Dogs Sleeping Forum

Verum wrote:In defence of Raving, I think he has more dignity than to masquerade as a guest.

Verum wrote:In defence of Raving, I think he has more dignity than to masquerade as a guest.

Cactus Jack wrote:

Guest wrote:

Verum wrote:Yeah, what he said.

They blame Labour for leaving the country in a state in 1979 when it was the Tories fuck up in the early 70s that we couldn't recover from. They left the country so broke the IMF intervened after Heath's shower of shit failed in every policy. they'll try to lie their way out of it. Like 1997 the Tories left the country in an awful state. 400 Billion in debt was huge in 97. The only policy people can remember from Major's Govt was the Traffic Cone hotline...Things were so bad even the Mail said vote BLIAR, then they sucked up to him disgracefully printing the case for an Iraq war more efficiently than any dossier. Printing the graphic of bin Laden in his cave complex without question

Cause and effect twatty tory guest.

If you don't know your British history you wont pass the Citizenship Test

Try not to confuse Tories with facts.

Also don't mention that there was 4% economic growth in 78/79 (the last year of the 'disasterous' Wilson/Callaghan Labour Government) which went to six consecutive quarters of recession under Margaret Thatcher

Guest wrote:

Verum wrote:Yeah, what he said.

They blame Labour for leaving the country in a state in 1979 when it was the Tories fuck up in the early 70s that we couldn't recover from. They left the country so broke the IMF intervened after Heath's shower of shit failed in every policy. they'll try to lie their way out of it. Like 1997 the Tories left the country in an awful state. 400 Billion in debt was huge in 97. The only policy people can remember from Major's Govt was the Traffic Cone hotline...Things were so bad even the Mail said vote BLIAR, then they sucked up to him disgracefully printing the case for an Iraq war more efficiently than any dossier. Printing the graphic of bin Laden in his cave complex without question

Cause and effect twatty tory guest.

If you don't know your British history you wont pass the Citizenship Test

Verum wrote:Yeah, what he said.

Guest wrote:

Verum wrote:

Guest wrote:

Verum wrote:e]
"During Blair's 10 years in office there were 40 successive quarters of economic growth, lasting until the second quarter of 2008."

Accurate history rather than the shite you talk.

Every bloody country in the world had growth because there was a world wide economic boom.

So if you want Labour to get credit for a world wide economic boom that commenced in the last 2 years of John Majors premiership

You can bloody well claim that labour were responsible went it all went tits up then also!!!

You cant have it both ways fuckwit!!

Some people are just liars and the sad fact is they thin k it is clever to post such shite on here?

So when there's growth under Labour it's because of a world wide economic boom but when there's a world wide economic meltdown it's because of Labour. Is that logic your own invention or did you get help from the Daily Mail?

Question. "When was the last time a Labour Government handed over an economy to a new government that was not a disaster?"

Take your time.

BUMPED due to the obvious embarrasment it is causing and the pathetic lies used in feeble attempts to answer it

Clue it was certainly not 2010 or 1979 Those handovers were devoid of any money and both were disasters that had to be cleaned up by the tories--yet again.

Guest wrote:

Verum wrote:

Guest wrote:

Verum wrote:

Guest wrote:But.............

1979 country in shit,roaring inflation,country on strike,economy stuffed,britain borrowing from IMF and we were an international joke = No money and Tories voted in.

1997 country has rgeained national pride and is a leading global financial centre and economy is booming - Money!!! And Labour get voted in.

2010 The country is ruined and labour lose power and indecisive ge means coalition form parliament to sort yet another fine labour mess.

History repeats itself.

Labour = danger

The lefties on here deny all of the above because the truth hurts.

"During Blair's 10 years in office there were 40 successive quarters of economic growth, lasting until the second quarter of 2008."

Accurate history rather than the shite you talk.

Every bloody country in the world had growth because there was a world wide economic boom.

So if you want Labour to get credit for a world wide economic boom that commenced in the last 2 years of John Majors premiership

You can bloody well claim that labour were responsible went it all went tits up then also!!!

You cant have it both ways fuckwit!!

Some people are just liars and the sad fact is they thin k it is clever to post such shite on here?

So when there's growth under Labour it's because of a world wide economic boom but when there's a world wide economic meltdown it's because of Labour. Is that logic your own invention or did you get help from the Daily Mail?

Question. "When was the last time a Labour Government handed over an economy to a new government that was not a disaster?"

Take your time.

Question. "When was the last time a Conservative Government handed over an economy to a new government that was not a disaster with a record deficit, schools crumbling, no immigration staff, interest rates coming down from 15%, gold sold for a song and a record crime rate?"

Take your time.

Verum wrote:

Guest wrote:

Verum wrote:

Guest wrote:But.............

1979 country in shit,roaring inflation,country on strike,economy stuffed,britain borrowing from IMF and we were an international joke = No money and Tories voted in.

1997 country has rgeained national pride and is a leading global financial centre and economy is booming - Money!!! And Labour get voted in.

2010 The country is ruined and labour lose power and indecisive ge means coalition form parliament to sort yet another fine labour mess.

History repeats itself.

Labour = danger

The lefties on here deny all of the above because the truth hurts.

"During Blair's 10 years in office there were 40 successive quarters of economic growth, lasting until the second quarter of 2008."

Accurate history rather than the shite you talk.

Every bloody country in the world had growth because there was a world wide economic boom.

So if you want Labour to get credit for a world wide economic boom that commenced in the last 2 years of John Majors premiership

You can bloody well claim that labour were responsible went it all went tits up then also!!!

You cant have it both ways fuckwit!!

Some people are just liars and the sad fact is they thin k it is clever to post such shite on here?

So when there's growth under Labour it's because of a world wide economic boom but when there's a world wide economic meltdown it's because of Labour. Is that logic your own invention or did you get help from the Daily Mail?

Question. "When was the last time a Labour Government handed over an economy to a new government that was not a disaster?"

Take your time.

Guest wrote:

Verum wrote:

Guest wrote:But.............

1979 country in shit,roaring inflation,country on strike,economy stuffed,britain borrowing from IMF and we were an international joke = No money and Tories voted in.

1997 country has rgeained national pride and is a leading global financial centre and economy is booming - Money!!! And Labour get voted in.

2010 The country is ruined and labour lose power and indecisive ge means coalition form parliament to sort yet another fine labour mess.

History repeats itself.

Labour = danger

The lefties on here deny all of the above because the truth hurts.

"During Blair's 10 years in office there were 40 successive quarters of economic growth, lasting until the second quarter of 2008."

Accurate history rather than the shite you talk.

Every bloody country in the world had growth because there was a world wide economic boom.

So if you want Labour to get credit for a world wide economic boom that commenced in the last 2 years of John Majors premiership

You can bloody well claim that labour were responsible went it all went tits up then also!!!

You cant have it both ways fuckwit!!

Some people are just liars and the sad fact is they thin k it is clever to post such shite on here?

Guest wrote:

Verum wrote:

Guest wrote:But.............

1979 country in shit,roaring inflation,country on strike,economy stuffed,britain borrowing from IMF and we were an international joke = No money and Tories voted in.

1997 country has rgeained national pride and is a leading global financial centre and economy is booming - Money!!! And Labour get voted in.

2010 The country is ruined and labour lose power and indecisive ge means coalition form parliament to sort yet another fine labour mess.

History repeats itself.

Labour = danger

The lefties on here deny all of the above because the truth hurts.

"During Blair's 10 years in office there were 40 successive quarters of economic growth, lasting until the second quarter of 2008."

Accurate history rather than the shite you talk.

Every bloody country in the world had growth because there was a world wide economic boom.

So if you want Labour to get credit for a world wide economic boom that commenced in the last 2 years of John Majors premiership

You can bloody well claim that labour were responsible went it all went tits up then also!!!

You cant have it both ways fuckwit!!

Some people are just liars and the sad fact is they thin k it is clever to post such shite on here?

Verum wrote:

Guest wrote:But.............

1979 country in shit,roaring inflation,country on strike,economy stuffed,britain borrowing from IMF and we were an international joke = No money and Tories voted in.

1997 country has rgeained national pride and is a leading global financial centre and economy is booming - Money!!! And Labour get voted in.

2010 The country is ruined and labour lose power and indecisive ge means coalition form parliament to sort yet another fine labour mess.

History repeats itself.

Labour = danger

The lefties on here deny all of the above because the truth hurts.

"During Blair's 10 years in office there were 40 successive quarters of economic growth, lasting until the second quarter of 2008."

Accurate history rather than the shite you talk.

Guest wrote:

Cactus Jack wrote:

Guest wrote:

Cannydc wrote:Dave says the government is on an “all-out mission” to kick-start industry. Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, will announce that 35,000 jobs will be created using nearly £1 billion of public money.

He will unveil new investment in more than 100 projects that should trigger billions of pounds additional investment from private enterprise. It will include six “shovel-ready” projects, including two new power stations

Well found, Sir !! And an idea I suggested over a year ago - I wonder what changed your mind ?

However, the portents are bleak.

Experts at the Centre for Economic and Business Research said unemployment was set to rise in all but three regions of Britain.

Some of the largest rises were likely to be in Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and the North East.

A poll by Ipsos Mori for the Resolution Foundation, a think-tank, also suggests that a third of Britons are cutting back their spending.


So Dave is sticking another billion on red. Let's hope the wheel is with him for once...

Given Liebour left us disastrously in the red it is a miracle that the coalition have managed to conjure up this money presumably saved from austerity measures.

Good heavans the standard tory lie is repeated and repeated isn't it.

There was no global crisis. No meltdown. It was all Gordon, the trouble is when the same logic is applied to David they won't accept it.

Question - Why is the US economy, which has applied stimulus, growing at 2.5% while the UK economy is static and predicted to go back into recession in Q4. Remember when answering that a slow but steady 1.2% growth rate - far ahead of what had been predicted in the red book, was what the Tories inherited from Labour

Learn to read. Profligacy in a boom time meant we were stuffed when the crash happened. And that young lady is undeniable.