This forum operates on GMT to stop international time confusion
Skip to content
by Lady Murasaki » Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:39 pm
Cannydc wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:Cannydc wrote:In areas like these, they are populist figureheads - given the odd glimpse of power, a decent salary and a nice house. That's it.He probably already had the nice house, money etc.He must be regretting it already! Unless he has a plan for taking on those rabid Mullahs.Those kind of plans often end in a one-sided homicide fest. And it wouldn't be in his favour.
Lady Murasaki wrote:Cannydc wrote:In areas like these, they are populist figureheads - given the odd glimpse of power, a decent salary and a nice house. That's it.He probably already had the nice house, money etc.He must be regretting it already! Unless he has a plan for taking on those rabid Mullahs.
Cannydc wrote:In areas like these, they are populist figureheads - given the odd glimpse of power, a decent salary and a nice house. That's it.
by Cannydc » Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:35 pm
by Lady Murasaki » Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:27 pm
by Cannydc » Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:20 pm
by Lady Murasaki » Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:38 pm
Cannydc wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:LordRaven wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:LordRaven wrote:It would be nice to have proper posters comment on the subject of the thread rather then the incessant trolling of someone who clearly missed out on childhood as much as Michael Jackson.It will be interesting to see what Imran Khan does. Will he go along with mob rule or make a stand against it as he’d promised when being elected? With only fatwas threatened against him I am sure he will do the right thingHe’s caved https://tribune.com.pk/story/1840396/1- ... nt-jemima/Not a great start, now they’ll think they can bully their way through the judiciary. Bit like the billionaires who own the media here bullying the judges over the Brexit debacle.She should have gone when she had the chance.The Pakistan religious heirarchy wields great power there, in some ways Imran faces the same difficulties as Aung San Suu Kyi does in Myanmar under the military.
Lady Murasaki wrote:LordRaven wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:LordRaven wrote:It would be nice to have proper posters comment on the subject of the thread rather then the incessant trolling of someone who clearly missed out on childhood as much as Michael Jackson.It will be interesting to see what Imran Khan does. Will he go along with mob rule or make a stand against it as he’d promised when being elected? With only fatwas threatened against him I am sure he will do the right thingHe’s caved https://tribune.com.pk/story/1840396/1- ... nt-jemima/Not a great start, now they’ll think they can bully their way through the judiciary. Bit like the billionaires who own the media here bullying the judges over the Brexit debacle.
LordRaven wrote:Lady Murasaki wrote:LordRaven wrote:It would be nice to have proper posters comment on the subject of the thread rather then the incessant trolling of someone who clearly missed out on childhood as much as Michael Jackson.It will be interesting to see what Imran Khan does. Will he go along with mob rule or make a stand against it as he’d promised when being elected? With only fatwas threatened against him I am sure he will do the right thing
Lady Murasaki wrote:LordRaven wrote:It would be nice to have proper posters comment on the subject of the thread rather then the incessant trolling of someone who clearly missed out on childhood as much as Michael Jackson.It will be interesting to see what Imran Khan does. Will he go along with mob rule or make a stand against it as he’d promised when being elected?
LordRaven wrote:It would be nice to have proper posters comment on the subject of the thread rather then the incessant trolling of someone who clearly missed out on childhood as much as Michael Jackson.
by Cannydc » Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:32 pm
by Lady Murasaki » Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:19 pm
by LordRaven » Tue Nov 06, 2018 4:54 pm
by Lady Murasaki » Tue Nov 06, 2018 9:03 am
by McAz » Wed Oct 31, 2018 8:31 pm
McAz wrote:LordRaven wrote:The post is verbatim - why did you not provide accreditation (as required on this site) if you did not want it to appear to others as your own work?Off out you silly old duffer, have fun talking to yourself
LordRaven wrote:The post is verbatim - why did you not provide accreditation (as required on this site) if you did not want it to appear to others as your own work?
by LordRaven » Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:56 pm
McAz wrote:LordRaven wrote:McAz wrote:LordRaven wrote:That is so funny. Azwipe calling someone a liar.Go talk to the man in the mirror and you'll be accurate when you accuse him of being a lying c**t. Proof of the pudding - do you deny that you posted this Wiki material as your own?LordRaven wrote:In theism, God is the creator and sustainer of the universe, while in deism, God is the creator, but not the sustainer, of the universe. In pantheism, God is the universe itself. In atheism, there is an absence of belief in God. In agnosticism, the existence of God is deemed unknown or unknowableYes! You are such a fucking idiotic old fart. I never once claimed I posted it as my own ---but you did and have done ever since, which shows you are an OCD weirdo The post is verbatim - why did you not provide accreditation (as required on this site) if you did not want it to appear to others as your own work?
LordRaven wrote:McAz wrote:LordRaven wrote:That is so funny. Azwipe calling someone a liar.Go talk to the man in the mirror and you'll be accurate when you accuse him of being a lying c**t. Proof of the pudding - do you deny that you posted this Wiki material as your own?LordRaven wrote:In theism, God is the creator and sustainer of the universe, while in deism, God is the creator, but not the sustainer, of the universe. In pantheism, God is the universe itself. In atheism, there is an absence of belief in God. In agnosticism, the existence of God is deemed unknown or unknowableYes! You are such a fucking idiotic old fart. I never once claimed I posted it as my own ---but you did and have done ever since, which shows you are an OCD weirdo
McAz wrote:LordRaven wrote:That is so funny. Azwipe calling someone a liar.Go talk to the man in the mirror and you'll be accurate when you accuse him of being a lying c**t. Proof of the pudding - do you deny that you posted this Wiki material as your own?LordRaven wrote:In theism, God is the creator and sustainer of the universe, while in deism, God is the creator, but not the sustainer, of the universe. In pantheism, God is the universe itself. In atheism, there is an absence of belief in God. In agnosticism, the existence of God is deemed unknown or unknowable
LordRaven wrote:That is so funny. Azwipe calling someone a liar.Go talk to the man in the mirror and you'll be accurate when you accuse him of being a lying c**t.
LordRaven wrote:In theism, God is the creator and sustainer of the universe, while in deism, God is the creator, but not the sustainer, of the universe. In pantheism, God is the universe itself. In atheism, there is an absence of belief in God. In agnosticism, the existence of God is deemed unknown or unknowable
by McAz » Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:21 pm
by LordRaven » Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:19 pm
by McAz » Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:12 pm
by LordRaven » Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:11 pm
McAz wrote:LordRaven wrote:It would be nice to have proper posters comment on the subject of the thread rather then the incessant trolling of someone who clearly missed out on childhood as much as Michael Jackson.If you didn't continually lie perhaps we could?
Top