Dogs Sleeping Forum

This forum operates on GMT to stop international time confusion

Skip to content

That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Forum rules

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
Smilies
:gigglesnshit: :eyebrow: :header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :NAA: :canny: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :dafinger: :pukeup: :Hiya: :bored: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Cactus Jack » Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:04 am

Take your own advice Simon.

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by euthanasiaforsome » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:51 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:No Maddog you stated that Scots preferred babies deep fried - can you provide your evidence in support of what you said.


Can you provide evidence that they eat them in London?

Having made no such assertion I feel no need to evidence any such claim.

You on the other hand stated as a fact that Scots people prefer babies fried in butter.



Why not do this forum a favor and end your miserable existence, then maybe some decent human being can use the oxygen and other resources you are stealing to keep your miserable, unwanted, despised carcass trolling on here there's a good chap. Don't bother with Dignitas,try the P.D.S.A it is more your calling. Idiot.

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Cactus Jack » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:43 am

Maddog wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:No Maddog you stated that Scots preferred babies deep fried - can you provide your evidence in support of what you said.


Can you provide evidence that they eat them in London?

Having made no such assertion I feel no need to evidence any such claim.

You on the other hand stated as a fact that Scots people prefer babies fried in butter.

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Guest » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:42 pm

Maddog wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:No Maddog you stated that Scots preferred babies deep fried - can you provide your evidence in support of what you said.


Can you provide evidence that they eat them in London?


Why are you misquoting Swift?

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Maddog » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:17 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:No Maddog you stated that Scots preferred babies deep fried - can you provide your evidence in support of what you said.


Can you provide evidence that they eat them in London?

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Cactus Jack » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:06 pm

No Maddog you stated that Scots preferred babies deep fried - can you provide your evidence in support of what you said.

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Maddog » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:05 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
Maddog wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:So your an anti-gallic racist now too.


Nothing wrong with deep frying stuff. I live in a southern state. We deep fry butter.

But you claimed the Scots deep fried babies not butter.


I claimed that if the Scots were to cook babies, they would deep fry them. You brought up eating babies. Not sure why. I'm just running with it.

How would you cook babies?

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Cactus Jack » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:02 pm

Maddog wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:So your an anti-gallic racist now too.


Nothing wrong with deep frying stuff. I live in a southern state. We deep fry butter.

But you claimed the Scots deep fried babies not butter.

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Maddog » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:47 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:So your an anti-gallic racist now too.


Nothing wrong with deep frying stuff. I live in a southern state. We deep fry butter.

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Cactus Jack » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:46 pm

So your an anti-gallic racist now too.

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Maddog » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:44 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:Come on Maddog you've made a holy show of being critical of all attempts to help people now give us your alternative.

How about this

Jonathan Swift wrote:I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled ...


I bet they prefer them deep fried in Scotland!

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Maddog » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:43 pm

Guest wrote:
Maddog wrote:
wutang wrote:
Maddog wrote:Legally they have to pay everyone, yet the amount of money in the treasury is not enough to do that. I'm not a lawyer Wu, but I know that 100 grand wont pay a million bucks in bills, no matter what your political ideaolgy is.


Thats a problem for the City Officials to deal with (again, both sides have suggested means to raise the revenue so the 'we haz no choice' is disingenuous).... the workers shouldnt be expected to just accept it.


It is their problem. A problem I don't have an answer for. Scranton is already a depressed area, and raising taxes will simply push people to cheaper areas. I think he is trying to buy time without laying off huge numbers of city workers. Legally, I think he can fire half the workforce tomorrow. Not sure that is a good solution either.

So far, I have seen dozens of posts about what he shouldn't do. Not one describing what he should do.


It's too fucking late to do anything. The 3 years of austerity ruined that place. What do you want us to suggest?

Turn it into the austerity museum so financiers can go to see that austerity doesn't work :whistle:


That place has been in trouble for more than 3 years. The stage was set long before then.

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Cactus Jack » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:41 pm

Come on Maddog you've made a holy show of being critical of all attempts to help people now give us your alternative.

How about this

Jonathan Swift wrote:I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled ...

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Guest » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:38 pm

Maddog wrote:
wutang wrote:
Maddog wrote:Legally they have to pay everyone, yet the amount of money in the treasury is not enough to do that. I'm not a lawyer Wu, but I know that 100 grand wont pay a million bucks in bills, no matter what your political ideaolgy is.


Thats a problem for the City Officials to deal with (again, both sides have suggested means to raise the revenue so the 'we haz no choice' is disingenuous).... the workers shouldnt be expected to just accept it.


It is their problem. A problem I don't have an answer for. Scranton is already a depressed area, and raising taxes will simply push people to cheaper areas. I think he is trying to buy time without laying off huge numbers of city workers. Legally, I think he can fire half the workforce tomorrow. Not sure that is a good solution either.

So far, I have seen dozens of posts about what he shouldn't do. Not one describing what he should do.


It's too fucking late to do anything. The 3 years of austerity ruined that place. What do you want us to suggest?

Turn it into the austerity museum so financiers can go to see that austerity doesn't work :whistle:

Re: That's one way to save the taxpayer a few bucks!

Post by Maddog » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:36 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:So what's the solution Maddog?



posting.php?mode=quote&f=20&p=535845

Top

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group