Dogs Sleeping Forum

This forum operates on GMT to stop international time confusion

Skip to content

Aggravated theft

Forum rules

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
Smilies
:gigglesnshit: :eyebrow: :header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :NAA: :canny: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :dafinger: :pukeup: :Hiya: :bored: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Aggravated theft

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by MungoBrush » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:59 am

Fletch wrote:So all different kinds of people then, not one particular demographic such as

features the seizure of an estimated 260,00 dunams(64,247 acres) from Palestine’s Bedouins


You have no clue what are the ethnicities of those people involved for the HS2
They might all be gypsies
Presumably - if they were - you'd be screaming outrage.

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by jra » Fri Feb 15, 2019 2:20 am

MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.


Is it to remove one particular demographic? :dunno:


Yes.
It's to move all the people living in the way of the new rail track.


What's that got to do with demographics?

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by Fletch » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:52 pm

MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.


Is it to remove one particular demographic? :dunno:


Yes.
It's to move all the people living in the way of the new rail track.


So all different kinds of people then, not one particular demographic such as

features the seizure of an estimated 260,00 dunams(64,247 acres) from Palestine’s Bedouins

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by MungoBrush » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:47 pm

Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.


Is it to remove one particular demographic? :dunno:


Yes.
It's to move all the people living in the way of the new rail track.

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by Fletch » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:36 pm

MungoBrush wrote:
Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.


Is it to remove one particular demographic? :dunno:

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by MungoBrush » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:35 pm

Fletch wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...


You Twat

Nearly 2000 buildings are being demolished to make way for HS2 for example

Is that apartheid?

You should think before you post.

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by Fletch » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:16 pm

calitom wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


I agree. Plus you have to factor in Israel wanting a buffer zone from attack following the 67 and 72 wars.

I also agree that Israel is a pain in the butt and and an attention hog. But lets face it The Palestinians were thrown out of every other place.
And if palestine controlled what is now israel then israel would turn into an impoverished muslim hellhole within a few months.
Its nice to talk about palestinian rights...But they could never successfully function on their own


WTF? :scratch:

You'll have to explain that one Tom.

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by Fletch » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:14 pm

MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


A spot of ethnic cleansing is ok in your book then.

Apartheid still popular with the right wing, who'd a guessed...

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by jra » Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:34 pm

Other than Human Rights Watch (featured in article) where is the condemnation from the west? Any other nation and all hell breaks loose. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Russia, China, but Israel and suddenly barbaric behaviour and breaking international law is fine.


Simply because Israel is in terms of the west 'friends/allies' and the other countries are our (the west's) perceived (historic) enemies.

Russia. The cold war. Nearly caused WW3 with the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria. Terrorist attacks against the west, amongst other things
Libya. Lockerbie bombing, supplying Semtex to the IRA, amongst other things.
China. Simply because it's a ruthless dictatorship and has an extremely poor human rights record.

Another reason may be Israeli (Jewish) influence in the west, i.e. very prominent in politics, finance, media and the film industry.

Another reason may be the west wants to keep Israel on their side, not make an enemy of them and it could be crucial when WW3 breaks out (my prediction and most likely to originate from somewhere in the Middle East).

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by MungoBrush » Tue Feb 12, 2019 10:58 am

Rolluplostinspace wrote:I never heard of people going hungry there did you before the 1940's invasion of land grabbers?


Mabe that's because they were ruled by the Turks for 400 years leading up to WW1, then by the British after that until 1947.

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by Rolluplostinspace » Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:52 pm

calitom wrote:
MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


I agree. Plus you have to factor in Israel wanting a buffer zone from attack following the 67 and 72 wars.

I also agree that Israel is a pain in the butt and and an attention hog. But lets face it The Palestinians were thrown out of every other place.
And if palestine controlled what is now israel then israel would turn into an impoverished muslim hellhole within a few months.
Its nice to talk about palestinian rights...But they could never successfully function on their own

They had huge fruit farms flocks of sheep and goats industrial estates dams power plants sewage treatment shops traffic hospitals schools.
I never heard of people going hungry there did you before the 1940's invasion of land grabbers?

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by calitom » Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:32 pm

MungoBrush wrote:This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.


I agree. Plus you have to factor in Israel wanting a buffer zone from attack following the 67 and 72 wars.

I also agree that Israel is a pain in the butt and and an attention hog. But lets face it The Palestinians were thrown out of every other place.
And if palestine controlled what is now israel then israel would turn into an impoverished muslim hellhole within a few months.
Its nice to talk about palestinian rights...But they could never successfully function on their own

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by MungoBrush » Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:57 am

This land seems to be inside the original borders of the State of Israel - not in the occupied territories
So how is this different to compulsory moving people in the UK to clear slums or build a new road etc?
I'm no fan of the state of Israel but this does seem to be a bit of a beat up to me.

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by MungoBrush » Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:52 am

Rolluplostinspace wrote:
calitom wrote:The palestinians--run by Hamas--whose written charter describes its main purpose as the destruction of Israel and the replacement of it by palestine.---But of course they must be joking.And israel should realize that and just give them back all the land they annexed after they were attacked;).And then Hamas will be happy and not want to kill all the jews anymore.And they can dance around the maypole.

"Alll Hamass is saaaayingggg...is give peace a chaaance""

Funny how Jews and Muslims lived side by side on that piece of land in relative peace for two thousand years and then comes the Zionist project.


Islam didnt start until the 7th century.

Re: Aggravated theft

Post by calitom » Sun Feb 10, 2019 8:30 pm

McAz wrote:
calitom wrote:The palestinians--run by Hamas--whose written charter describes its main purpose as the destruction of Israel and the replacement of it by palestine.---But of course they must be joking.And israel should realize that and just give them back all the land they annexed after they were attacked;).And then Hamas will be happy and not want to kill all the jews anymore.And they can dance around the maypole.

"Alll Hamass is saaaayingggg...is give peace a chaaance""


No it doesn't, it has since been revised.


Thank God. Though I hope they didnt have their hands behind their back with their fingers crossed when they signed the new one.

Top

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group