by Dean » Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:25 pm
Stooo wrote:Dean wrote:Stooo wrote:Kat wrote:Ash had over all control of fh I too spoke to ton and dt loads of times about this but mainly dt s health I've not spoke to ton since. Just after dt passed away from what I remember micky had it given to him but trop stuck the boot in
Dean's moved on from that for some reason
What more was there to say after proving you can have more than one founder account? You said it’s a singular account, I proved it wasn’t.
What more can I say?
You posted a line of code.
There is only one founder account for each site that has full accountability. Ash didn't ever hand over full control to FH to Micky, Wendy teased him for ages about it and then closed the place.
God I'm bored with this now.
No, you can have more than one founder account. I’ve posted the proof already. Do you need me to post some more proof?
Nobody said Micky was ever handed ‘full control’ of FH. I said he was a founder Admin, which he was. You’re arguing against points I haven’t made just for some sort of ‘win’
[quote="Stooo"][quote="Dean"][quote="Stooo"][quote="Kat"]Ash had over all control of fh I too spoke to ton and dt loads of times about this but mainly dt s health I've not spoke to ton since. Just after dt passed away from what I remember micky had it given to him but trop stuck the boot in[/quote]
Dean's moved on from that for some reason :dunno:[/quote]
What more was there to say after proving you can have more than one founder account? You said it’s a singular account, I proved it wasn’t.
What more can I say?[/quote]
You posted a line of code.
There is only one founder account for each site that has full accountability. Ash didn't ever hand over full control to FH to Micky, Wendy teased him for ages about it and then closed the place.
God I'm bored with this now.[/quote]
No, you can have more than one founder account. I’ve posted the proof already. Do you need me to post some more proof?
Nobody said Micky was ever handed ‘full control’ of FH. I said he was a founder Admin, which he was. You’re arguing against points I haven’t made just for some sort of ‘win’