by art0hur0moh » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:54 pm
art0hur0moh wrote:what a treacherous bunch. elect a leader and decide to bolt when the leader they have chosen is in a sticky situation. Parliament needs a serious reform antiquated and unfit for purpose. Oh, how would I deal with it, glad you asked : ) I would get military analysts in at the very least with the directive to make Parliamentary business as efficient as possible. that's step 1.
step 2.
when the Queen invited everyone to Her birthday bash there was only one party. Josephs interpretation of the rock from heaven is where I am going with this.
I would suggest Parliament have a private twitter account specifically for Parliamentary debates or tech that functions with a few more specific features including. installing direct sound speakers so mps can talk with each other without disrupting what is being discussed on the floor and still hear what is being discussed or debated. 600 people and they can't improve the health or wealth of the most impoverished People, it is a disgrace to even consider consideration is at the forefront of being there. I was under the illusion the decision to become mps was to do the job others have not been able to do before? they are all there for the same reason, stop with the whining, bickering and snide digs, it is unbecoming of Ladies and Gentlemen. that is what We are first and for most in one Home, Earth, Parliament is supposed to represent the civil and Social dynamics of Our culture and influences. there should be more openness without Parliament needing to use Royal Prerogative. voting is participation! We the People have supported and defended the government for decades, centuries and millennia throughout all the wars, poverty inflicted upon the People. there is only so much that can give within a system that is so stressed the slightest excessive force would cause a cascade across the entire economy, and none are completely secure within the Peoples vision.
[quote="art0hur0moh"]what a treacherous bunch. elect a leader and decide to bolt when the leader they have chosen is in a sticky situation. Parliament needs a serious reform antiquated and unfit for purpose. Oh, how would I deal with it, glad you asked : ) I would get military analysts in at the very least with the directive to make Parliamentary business as efficient as possible. that's step 1.[/quote]
step 2.
when the Queen invited everyone to Her birthday bash there was only one party. Josephs interpretation of the rock from heaven is where I am going with this.
I would suggest Parliament have a private twitter account specifically for Parliamentary debates or tech that functions with a few more specific features including. installing direct sound speakers so mps can talk with each other without disrupting what is being discussed on the floor and still hear what is being discussed or debated. 600 people and they can't improve the health or wealth of the most impoverished People, it is a disgrace to even consider consideration is at the forefront of being there. I was under the illusion the decision to become mps was to do the job others have not been able to do before? they are all there for the same reason, stop with the whining, bickering and snide digs, it is unbecoming of Ladies and Gentlemen. that is what We are first and for most in one Home, Earth, Parliament is supposed to represent the civil and Social dynamics of Our culture and influences. there should be more openness without Parliament needing to use Royal Prerogative. voting is participation! We the People have supported and defended the government for decades, centuries and millennia throughout all the wars, poverty inflicted upon the People. there is only so much that can give within a system that is so stressed the slightest excessive force would cause a cascade across the entire economy, and none are completely secure within the Peoples vision.
