Dogs Sleeping Forum

Rolluplostinspace wrote:When did they stop paying the police Art?

Cannydc wrote:

Guest wrote:

art0hur0moh wrote:Subjects’ Arms.

That the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as allowed by Law.

this is the curious bit.

a subject can be armed when the state is! but how does that work for a citizen? from My interpretation they can't be armed at any time!?

when voting You subjugate YourSelf. but if you don't vote You can't be a subject without consent (which is a primary statute!)?

And your point is?

Change tack....

Guest wrote:

art0hur0moh wrote:Subjects’ Arms.

That the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as allowed by Law.

this is the curious bit.

a subject can be armed when the state is! but how does that work for a citizen? from My interpretation they can't be armed at any time!?

when voting You subjugate YourSelf. but if you don't vote You can't be a subject without consent (which is a primary statute!)?

And your point is?

art0hur0moh wrote:Subjects’ Arms.

That the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as allowed by Law.

this is the curious bit.

a subject can be armed when the state is! but how does that work for a citizen? from My interpretation they can't be armed at any time!?

when voting You subjugate YourSelf. but if you don't vote You can't be a subject without consent (which is a primary statute!)?

Cannydc wrote:

art0hur0moh wrote:the tyrannical state has alway changed the paradigm. there isn't a century where it hasn't happened. it isn't uncommon police falsify evidence, and if not an individual officer the prosecution asks a confused officer to validate invented witness statements. haven't read a single comment... you have made Your idiolouges know for years. and I can't foresee any change.

always excuses, that is an assumption based on the number of responses I did notice. the only difference between the socialist party in germany is it was christian, where as the soviet was atheist. so religion has no bearing. what is it with Human nature that caused it to fail? venezuela just unelected the coup leader but the wto and world bank still expect illegal contracts be upheals or the u.s. will impose sanctions.

now instead of discussing that it is western propaganda, sanctions, tariffs, and out right theft that has created the idea that socialism doesn't work (it can, if everyone accepted it) because You are for the most part to selfish.

the police are supposed to be a civil militia, but instead they are a corporate security force legally permitted to execute any and all that interrupt their theft uner contract.

You are ruled by bureaucrats and lobbyist! there is no democracy!

but You are still going to ignore the historical record regardless!

How come you managed to miss the sole point of my post - The party you refer to in Germany WAS NOT SOCIALIST.

Come to that neither was the ruling party in Soviet Russia socialist - it was Communist.

You are a genuinely pathetic person, aren't you? And still stupid enough to claim that UK police 'execute' people. They don't.

art0hur0moh wrote:the tyrannical state has alway changed the paradigm. there isn't a century where it hasn't happened. it isn't uncommon police falsify evidence, and if not an individual officer the prosecution asks a confused officer to validate invented witness statements. haven't read a single comment... you have made Your idiolouges know for years. and I can't foresee any change.

always excuses, that is an assumption based on the number of responses I did notice. the only difference between the socialist party in germany is it was christian, where as the soviet was atheist. so religion has no bearing. what is it with Human nature that caused it to fail? venezuela just unelected the coup leader but the wto and world bank still expect illegal contracts be upheals or the u.s. will impose sanctions.

now instead of discussing that it is western propaganda, sanctions, tariffs, and out right theft that has created the idea that socialism doesn't work (it can, if everyone accepted it) because You are for the most part to selfish.

the police are supposed to be a civil militia, but instead they are a corporate security force legally permitted to execute any and all that interrupt their theft uner contract.

You are ruled by bureaucrats and lobbyist! there is no democracy!

but You are still going to ignore the historical record regardless!

Cannydc wrote:

art0hur0moh wrote:wow? how don't You know of the national socialist workers party or soviet socialist republic? and they dare talk about coherence?

And did you know that Hitler insisted that the word 'socialist' was included in the new party name in 1920, because of the philosopher Oswald Spengler - famous for his book The Decline of the West -- from his book Preussentum und Sozialismus whose view of "socialism" openly opposes Marxism and class conflict as well as supports corporatism ?

And that the 96-member Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) was Hitler's main opposition in the Reichstag ?

And that the first political groups targeted during the Nazi ascendancy were pacifists, trade unionists and communists ?

And that Strasserism, the only strand of Nazism that could be referred to as "left-wing" (i.e. pro-working class in nature), were all killed off (with a handful of conservative dissidents) in what we all know as the Night of the Long Knives ?

So, hardly a socialist party then.

Meanwhile, I proudly regard myself as a left-of-center democratic socialist. A real one.

art0hur0moh wrote:wow? how don't You know of the national socialist workers party or soviet socialist republic? and they dare talk about coherence?

art0hur0moh wrote:wow? how don't You know of the national socialist workers party or soviet socialist republic? and they dare talk about coherence?

art0hur0moh wrote:wow? how don't You know of the national socialist workers party or soviet socialist republic? and they dare talk about coherence?

Cannydc wrote:

Guest wrote:

art0hur0moh wrote:cheers text. Canny and Raven just seem to be ignorant of history! they are tyrannical nazis. like all liberal socialist! coherent enough for You Canny? either history is wrong or they are!

Canny DC a Nazi?
Confirmation that you are one seriously deranged individual.
He’s an ardent left wing socialist and a consistent one at that.
He’d vote for a donkey with a red rosette, he’s shown that with his undying support for Corbyn.
And you call him a Nazi, please tell us what an aerial view of a cuckoo’s nest looks like please!

My "undying support of Corbyn"

I am still concerned at rumours that Labour would be neutral in a second ref. If true Corbyn will be kicked out. FFS, 80% of his party want to stay in the EU... The party conference is 21-25 September, should be a lulu.

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=63609&start=270

Art has now resorted to just chucking in any old random insult when things go against him. Seems he's not alone, eh?