Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
Smilies
:gigglesnshit: :eyebrow: :header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :NAA: :canny: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :dafinger: :pukeup: :Hiya: :bored: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Lady Murasaki » Wed Apr 10, 2019 4:27 pm

Maddog wrote:
Rolluplostinspace wrote:
Guest wrote:
Maddog wrote:A pregnant woman who shot and killed an intruder who attacked her in her Arkansas home is facing felony gun possession charges -- even though authorities ruled that the shooting was justified -- due to a prior marijuana conviction.

On the afternoon of Dec. 7, Fort Smith resident Krissy Noble, 21, shot and killed Dylan Stancoff when he attacked her in her apartment, according to a press release from the Sebastian County Prosecutor's Office. Noble was 11 weeks pregnant at the time, according to a police report from the Fort Smith Police Department.

When officers arrived to the scene that day, witnesses pointed them to the living room where Stancoff lay dead on the couch, a pool of blood on the floor next to him, according to the police report.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/pregnant-woma ... d=57501792


The government said she shouldn't have a gun because she sold a bad plant. Her and her unborn child are safe because she had that gun.

So you think convicted drug dealers should have guns?

Maddogs thinking is often very childlike take his stance on guns.
I want so I should have and no one can tell me any different!
I don't like rules I want to be able to do what I want.
He thinks if the government upset him he can go and kill them.
In the shadows he's frightened like most Americans that the big bad bogey man .... the government .... are going to come and steal his toys and make him do bad things.
Funny he thinks the American people should be armed against the American government but Iran and such places shouldn't because the American government is all liberating bringing freedom and democracy ....



And your frightened of your neighbor having a gun.

I don't care how many he has.

And I don't care how many guns the folks in Iran have either. Unlike you, I spend very little time obsessing about people in other countries.


But you post amongst Brits so you do care what we think. :wubwub:

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Guest » Wed Apr 10, 2019 2:32 pm

Man wearing a Trump T-shirt abuses people at Christchurch mosque where more than 40 people died

A man wearing a Donald Trump T-shirt has yelled abuse at members of the Muslim community gathered at one of the mosques targeted in the Christchurch terror attack.
Of the 50 victims killed in the March 15 shootings, more than 40 were at Masjid Al Noor, on Deans Ave. On Wednesday afternoon, a man wearing a T-shirt supporting United States President Donald Trump turned up outside the mosque and started yelling abuse.
A post on the Muslims in Christchurch and Canterbury Facebook page said the man was wearing a shirt that said "Trump for New Zealand". A photo showed the man standing beside two police officers in the Trump T-Shirt.
The man was swearing and saying that Muslims were terrorists, according to the post. He also told people at the mosque, people who were still grieving the loss of their loved ones, that "we all need to leave" New Zealand, the post said.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/christ ... le-gathere

Fascist scum :shoot:

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Rolluplostinspace » Tue Apr 02, 2019 10:15 am

Maddog wrote:
Guest wrote:
Maddog wrote:A pregnant woman who shot and killed an intruder who attacked her in her Arkansas home is facing felony gun possession charges -- even though authorities ruled that the shooting was justified -- due to a prior marijuana conviction.

On the afternoon of Dec. 7, Fort Smith resident Krissy Noble, 21, shot and killed Dylan Stancoff when he attacked her in her apartment, according to a press release from the Sebastian County Prosecutor's Office. Noble was 11 weeks pregnant at the time, according to a police report from the Fort Smith Police Department.

When officers arrived to the scene that day, witnesses pointed them to the living room where Stancoff lay dead on the couch, a pool of blood on the floor next to him, according to the police report.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/pregnant-woma ... d=57501792


The government said she shouldn't have a gun because she sold a bad plant. Her and her unborn child are safe because she had that gun.

So you think convicted drug dealers should have guns?


I don't think people should be convicted for a plant, therefore I'm cool with people that sell plants owning guns.

Even convicted criminals should be given their rights back after some length of time.

I live in the countryside ... lots of shotguns.

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Cactus Jack » Tue Apr 02, 2019 5:34 am

Maddog wrote:
Grafenwalder wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Maddog wrote:Let's make this simple. I don't care if a single member of this forum has an AR in their closet. It's none of my fucking business.

What boggles my mind us how just about everyone else on this forum is so fucking worried about what the rest of the posters have in their closets.

I don't have a problem with people who choose not to own weapons. I just have a problem with people who cant respect other people's decisions as to whether they own them or not.

Mind your own fucking business.

Let me make this simpler.

I know three people who I know have guns and that doesn't bother me because I know they have passed a stringent set of tests that includes periodic checks on their capacity and capability to own a firearm and to prevent that firearm from being abused by members of their family or stolen. The firearms they own are proportionate to their needs and those limitations are a matter of law. No-one should be worried about responsible gun owners with legally held guns who take proper precautions to ensure their weapons are not a threat to themselves or others.

On the other hand a gun in the hand of idiot is a danger not only to that idiot but to everyone else too.

You say you're not an idiot and, a jibes to one side, by an large I'm prepared to take you at your word but you will notice the Christchurch Shooter did not carry out his massacre in Australia and that was because he couldn't because of Australia's gun control laws.

Now if you check into it you'll find that Australia's gun control laws are probably something you could live with, the only difference being that all the sensible things you claim to do to ensure your safety and that of others are not merely advised but mandated by law.

You're not defending responsible gun ownership, responsible gun ownership is completely unaffected by Australia style laws, you're defending irresponsible gun ownership

I believe you get to engage in a right unless you prove you are an idiot. You have no obligation to prove to the government you are not an idiot. Rights limit the government, not the citizen, as it's the government that needs to be limited based on its power.

I think Australia'a gun laws are repressive.

Even when they work? :scratch:

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... 934798002/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-35048251



Work at what? Taking away freedom?

Australia had a very low murder rate before they enacted any new laws.

So yes, I think gun confiscation is repressive.

Yes but all the evidence says you're wrong.

Facts Trump your opinion

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Maddog » Tue Apr 02, 2019 1:32 am

Grafenwalder wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Maddog wrote:Let's make this simple. I don't care if a single member of this forum has an AR in their closet. It's none of my fucking business.

What boggles my mind us how just about everyone else on this forum is so fucking worried about what the rest of the posters have in their closets.

I don't have a problem with people who choose not to own weapons. I just have a problem with people who cant respect other people's decisions as to whether they own them or not.

Mind your own fucking business.

Let me make this simpler.

I know three people who I know have guns and that doesn't bother me because I know they have passed a stringent set of tests that includes periodic checks on their capacity and capability to own a firearm and to prevent that firearm from being abused by members of their family or stolen. The firearms they own are proportionate to their needs and those limitations are a matter of law. No-one should be worried about responsible gun owners with legally held guns who take proper precautions to ensure their weapons are not a threat to themselves or others.

On the other hand a gun in the hand of idiot is a danger not only to that idiot but to everyone else too.

You say you're not an idiot and, a jibes to one side, by an large I'm prepared to take you at your word but you will notice the Christchurch Shooter did not carry out his massacre in Australia and that was because he couldn't because of Australia's gun control laws.

Now if you check into it you'll find that Australia's gun control laws are probably something you could live with, the only difference being that all the sensible things you claim to do to ensure your safety and that of others are not merely advised but mandated by law.

You're not defending responsible gun ownership, responsible gun ownership is completely unaffected by Australia style laws, you're defending irresponsible gun ownership

I believe you get to engage in a right unless you prove you are an idiot. You have no obligation to prove to the government you are not an idiot. Rights limit the government, not the citizen, as it's the government that needs to be limited based on its power.

I think Australia'a gun laws are repressive.

Even when they work? :scratch:

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... 934798002/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-35048251



Work at what? Taking away freedom?

Australia had a very low murder rate before they enacted any new laws.

So yes, I think gun confiscation is repressive.

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Maddog » Tue Apr 02, 2019 1:29 am

Rolluplostinspace wrote:
Guest wrote:
Maddog wrote:A pregnant woman who shot and killed an intruder who attacked her in her Arkansas home is facing felony gun possession charges -- even though authorities ruled that the shooting was justified -- due to a prior marijuana conviction.

On the afternoon of Dec. 7, Fort Smith resident Krissy Noble, 21, shot and killed Dylan Stancoff when he attacked her in her apartment, according to a press release from the Sebastian County Prosecutor's Office. Noble was 11 weeks pregnant at the time, according to a police report from the Fort Smith Police Department.

When officers arrived to the scene that day, witnesses pointed them to the living room where Stancoff lay dead on the couch, a pool of blood on the floor next to him, according to the police report.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/pregnant-woma ... d=57501792


The government said she shouldn't have a gun because she sold a bad plant. Her and her unborn child are safe because she had that gun.

So you think convicted drug dealers should have guns?

Maddogs thinking is often very childlike take his stance on guns.
I want so I should have and no one can tell me any different!
I don't like rules I want to be able to do what I want.
He thinks if the government upset him he can go and kill them.
In the shadows he's frightened like most Americans that the big bad bogey man .... the government .... are going to come and steal his toys and make him do bad things.
Funny he thinks the American people should be armed against the American government but Iran and such places shouldn't because the American government is all liberating bringing freedom and democracy ....



And your frightened of your neighbor having a gun.

I don't care how many he has.

And I don't care how many guns the folks in Iran have either. Unlike you, I spend very little time obsessing about people in other countries.

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Maddog » Tue Apr 02, 2019 1:27 am

Guest wrote:
Maddog wrote:A pregnant woman who shot and killed an intruder who attacked her in her Arkansas home is facing felony gun possession charges -- even though authorities ruled that the shooting was justified -- due to a prior marijuana conviction.

On the afternoon of Dec. 7, Fort Smith resident Krissy Noble, 21, shot and killed Dylan Stancoff when he attacked her in her apartment, according to a press release from the Sebastian County Prosecutor's Office. Noble was 11 weeks pregnant at the time, according to a police report from the Fort Smith Police Department.

When officers arrived to the scene that day, witnesses pointed them to the living room where Stancoff lay dead on the couch, a pool of blood on the floor next to him, according to the police report.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/pregnant-woma ... d=57501792


The government said she shouldn't have a gun because she sold a bad plant. Her and her unborn child are safe because she had that gun.

So you think convicted drug dealers should have guns?


I don't think people should be convicted for a plant, therefore I'm cool with people that sell plants owning guns.

Even convicted criminals should be given their rights back after some length of time.

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Guest » Mon Apr 01, 2019 5:04 pm

Maddog wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Maddog wrote:Let's make this simple. I don't care if a single member of this forum has an AR in their closet. It's none of my fucking business.

What boggles my mind us how just about everyone else on this forum is so fucking worried about what the rest of the posters have in their closets.

I don't have a problem with people who choose not to own weapons. I just have a problem with people who cant respect other people's decisions as to whether they own them or not.

Mind your own fucking business.

Let me make this simpler.

I know three people who I know have guns and that doesn't bother me because I know they have passed a stringent set of tests that includes periodic checks on their capacity and capability to own a firearm and to prevent that firearm from being abused by members of their family or stolen. The firearms they own are proportionate to their needs and those limitations are a matter of law. No-one should be worried about responsible gun owners with legally held guns who take proper precautions to ensure their weapons are not a threat to themselves or others.

On the other hand a gun in the hand of idiot is a danger not only to that idiot but to everyone else too.

You say you're not an idiot and, a jibes to one side, by an large I'm prepared to take you at your word but you will notice the Christchurch Shooter did not carry out his massacre in Australia and that was because he couldn't because of Australia's gun control laws.

Now if you check into it you'll find that Australia's gun control laws are probably something you could live with, the only difference being that all the sensible things you claim to do to ensure your safety and that of others are not merely advised but mandated by law.

You're not defending responsible gun ownership, responsible gun ownership is completely unaffected by Australia style laws, you're defending irresponsible gun ownership

I believe you get to engage in a right unless you prove you are an idiot. You have no obligation to prove to the government you are not an idiot. Rights limit the government, not the citizen, as it's the government that needs to be limited based on its power.

I think Australia'a gun laws are repressive.

That's because you're an idiot

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Grafenwalder » Mon Apr 01, 2019 3:56 pm

Maddog wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Maddog wrote:Let's make this simple. I don't care if a single member of this forum has an AR in their closet. It's none of my fucking business.

What boggles my mind us how just about everyone else on this forum is so fucking worried about what the rest of the posters have in their closets.

I don't have a problem with people who choose not to own weapons. I just have a problem with people who cant respect other people's decisions as to whether they own them or not.

Mind your own fucking business.

Let me make this simpler.

I know three people who I know have guns and that doesn't bother me because I know they have passed a stringent set of tests that includes periodic checks on their capacity and capability to own a firearm and to prevent that firearm from being abused by members of their family or stolen. The firearms they own are proportionate to their needs and those limitations are a matter of law. No-one should be worried about responsible gun owners with legally held guns who take proper precautions to ensure their weapons are not a threat to themselves or others.

On the other hand a gun in the hand of idiot is a danger not only to that idiot but to everyone else too.

You say you're not an idiot and, a jibes to one side, by an large I'm prepared to take you at your word but you will notice the Christchurch Shooter did not carry out his massacre in Australia and that was because he couldn't because of Australia's gun control laws.

Now if you check into it you'll find that Australia's gun control laws are probably something you could live with, the only difference being that all the sensible things you claim to do to ensure your safety and that of others are not merely advised but mandated by law.

You're not defending responsible gun ownership, responsible gun ownership is completely unaffected by Australia style laws, you're defending irresponsible gun ownership

I believe you get to engage in a right unless you prove you are an idiot. You have no obligation to prove to the government you are not an idiot. Rights limit the government, not the citizen, as it's the government that needs to be limited based on its power.

I think Australia'a gun laws are repressive.

Even when they work? :scratch:

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... 934798002/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-35048251

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Rolluplostinspace » Mon Apr 01, 2019 3:06 pm

Guest wrote:
Maddog wrote:A pregnant woman who shot and killed an intruder who attacked her in her Arkansas home is facing felony gun possession charges -- even though authorities ruled that the shooting was justified -- due to a prior marijuana conviction.

On the afternoon of Dec. 7, Fort Smith resident Krissy Noble, 21, shot and killed Dylan Stancoff when he attacked her in her apartment, according to a press release from the Sebastian County Prosecutor's Office. Noble was 11 weeks pregnant at the time, according to a police report from the Fort Smith Police Department.

When officers arrived to the scene that day, witnesses pointed them to the living room where Stancoff lay dead on the couch, a pool of blood on the floor next to him, according to the police report.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/pregnant-woma ... d=57501792


The government said she shouldn't have a gun because she sold a bad plant. Her and her unborn child are safe because she had that gun.

So you think convicted drug dealers should have guns?

Maddogs thinking is often very childlike take his stance on guns.
I want so I should have and no one can tell me any different!
I don't like rules I want to be able to do what I want.
He thinks if the government upset him he can go and kill them.
In the shadows he's frightened like most Americans that the big bad bogey man .... the government .... are going to come and steal his toys and make him do bad things.
Funny he thinks the American people should be armed against the American government but Iran and such places shouldn't because the American government is all liberating bringing freedom and democracy ....

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Guest » Mon Apr 01, 2019 2:21 pm

Maddog wrote:A pregnant woman who shot and killed an intruder who attacked her in her Arkansas home is facing felony gun possession charges -- even though authorities ruled that the shooting was justified -- due to a prior marijuana conviction.

On the afternoon of Dec. 7, Fort Smith resident Krissy Noble, 21, shot and killed Dylan Stancoff when he attacked her in her apartment, according to a press release from the Sebastian County Prosecutor's Office. Noble was 11 weeks pregnant at the time, according to a police report from the Fort Smith Police Department.

When officers arrived to the scene that day, witnesses pointed them to the living room where Stancoff lay dead on the couch, a pool of blood on the floor next to him, according to the police report.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/pregnant-woma ... d=57501792


The government said she shouldn't have a gun because she sold a bad plant. Her and her unborn child are safe because she had that gun.

So you think convicted drug dealers should have guns?

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Maddog » Mon Apr 01, 2019 1:33 pm

A pregnant woman who shot and killed an intruder who attacked her in her Arkansas home is facing felony gun possession charges -- even though authorities ruled that the shooting was justified -- due to a prior marijuana conviction.

On the afternoon of Dec. 7, Fort Smith resident Krissy Noble, 21, shot and killed Dylan Stancoff when he attacked her in her apartment, according to a press release from the Sebastian County Prosecutor's Office. Noble was 11 weeks pregnant at the time, according to a police report from the Fort Smith Police Department.

When officers arrived to the scene that day, witnesses pointed them to the living room where Stancoff lay dead on the couch, a pool of blood on the floor next to him, according to the police report.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/pregnant-woma ... d=57501792


The government said she shouldn't have a gun because she sold a bad plant. Her and her unborn child are safe because she had that gun.

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Maddog » Mon Apr 01, 2019 1:24 pm

The crown needs the air guns now. :gigglesnshit:
Attachments
FB_IMG_1554124417026.jpg

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Maddog » Mon Apr 01, 2019 1:21 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
Maddog wrote:Let's make this simple. I don't care if a single member of this forum has an AR in their closet. It's none of my fucking business.

What boggles my mind us how just about everyone else on this forum is so fucking worried about what the rest of the posters have in their closets.

I don't have a problem with people who choose not to own weapons. I just have a problem with people who cant respect other people's decisions as to whether they own them or not.

Mind your own fucking business.

Let me make this simpler.

I know three people who I know have guns and that doesn't bother me because I know they have passed a stringent set of tests that includes periodic checks on their capacity and capability to own a firearm and to prevent that firearm from being abused by members of their family or stolen. The firearms they own are proportionate to their needs and those limitations are a matter of law. No-one should be worried about responsible gun owners with legally held guns who take proper precautions to ensure their weapons are not a threat to themselves or others.

On the other hand a gun in the hand of idiot is a danger not only to that idiot but to everyone else too.

You say you're not an idiot and, a jibes to one side, by an large I'm prepared to take you at your word but you will notice the Christchurch Shooter did not carry out his massacre in Australia and that was because he couldn't because of Australia's gun control laws.

Now if you check into it you'll find that Australia's gun control laws are probably something you could live with, the only difference being that all the sensible things you claim to do to ensure your safety and that of others are not merely advised but mandated by law.

You're not defending responsible gun ownership, responsible gun ownership is completely unaffected by Australia style laws, you're defending irresponsible gun ownership

I believe you get to engage in a right unless you prove you are an idiot. You have no obligation to prove to the government you are not an idiot. Rights limit the government, not the citizen, as it's the government that needs to be limited based on its power.

I think Australia'a gun laws are repressive.

Re: Christchurch mosque shootings: Several dead after New Zealan

Post by Cactus Jack » Sat Mar 30, 2019 8:05 pm

Maddog wrote:Let's make this simple. I don't care if a single member of this forum has an AR in their closet. It's none of my fucking business.

What boggles my mind us how just about everyone else on this forum is so fucking worried about what the rest of the posters have in their closets.

I don't have a problem with people who choose not to own weapons. I just have a problem with people who cant respect other people's decisions as to whether they own them or not.

Mind your own fucking business.

Let me make this simpler.

I know three people who I know have guns and that doesn't bother me because I know they have passed a stringent set of tests that includes periodic checks on their capacity and capability to own a firearm and to prevent that firearm from being abused by members of their family or stolen. The firearms they own are proportionate to their needs and those limitations are a matter of law. No-one should be worried about responsible gun owners with legally held guns who take proper precautions to ensure their weapons are not a threat to themselves or others.

On the other hand a gun in the hand of idiot is a danger not only to that idiot but to everyone else too.

You say you're not an idiot and, a jibes to one side, by an large I'm prepared to take you at your word but you will notice the Christchurch Shooter did not carry out his massacre in Australia and that was because he couldn't because of Australia's gun control laws.

Now if you check into it you'll find that Australia's gun control laws are probably something you could live with, the only difference being that all the sensible things you claim to do to ensure your safety and that of others are not merely advised but mandated by law.

You're not defending responsible gun ownership, responsible gun ownership is completely unaffected by Australia style laws, you're defending irresponsible gun ownership

Top