Dogs Sleeping Forum

This forum operates on GMT to stop international time confusion

Skip to content

Female Paedo

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
Smilies
:gigglesnshit: :eyebrow: :header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :NAA: :canny: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :dafinger: :pukeup: :Hiya: :bored: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Female Paedo

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Dean » Thu Dec 14, 2017 2:07 pm

calitom wrote:
Dean wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Digging at someone for their job is a bit lame though.
Especially when there are so many better reasons to dig at you.


It's the equivalent of the 'Shine my fuckin' shoes!' scene in Goodfellas...


Liotta was sexy as fook in that film but Jo Pesci's character put me off watching it more than once, so I have no recall of that scene.


It’s when Pesci stabs the guy, who has just come out of prison, in the neck with a pen...


funny how?...funny like a clown?? i amuse you??


Different scene mate...

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Guest » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:40 am

calitom wrote:
Guest wrote:
calitom wrote:a 28 yr old woman having sex with a 15 yr old boy gets 5 yrs in prison?? Crazy.
Sorry to upset the politically correct on here.But there is a 99% chance that
the boy is bigger and stronger than the woman so there is no forcible aspect to it.


barron trump is a 6 footer, would you say it was ok for a 28 year old woman to use him for sex?

he is 11 douchenozzle


i was just using your criteria, tom, about a 99% chance the boy is bigger and stronger than the woman so there is no forcible aspect to it. you were the one who said size was the issue here.

so you've established that 11 is too young, even if he is a big strong lad, but 15 is just fine and dandy. where do you stand on 14 year old boys toking a bit of weed with a 28 year old woman & then being used for sex by her? how about 13 year olds? 12 too young?

Re: Female Paedo

Post by calitom » Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:41 am

Dean wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Digging at someone for their job is a bit lame though.
Especially when there are so many better reasons to dig at you.


It's the equivalent of the 'Shine my fuckin' shoes!' scene in Goodfellas...


Liotta was sexy as fook in that film but Jo Pesci's character put me off watching it more than once, so I have no recall of that scene.


It’s when Pesci stabs the guy, who has just come out of prison, in the neck with a pen...


funny how?...funny like a clown?? i amuse you??

Re: Female Paedo

Post by calitom » Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:41 am

Dean wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Digging at someone for their job is a bit lame though.
Especially when there are so many better reasons to dig at you.


It's the equivalent of the 'Shine my fuckin' shoes!' scene in Goodfellas...


Liotta was sexy as fook in that film but Jo Pesci's character put me off watching it more than once, so I have no recall of that scene.


It’s when Pesci stabs the guy, who has just come out of prison, in the neck with a pen...


funny how?...funny like a clown?? i amuse you??

Re: Female Paedo

Post by calitom » Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:40 am

Guest wrote:
calitom wrote:a 28 yr old woman having sex with a 15 yr old boy gets 5 yrs in prison?? Crazy.
Sorry to upset the politically correct on here.But there is a 99% chance that
the boy is bigger and stronger than the woman so there is no forcible aspect to it.


barron trump is a 6 footer, would you say it was ok for a 28 year old woman to use him for sex?

he is 11 douchenozzle

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Guest » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:55 pm

calitom wrote:a 28 yr old woman having sex with a 15 yr old boy gets 5 yrs in prison?? Crazy.
Sorry to upset the politically correct on here.But there is a 99% chance that
the boy is bigger and stronger than the woman so there is no forcible aspect to it.


barron trump is a 6 footer, would you say it was ok for a 28 year old woman to use him for sex?

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Lady Murasaki » Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:32 am

Lol, thanks for reminding me of a scene I wanted to forget :ooer:

My favourite scene was when Liotta came home late from doing gangster stuff to his wife and her mum nagging him, so he walks straight back out of the house laughing his head off. So funny!

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Dean » Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:31 pm

Lady Murasaki wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Digging at someone for their job is a bit lame though.
Especially when there are so many better reasons to dig at you.


It's the equivalent of the 'Shine my fuckin' shoes!' scene in Goodfellas...


Liotta was sexy as fook in that film but Jo Pesci's character put me off watching it more than once, so I have no recall of that scene.


It’s when Pesci stabs the guy, who has just come out of prison, in the neck with a pen...

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Lady Murasaki » Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:28 pm

Stooo wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:Digging at someone for their job is a bit lame though.
Especially when there are so many better reasons to dig at you.


It's the equivalent of the 'Shine my fuckin' shoes!' scene in Goodfellas...


Liotta was sexy as fook in that film but Jo Pesci's character put me off watching it more than once, so I have no recall of that scene.

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Lady Murasaki » Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:25 pm

Trapper John wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Lady Murasaki wrote:
No, it appears to be aimed at TJ.


Ah, my bad, I misread the quotes there. :oops:


At first I thought it was aimed at Stooo, but it's not.


I bet you could kick yourself now. :gigglesnshit:


Indeed. :gigglesnshit:

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Guest » Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:31 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
would a 28 year old guy plying a 15 year old girl with weed then using her for sex be just as laudable?


Not if it was one of their daughters and even if she was well beyond her years mentally, the dumbfucks! :off head:


the mindset of some of them is terrifying.

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Guest » Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:30 pm

McAz wrote:
Major Starbold wrote:I wonder if anyone asked the lad if he enjoyed himself or it has harmed him?????

Irrelevant - fucking children is illegal and immoral - don't do it, and don't make excuses for it.


you wonder what cut off age the 'major' has for adults fucking children, if he has got a cut off age for it, that is.

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Guest » Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:27 pm

Major Starbold wrote:I wonder if anyone asked the lad if he enjoyed himself or it has harmed him?????



I can't understand why they allow you to ply your trade on here. The authorities should be informed :hand:

Re: Female Paedo

Post by Guest » Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:24 pm

Guest wrote:
would a 28 year old guy plying a 15 year old girl with weed then using her for sex be just as laudable?


Not if it was one of their daughters and even if she was well beyond her years mentally, the dumbfucks! :off head:

Re: Female Paedo

Post by McAz » Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:07 pm

Major Starbold wrote:I wonder if anyone asked the lad if he enjoyed himself or it has harmed him?????

Irrelevant - fucking children is illegal and immoral - don't do it, and don't make excuses for it.

Top

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group