by art0hur0moh » Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:21 pm
why should the state or education system gain funding when Child labor laws reduced household income. and Parents, for the most part, are the primary and secondary education system of the vast majority of Children? so when it is claimed the state pays for educating the child, it actually relies on no income appreciation on courses that have no intrinsic value other than creating a society of elitism where the elite are not quite elite as they think, hence never acquiring an income over $15,000 p/a. students having to work to fund their education in a field they may not be capable or competent doing. first a crash course in the deep end for a few months doing what they think then a crash course in doing what they are Good at, then they have all information necessary to make an informed choice! doing what You are Good at gives a better return than doing something You enjoy.
why should the state or education system gain funding when Child labor laws reduced household income. and Parents, for the most part, are the primary and secondary education system of the vast majority of Children? so when it is claimed the state pays for educating the child, it actually relies on no income appreciation on courses that have no intrinsic value other than creating a society of elitism where the elite are not quite elite as they think, hence never acquiring an income over $15,000 p/a. students having to work to fund their education in a field they may not be capable or competent doing. first a crash course in the deep end for a few months doing what they think then a crash course in doing what they are Good at, then they have all information necessary to make an informed choice! doing what You are Good at gives a better return than doing something You enjoy.
