Meghan.

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
Smilies
:gigglesnshit: :eyebrow: :header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :NAA: :canny: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :dafinger: :pukeup: :Hiya: :bored: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Meghan.

Re: Meghan.

Post by Punk » Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:42 pm

Canary wrote:
measurer wrote:Nice one Punk, not to mention Harry also has his father's piggy eyes, and that's no insult - just plain FACT.


And he's got his dad's blue eyes too, FWIW. :thumbsup: Hewit's eyes are brown.

I'm certain that a comprehensive DNA test (discreetly done) cleared this issue decades ago anyway. It's done & dusted.
But some diehards still pursue this illegitimacy line, just to take a pop at Harry. For reasons. :ooer:


Hiya Cans,

Get them on Jeremy Kyle. :leer:

Re: Meghan.

Post by measurer » Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:17 pm

Yep, pisses me off if honest. I'd say he looks more like Charles anyday, plus as you say, I'm sure the Royal family torched any suspicion they themselves may have had years ago.

I'd just like to add to OP, that Meghan is half white, and half african american . Her father is Dutch/Irish and mother African american. So, the babies will more than likely have a whiter skin because of this,,,,,,,but you never know. They will make lovely babies. Even the Royal family show that colour should be no divide. Good for them, I say.

Re: Meghan.

Post by Text » Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:04 pm

measurer wrote:Nice one Punk, not to mention Harry also has his father's piggy eyes, and that's no insult - just plain FACT.


And he's got his dad's blue eyes too, FWIW. :thumbsup: Hewit's eyes are brown.

I'm certain that a comprehensive DNA test (discreetly done) cleared this issue decades ago anyway. It's done & dusted.
But some diehards still pursue this illegitimacy line, just to take a pop at Harry. For reasons. :ooer:

Re: Meghan.

Post by measurer » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:02 pm

Nice one Punk, not to mention Harry also has his father's piggy eyes, and that's no insult - just plain FACT.

Re: Megan

Post by Punk » Tue Jan 16, 2018 4:36 pm

Major wrote:
Guest wrote:starbold swore this oath of allegiance when he joined the army & he ought to know no-one is ever released from that oath ...

I... swear by Almighty God (do solemnly, and truly declare and affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will, as in duty bound, honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors, in Person, Crown and Dignity


prince harry is one of her heirs ...


One of Hewitts more like.


Twat.

I suggest you look at the gingers in the Spencer family. :whistle:

Image

Re: Megan

Post by Vam » Tue Jan 16, 2018 3:57 pm

Major wrote:
Guest wrote:starbold swore this oath of allegiance when he joined the army & he ought to know no-one is ever released from that oath ...

I... swear by Almighty God (do solemnly, and truly declare and affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will, as in duty bound, honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors, in Person, Crown and Dignity


prince harry is one of her heirs ...


One of Hewitts more like.


I've met him a few times when he was fronting a restaurant out here. The guy is a spaced-out, shambolic wreck these days :shake head:

And btw, I think you're wrong... :roll:

Re: Megan

Post by McAz » Tue Jan 16, 2018 3:55 pm

Major wrote:
Guest wrote:starbold swore this oath of allegiance when he joined the army & he ought to know no-one is ever released from that oath ...

I... swear by Almighty God (do solemnly, and truly declare and affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will, as in duty bound, honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors, in Person, Crown and Dignity


prince harry is one of her heirs ...


One of Hewitts more like.


Are you saying that Prince Harry is not a legal heir starbold?

Re: Megan

Post by Major » Tue Jan 16, 2018 3:52 pm

Guest wrote:starbold swore this oath of allegiance when he joined the army & he ought to know no-one is ever released from that oath ...

I... swear by Almighty God (do solemnly, and truly declare and affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will, as in duty bound, honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors, in Person, Crown and Dignity


prince harry is one of her heirs ...


One of Hewitts more like.

Re: Megan

Post by Punk » Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:08 pm

Guest wrote:starbold swore this oath of allegiance when he joined the army & he ought to know no-one is ever released from that oath ...

I... swear by Almighty God (do solemnly, and truly declare and affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will, as in duty bound, honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors, in Person, Crown and Dignity


prince harry is one of her heirs ...


Log in Punk :gigglesnshit:

Re: Meghan.

Post by Guest » Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:40 pm

Guest wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
Canary wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:

She does glamour (did) not topless

there's enough actual stuff to dislike her for without exaggerating her 'career'



I'd never heard of her before today.
So, ... googled her name and the first hit (albeit from the Sun, a shitty rag, I know) was that she was ''a topless model''.

> >
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/52655 ... an-markle/
The very first hit I got was the above link, and the very first sentence (in bold, above the pic) was "Jo Marnley topless model"
:dunno:
:dunno:


yeah the sun, that bastion of truth, as I said she does glamour not topless, she's got fucking awful views, her career however is irrelevant

and if you'd never heard of her before today how have you come to the conclusion that she's popular?


Glamour modelling's a bit of a catch-all, though. It can include underwear, topless and full nudity. Are you thinking of 1940s style Hollywood photos when actresses are shot in high-quality, wearing designer dresses and often sent out as prints to their fans?
Topless modelling for the Sun etc. is often described as glamour by the participants, it's probably to make it seem a bit less seedy and a bit more respectable.
I'd never heard of Jo Marnley until the story of the UKIP leader and her emerged around Xmas, so I don't know what kind of modelling she did, but surely the main matter is the racist comments she's made.


What’s seedy about topless modelling anyway? If a woman chooses to show off her body and is attractive enough to have people want to see it and to make a living out of it, more power to her. We’re so fucking uptight and prudish in this country.

Re: Meghan.

Post by Guest » Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:31 pm

Maybe somone can post some of these glamour shots so we can make our own mind up about her. :drool:

Her views I cannot stand but there’s no denying she’s at least physically very attractive.

Re: Meghan.

Post by Guest » Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:21 pm

HobbitFeet wrote:
Canary wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:

She does glamour (did) not topless

there's enough actual stuff to dislike her for without exaggerating her 'career'



I'd never heard of her before today.
So, ... googled her name and the first hit (albeit from the Sun, a shitty rag, I know) was that she was ''a topless model''.

> >
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/52655 ... an-markle/
The very first hit I got was the above link, and the very first sentence (in bold, above the pic) was "Jo Marnley topless model"
:dunno:
:dunno:


yeah the sun, that bastion of truth, as I said she does glamour not topless, she's got fucking awful views, her career however is irrelevant

and if you'd never heard of her before today how have you come to the conclusion that she's popular?


Glamour modelling's a bit of a catch-all, though. It can include underwear, topless and full nudity. Are you thinking of 1940s style Hollywood photos when actresses are shot in high-quality, wearing designer dresses and often sent out as prints to their fans?
Topless modelling for the Sun etc. is often described as glamour by the participants, it's probably to make it seem a bit less seedy and a bit more respectable.
I'd never heard of Jo Marnley until the story of the UKIP leader and her emerged around Xmas, so I don't know what kind of modelling she did, but surely the main matter is the racist comments she's made.

Re: Meghan.

Post by Vam » Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:17 pm

NastyNickers wrote:
Vam wrote:
Yeah...I forgot about the stick it's holding in its hand.

Tosser :roll:


They are tying hard to kick up some shit tonight. Best ignored.


Yep...as is the kissy-kissy gushing in response... boak :pukeup:

Re: Meghan.

Post by Text » Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:13 pm

Guest wrote:
Canary wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
Canary wrote:
HobbitFeet wrote:
She does glamour (did) not topless

there's enough actual stuff to dislike her for without exaggerating her 'career'



I'd never heard of her before today.
So, ... googled her name and the first hit (albeit from the Sun, a shitty rag, I know) was that she was ''a topless model''.

> >
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/52655 ... an-markle/
The very first hit I got was the above link, and the very first sentence (in bold, above the pic) was "Jo Marnley topless model"
:dunno:
:dunno:


yeah the sun, that bastion of truth, as I said she does glamour not topless, she's got fucking awful views, her career however is irrelevant

and if you'd never heard of her before today how have you come to the conclusion that she's popular?


You're hard work. No one is saying her career is relevant, I'm simply going off macaz's post which says she is plain looking. So I found an alternative reason why she is so popular. ''Popular'' as in she's all over twitter and everyone seems to have an opinion on this.

Yes the Sun is rubbish, but for a petty, inconsequential topic like this (Jo Marney), I CBA to research her on better newspapers. It's not like we're discussing atomic weapons.

It was obvious to most of us what you meant Canns and it was a good point, but Hobbit has a stick up her arse when it comes to you because of Vams strange dislike of you. That’s all it is. You could argue that night follows day and she’d probably find some reason to disagree or have a go at you. :cuppaT:



Oh it's OK. I do get the odd left field interjection from HF. I don't mind at all, cos I'm a tough old bird.
And as I said earlier I like the way HF stands up to bigots. Thank you guesty, you are very kind, your kindness comes thru in your post. xxx :Hiya:

Re: Meghan.

Post by NastyNickers » Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:12 pm

Vam wrote:
Yeah...I forgot about the stick it's holding in its hand.

Tosser :roll:


They are tying hard to kick up some shit tonight. Best ignored.

Top