by jp761 » Sun Dec 03, 2017 5:13 pm
Goodwife wrote:jp761 wrote:Guest wrote:Feminists must be clapping thrmselves on the back. All the police need to do now is put up another memo that all men are rapists and the brainwashing is complete.
Now you're talking balls.
Tbh though, I'm not even sure the Police should bother with those kinds of 'warnings', especially when they bugger it up.
I would say that someone who has sexual assault within them, wouldn't be thinking of a few words the Police put out there on twitter. I think sexual assault is something that someone is either capable of or they're not. Unlike speeding/parking where we shouldn't, for example, we are all capable of those.
Its about educating people JP.
If someone started this thread on DS there would be a fair few "men" saying that a women kissing back is consent. That You can't stop and ask a women if she wants to proceed whilst you are in the throes of passion etc etc
That last one is lost on me, I assume that these "men" have either had not a lot of sex or are really bad at it.
Ok that's fine for the young, no problem. Under 20 maybe. But after that, and generally speaking, I would say someone is either capable of something like sexual assault or they are not.
A woman kissing back is consent to kiss, that's it at that point. Blimey, surely everyone would know that.
People have brought up the 'vinegar stroke' scenario, and talked about if a woman says stop at that point, that's what I think you mean. Unlikely a woman would get to that point of sexual intercourse and say no/stop, but, if it happens the guy would of course have to pull out and grab a tissue if possible. Sorry to be blunt here, but this is what has been mentioned on DS in the past.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define. ... %20strokes[quote="Goodwife"][quote="jp761"][quote="Guest"]Feminists must be clapping thrmselves on the back. All the police need to do now is put up another memo that all men are rapists and the brainwashing is complete.[/quote]Now you're talking balls.
Tbh though, I'm not even sure the Police should bother with those kinds of 'warnings', especially when they bugger it up.
I would say that someone who has sexual assault within them, wouldn't be thinking of a few words the Police put out there on twitter. I think sexual assault is something that someone is either capable of or they're not. Unlike speeding/parking where we shouldn't, for example, we are all capable of those.[/quote]
Its about educating people JP.
If someone started this thread on DS there would be a fair few "men" saying that a women kissing back is consent. That You can't stop and ask a women if she wants to proceed whilst you are in the throes of passion etc etc
That last one is lost on me, I assume that these "men" have either had not a lot of sex or are really bad at it.[/quote]Ok that's fine for the young, no problem. Under 20 maybe. But after that, and generally speaking, I would say someone is either capable of something like sexual assault or they are not.
A woman kissing back is consent to kiss, that's it at that point. Blimey, surely everyone would know that.
People have brought up the 'vinegar stroke' scenario, and talked about if a woman says stop at that point, that's what I think you mean. Unlikely a woman would get to that point of sexual intercourse and say no/stop, but, if it happens the guy would of course have to pull out and grab a tissue if possible. Sorry to be blunt here, but this is what has been mentioned on DS in the past.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=vinegar%20strokes
