Dogs Sleeping Forum

Guest wrote:
You don't like it because you reams of bullshit threads and posts, do get called out on here!

Do one uncle Fester!

Didge wrote:

Guest wrote:

Punk wrote:

Didge wrote:

Punk wrote:
Where did I say YOU had mates in Yemen. It stinks of stupidity on your part. It is It's not Its. It stinks of stupidity on your part. Do Anarcho-Syndicalists, which are Socialists, support a totalitarian system? It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure. Is John Lewis a flawed company? Just asking. Also the guest asked you when the Communists were on and your response was that you were talking about the Hard Left and not Communists. It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure.

Anarcho-Syndicalists is a form of socialism, is not Socialism

Doh and yes it would also require Totaluitarianism


You did say their mates, so I guess you mean the Tories. Though has not Labour also been mates with them

No worries, happy to acknowledge i misread

I said for a socialist system to work, has to be totalitarian, and in every example in has been

That is a historical fact

Some nations use elements of Socialism, but never are socialist Governements. The ones that are, always end up being Totalitarian

John Lewis?

WTF. It makes money through capitalism, so that has to be the dumbest point you have made lol

I am sure you stink full stop Cathy

LOL Your knowledge is lacking. Anarcho-Syndicalists are anti-totalitarianism hence Anarcho and John Lewis is a syndicalist company. On the Political compass grid AS's are OPPOSITE to Authoritarianism. How did the Attlee Socialist government of 1945 fail? Was it authoritarian? Why do you spell exactly the same words incorrectly as Viper?

Probably because it is Viper.

This Didge moron had more than one id on the NF forum, then they got wise and deleted his other login(S)

Another one full of paranoia

Why do you post as a guest, when its clear you read newsfix, afraid of your own identity?

Maybe you cannot look in the mirror?

lol that would explain a lot

Man this forum is a hive of the hard left and pipe dreamers in Corbyn

Its hilarious

Guest wrote:

Punk wrote:

Didge wrote:

Punk wrote:
Where did I say YOU had mates in Yemen. It stinks of stupidity on your part. It is It's not Its. It stinks of stupidity on your part. Do Anarcho-Syndicalists, which are Socialists, support a totalitarian system? It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure. Is John Lewis a flawed company? Just asking. Also the guest asked you when the Communists were on and your response was that you were talking about the Hard Left and not Communists. It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure.

Anarcho-Syndicalists is a form of socialism, is not Socialism

Doh and yes it would also require Totaluitarianism


You did say their mates, so I guess you mean the Tories. Though has not Labour also been mates with them

No worries, happy to acknowledge i misread

I said for a socialist system to work, has to be totalitarian, and in every example in has been

That is a historical fact

Some nations use elements of Socialism, but never are socialist Governements. The ones that are, always end up being Totalitarian

John Lewis?

WTF. It makes money through capitalism, so that has to be the dumbest point you have made lol

I am sure you stink full stop Cathy

LOL Your knowledge is lacking. Anarcho-Syndicalists are anti-totalitarianism hence Anarcho and John Lewis is a syndicalist company. On the Political compass grid AS's are OPPOSITE to Authoritarianism. How did the Attlee Socialist government of 1945 fail? Was it authoritarian? Why do you spell exactly the same words incorrectly as Viper?

Probably because it is Viper.

This Didge moron had more than one id on the NF forum, then they got wise and deleted his other login(S)

Punk wrote:

Didge wrote:

Punk wrote:
Where did I say YOU had mates in Yemen. It stinks of stupidity on your part. It is It's not Its. It stinks of stupidity on your part. Do Anarcho-Syndicalists, which are Socialists, support a totalitarian system? It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure. Is John Lewis a flawed company? Just asking. Also the guest asked you when the Communists were on and your response was that you were talking about the Hard Left and not Communists. It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure.

Anarcho-Syndicalists is a form of socialism, is not Socialism

Doh and yes it would also require Totaluitarianism


You did say their mates, so I guess you mean the Tories. Though has not Labour also been mates with them

No worries, happy to acknowledge i misread

I said for a socialist system to work, has to be totalitarian, and in every example in has been

That is a historical fact

Some nations use elements of Socialism, but never are socialist Governements. The ones that are, always end up being Totalitarian

John Lewis?

WTF. It makes money through capitalism, so that has to be the dumbest point you have made lol

I am sure you stink full stop Cathy

LOL Your knowledge is lacking. Anarcho-Syndicalists are anti-totalitarianism hence Anarcho and John Lewis is a syndicalist company. On the Political compass grid AS's are OPPOSITE to Authoritarianism. How did the Attlee Socialist government of 1945 fail? Was it authoritarian? Why do you spell exactly the same words incorrectly as Viper?

Punk wrote:

Didge wrote:

Punk wrote:
Where did I say YOU had mates in Yemen. It stinks of stupidity on your part. It is It's not Its. It stinks of stupidity on your part. Do Anarcho-Syndicalists, which are Socialists, support a totalitarian system? It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure. Is John Lewis a flawed company? Just asking. Also the guest asked you when the Communists were on and your response was that you were talking about the Hard Left and not Communists. It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure.

Anarcho-Syndicalists is a form of socialism, is not Socialism

Doh and yes it would also require Totaluitarianism


You did say their mates, so I guess you mean the Tories. Though has not Labour also been mates with them

No worries, happy to acknowledge i misread

I said for a socialist system to work, has to be totalitarian, and in every example in has been

That is a historical fact

Some nations use elements of Socialism, but never are socialist Governements. The ones that are, always end up being Totalitarian

John Lewis?

WTF. It makes money through capitalism, so that has to be the dumbest point you have made lol

I am sure you stink full stop Cathy

LOL Your knowledge is lacking. Anarcho-Syndicalists are anti-totalitarianism hence Anarcho and John Lewis is a syndicalist company. On the Political compass grid AS's are OPPOSITE to Authoritarianism. How did the Attlee Socialist government of 1945 fail? Was it authoritarian? Why do you spell exactly the same words incorrectly as Viper?

Didge wrote:

Punk wrote:
Where did I say YOU had mates in Yemen. It stinks of stupidity on your part. It is It's not Its. It stinks of stupidity on your part. Do Anarcho-Syndicalists, which are Socialists, support a totalitarian system? It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure. Is John Lewis a flawed company? Just asking. Also the guest asked you when the Communists were on and your response was that you were talking about the Hard Left and not Communists. It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure.

Anarcho-Syndicalists is a form of socialism, is not Socialism

Doh and yes it would also require Totaluitarianism


You did say their mates, so I guess you mean the Tories. Though has not Labour also been mates with them

No worries, happy to acknowledge i misread

I said for a socialist system to work, has to be totalitarian, and in every example in has been

That is a historical fact

Some nations use elements of Socialism, but never are socialist Governements. The ones that are, always end up being Totalitarian

John Lewis?

WTF. It makes money through capitalism, so that has to be the dumbest point you have made lol

I am sure you stink full stop Cathy

Punk wrote:
Where did I say YOU had mates in Yemen. It stinks of stupidity on your part. It is It's not Its. It stinks of stupidity on your part. Do Anarcho-Syndicalists, which are Socialists, support a totalitarian system? It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure. Is John Lewis a flawed company? Just asking. Also the guest asked you when the Communists were on and your response was that you were talking about the Hard Left and not Communists. It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure.

Didge wrote:

Punk wrote:

Didge wrote:

Punk wrote:

Didge wrote:Today, they were on

Temper, temper little one lol

Corbynism is Hard left

You asked when Communists had been on this forum

I never made such a claim, you did

Now dry your eyes out eh ha ha

Communists were on this forum? Really? Just wondering how you worked that out, were they Jewish Bolsheviks?

Also what is Hard Left? Please define it. On the political compass map where would that be? Corbyn is almost by Gandhi, so that Hard Left?

Where did I say Communists were on this forum?

The Hard Left?

Sure

Believes in widespread nationalisation.

Check

Nuclear disarmament and internal democracy

Check

Opposition to Weestern foreign policy

Check

Against Capitalism

Check

You told the guest that they were on today. I highlighted it for you. What is wrong with being against imperialist policies like bombing selected countries when there is a human rights issue but do nothing about their mates bombing Yemen causing a very similar catastrophe? It stinks of hypocrisy, doesn't it?

As for capitalism it is a disaster, isn't it? People borrowing money or using foodbanks just to eat. Heat or eat for the elderly. What cracks me up is the people moaning about the UK's role in the financial crash want interventionist policies that Socialists proposed and were scoffed at by Brown and Cameron.

I said hard left, that poster said Communist. That means the hard left were on today, not sure how that is diffficult for you

I pointed out you do not have to be communist to be hard left

I do not have any mates in Yemen bombing and think Saudi Arabia has an appalling human rights record

Its stinks of stupidity on your part, that is for sure

Capitalism is not the best system, but nothing can be worse than socialism. For socialism to truly function requires a totalitarian system

Its also a very flawed system

Cannydc wrote:The first test is on May 5th.

After voting, I shall be at Newmarket for the Guineas meeting.

Here's to a profitable day for me and Labour.

Cannydc wrote:

Didge wrote:lol, so you have the opinion of one person

I actually showed the comparrisons to Hard left views

Go figure

Can you actually think for yourself or do you need to phone another friend?

I share his comparison.

As do most sensible people who don't worship the Shun or the Wail.

The thing is, come a general election Corbyn's REAL beliefs, and his social conscience, will be out there for all to see and make their minds up on.

And that is precisely why the smear campaign is in full swing. The Tories are wetting themselves. They know what is coming.

Didge wrote:lol, so you have the opinion of one person

I actually showed the comparrisons to Hard left views

Go figure

Can you actually think for yourself or do you need to phone another friend?

Punk wrote:

Didge wrote:

Punk wrote:

Didge wrote:

Guest wrote:You failed to answer the question.

What date where they on the forum?

If they weren't then fucking say so.

It's not rocket science.

Today, they were on

Temper, temper little one lol

Corbynism is Hard left

You asked when Communists had been on this forum

I never made such a claim, you did

Now dry your eyes out eh ha ha

Communists were on this forum? Really? Just wondering how you worked that out, were they Jewish Bolsheviks?

Also what is Hard Left? Please define it. On the political compass map where would that be? Corbyn is almost by Gandhi, so that Hard Left?

Where did I say Communists were on this forum?

The Hard Left?

Sure

Believes in widespread nationalisation.

Check

Nuclear disarmament and internal democracy

Check

Opposition to Weestern foreign policy

Check

Against Capitalism

Check

You told the guest that they were on today. I highlighted it for you. What is wrong with being against imperialist policies like bombing selected countries when there is a human rights issue but do nothing about their mates bombing Yemen causing a very similar catastrophe? It stinks of hypocrisy, doesn't it?

As for capitalism it is a disaster, isn't it? People borrowing money or using foodbanks just to eat. Heat or eat for the elderly. What cracks me up is the people moaning about the UK's role in the financial crash want interventionist policies that Socialists proposed and were scoffed at by Brown and Cameron.

Didge wrote:

Punk wrote:

Didge wrote:

Guest wrote:You failed to answer the question.

What date where they on the forum?

If they weren't then fucking say so.

It's not rocket science.

Today, they were on

Temper, temper little one lol

Corbynism is Hard left

You asked when Communists had been on this forum

I never made such a claim, you did

Now dry your eyes out eh ha ha

Communists were on this forum? Really? Just wondering how you worked that out, were they Jewish Bolsheviks?

Also what is Hard Left? Please define it. On the political compass map where would that be? Corbyn is almost by Gandhi, so that Hard Left?

Where did I say Communists were on this forum?

The Hard Left?

Sure

Believes in widespread nationalisation.

Check

Nuclear disarmament and internal democracy

Check

Opposition to Weestern foreign policy

Check

Against Capitalism

Check