by Didge » Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:52 pm
Punk wrote:Didge wrote:Punk wrote:Where did I say YOU had mates in Yemen. It stinks of stupidity on your part. It is It's not Its. It stinks of stupidity on your part. Do Anarcho-Syndicalists, which are Socialists, support a totalitarian system? It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure. Is John Lewis a flawed company? Just asking. Also the guest asked you when the Communists were on and your response was that you were talking about the Hard Left and not Communists. It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure.
Anarcho-Syndicalists is a form of socialism, is not Socialism
Doh and yes it would also require Totaluitarianism
You did say their mates, so I guess you mean the Tories. Though has not Labour also been mates with them
No worries, happy to acknowledge i misread
I said for a socialist system to work, has to be totalitarian, and in every example in has been
That is a historical fact
Some nations use elements of Socialism, but never are socialist Governements. The ones that are, always end up being Totalitarian
John Lewis?
WTF. It makes money through capitalism, so that has to be the dumbest point you have made lol
I am sure you stink full stop Cathy
LOL Your knowledge is lacking. Anarcho-Syndicalists are anti-totalitarianism hence Anarcho and John Lewis is a syndicalist company. On the Political compass grid AS's are OPPOSITE to Authoritarianism. How did the Attlee Socialist government of 1945 fail? Was it authoritarian? Why do you spell exactly the same words incorrectly as Viper?
lol, see there you go, Cathy Newman alert
I never said they were Totalitarian, I said it would require Totalitarianism, in other words to work as a Governement
Doh
John lewis uses capitalism, so that one falls by the way side
Attlee's Government was not a Socialist Government
Why do you claim not to be a Labour supporter, when its clear you have the makings of an Corbynite imbicille?
Why are you so paranoid as well?
[quote="Punk"][quote="Didge"][quote="Punk"]
Where did I say YOU had mates in Yemen. It stinks of stupidity on your part. It is It's not Its. It stinks of stupidity on your part. Do Anarcho-Syndicalists, which are Socialists, support a totalitarian system? It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure. Is John Lewis a flawed company? Just asking. Also the guest asked you when the Communists were on and your response was that you were talking about the Hard Left and not Communists. It stinks of stupidity on your part, that's for sure. :Hiya:[/quote]
Anarcho-Syndicalists is a form of socialism, is not Socialism
Doh and yes it would also require Totaluitarianism
You did say their mates, so I guess you mean the Tories. Though has not Labour also been mates with them
No worries, happy to acknowledge i misread
I said for a socialist system to work, has to be totalitarian, and in every example in has been
That is a historical fact
Some nations use elements of Socialism, but never are socialist Governements. The ones that are, always end up being Totalitarian
John Lewis?
WTF. It makes money through capitalism, so that has to be the dumbest point you have made lol
I am sure you stink full stop Cathy
:smilin:[/quote]
LOL Your knowledge is lacking. Anarcho-Syndicalists are anti-totalitarianism hence Anarcho and John Lewis is a syndicalist company. On the Political compass grid AS's are OPPOSITE to Authoritarianism. How did the Attlee Socialist government of 1945 fail? Was it authoritarian? Why do you spell exactly the same words incorrectly as Viper?[/quote]
lol, see there you go, Cathy Newman alert
I never said they were Totalitarian, I said it would require Totalitarianism, in other words to work as a Governement
Doh
John lewis uses capitalism, so that one falls by the way side
Attlee's Government was not a Socialist Government
Why do you claim not to be a Labour supporter, when its clear you have the makings of an Corbynite imbicille?
Why are you so paranoid as well?