any post I've made that makes fun of the dead. Off you trot sunshine. :thumbsup:

(Darren Osborne's supporters thank you for contribution). :wink:


Other than this case, Anders Breivik, and Thomas Mair, ie white terrorists, you've trolled and trivialised every other single terrorist attack, including the Manchester bombing where little girls were blown up.

You even trolled the Grenfell fire thread.

You can shove your extra large coloured font up your vile subhuman troll's arsehole.


So no :link: to me laughing at the dead then? Never mind, you've done what your far-right pals expect of you. :thumbsup:


You dont like to hear it but red has summed you up accurately.


Log in Rocking Horse. :wink:

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by McAz » Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:42 pm

Puzzler wrote:
McAz wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
McAz wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Are you saying that children under the age of 10 have left the UK to join ISIS on their own?


Reports suggest that young children accompanying their parents have gone to the war zones - whether they joined ISIS is another matter. Can children make such choices?


They were taken out of the country by their parents then, they didn't go off to join ISIS. I think you're clutching at straws.

I'm clutching at nothing - simply opposing those who would dispense summary justice.

So me wanting 40 year minimum sentences for all terrorists after their trial is summary justice then. Ideally they’d get the death penalty but that’s not an option anymore.


No - if you are now advocating that they should be fairly tried then there is no division between us. Though the death sentence is counter-productive - it creates martyrs.

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Puzzler » Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:23 pm

McAz wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
McAz wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Are you saying that children under the age of 10 have left the UK to join ISIS on their own?


Reports suggest that young children accompanying their parents have gone to the war zones - whether they joined ISIS is another matter. Can children make such choices?


They were taken out of the country by their parents then, they didn't go off to join ISIS. I think you're clutching at straws.

I'm clutching at nothing - simply opposing those who would dispense summary justice.

So me wanting 40 year minimum sentences for all terrorists after their trial is summary justice then. Ideally they’d get the death penalty but that’s not an option anymore.

Re: 43 Years for Far-Right Terrorist

Post by Guest » Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:07 pm

McAz wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:
McAz wrote:["We" can assume what the fuck "we" like - or you can link to any post I've made that makes fun of the dead. Off you trot sunshine. :thumbsup:

(Darren Osborne's supporters thank you for contribution). :wink:


Other than this case, Anders Breivik, and Thomas Mair, ie white terrorists, you've trolled and trivialised every other single terrorist attack, including the Manchester bombing where little girls were blown up.

You even trolled the Grenfell fire thread.

You can shove your extra large coloured font up your vile subhuman troll's arsehole.


So no :link: to me laughing at the dead then? Never mind, you've done what your far-right pals expect of you. :thumbsup:


You dont like to hear it but red has summed you up accurately.

Top