Dogs Sleeping Forum

Raggamuffin wrote:

Snookerballs wrote:

Major wrote:Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

Instead of venting your bile on Katie Price you should be condemning Harveys Father who has disowned his son and does not contribute to his upkeep .

Katie Price is now bankrupt but she is using the Media Publicity (as her job has always been a media celebrity) along with friends to ensure that Harvey has a decent style of life , if she did not publicise the problem no one would be aware of the condition .

She had loads of money, so what did she do with it? She had more than enough to bring up kids without resorting to talking about him to the entire world.

Snookerballs wrote:

Major wrote:Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

Instead of venting your bile on Katie Price you should be condemning Harveys Father who has disowned his son and does not contribute to his upkeep .

Katie Price is now bankrupt but she is using the Media Publicity (as her job has always been a media celebrity) along with friends to ensure that Harvey has a decent style of life , if she did not publicise the problem no one would be aware of the condition .

kaz wrote:

Snookerballs wrote:

Major wrote:Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

Instead of venting your bile on Katie Price you should be condemning Harveys Father who has disowned his son and does not contribute to his upkeep .

Katie Price is now bankrupt but she is using the Media Publicity (as her job has always been a media celebrity) along with friends to ensure that Harvey has a decent style of life , if she did not publicise the problem no one would be aware of the condition .

Except he didn't, KP refused all contact between Dwight and Harvey, then it was felt that Harvey's behaviour would deteriorate if they met. Dwight's paying maintenance as well.

Nucks wrote:

Text wrote:

Nucks wrote:
I absolutely agree that he should be off limits, and KP should've proceeded to prosecute them using the malicious communications act, NOT paraded him on tele for attention.

Why should he be ''off limits''? Why should Katie pretend he doesn't exist?
It's only natural for people to talk about their families. You've just talked about yours.

I didn't say she should pretend he doesn't exist.

He should be off-limits re trolling on Twitter, etc., not that she shouldn't ever talk about him.

.SF. wrote:

Text wrote: I used to criticise her for being so attention seeking - and self destructive too. But when she started getting too much unfair criticism, I became a staunch supporter.

Did this conversion happen gradually or was it a road to Damascus turning point in your life?

kaz wrote:

Snookerballs wrote:

Major wrote:Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

Instead of venting your bile on Katie Price you should be condemning Harveys Father who has disowned his son and does not contribute to his upkeep .

Katie Price is now bankrupt but she is using the Media Publicity (as her job has always been a media celebrity) along with friends to ensure that Harvey has a decent style of life , if she did not publicise the problem no one would be aware of the condition .

Except he didn't, KP refused all contact between Dwight and Harvey, then it was felt that Harvey's behaviour would deteriorate if they met. Dwight's paying maintenance as well.

Snookerballs wrote:

Major wrote:Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

Instead of venting your bile on Katie Price you should be condemning Harveys Father who has disowned his son and does not contribute to his upkeep .

Katie Price is now bankrupt but she is using the Media Publicity (as her job has always been a media celebrity) along with friends to ensure that Harvey has a decent style of life , if she did not publicise the problem no one would be aware of the condition .

Major wrote:Price is not doing Harvey any favours by PUSHING him into the limelight.

George wrote:

Guest wrote:The bullying of Harvey is not the fault of Katie Price. It is the fault of the grown adults choosing to mock a disabled child.
If they dislike the woman to that extent they can target her alone.
Bullying is always the fault of the bully and there is no excuse for being abusive to a child no matter who their parents are.

Absolutely. I am not a particular fan of abusing anyone online, make criticisms, call them out on their nonsense, disagree etc is all fine but some of the really nasty stuff, like wishing death or physical harm or not acceptable imo

Holly wrote:Guest wrote:

He deserves privacy yes. .but does he want it? You seem to want it for him. Getting out and about and interacting with people can only help with his development.
I think he enjoys being out with his Mum and it makes others uncomfortable to see him. That is the real issue . His size and illness are not pleasing to the eye, so people feel embarrassed.
Most kids rarely want privacy ,they prefer day trips and being out with their family. Harvey's no different.

Getting out and about with his family and interacting with people is one thing, parading him around on TV is another. If he was my child and he keeps getting bullied, I would remove him from that situation.

He deserves privacy yes. .but does he want it? You seem to want it for him. Getting out and about and interacting with people can only help with his development.
I think he enjoys being out with his Mum and it makes others uncomfortable to see him. That is the real issue . His size and illness are not pleasing to the eye, so people feel embarrassed.
Most kids rarely want privacy ,they prefer day trips and being out with their family. Harvey's no different.

Holly wrote:

drum wrote:

Nucks wrote:

Text wrote:

Nucks wrote:
I absolutely agree that he should be off limits, and KP should've proceeded to prosecute them using the malicious communications act, NOT paraded him on tele for attention.

Why should he be ''off limits''? Why should Katie pretend he doesn't exist?
It's only natural for people to talk about their families. You've just talked about yours.

I didn't say she should pretend he doesn't exist.

He should be off-limits re trolling on Twitter, etc., not that she shouldn't ever talk about him.

The trolling of Harvey is awful. He gets it because of who his Mum is. None of her other kids get trolled like Harvey does. That just shows peoples level Also, his father being who he is, that keeps Harvey in the spotlight too.

I often wonder what goes though his head (DY) he should never have abandoned that boy , that shame is on him forever, he could have been a father to him regardless of Katie Price.
I've read he hasn't been in touch with the hospital or Harvey . I don't blame her for shaming him either, I'd do and have done similar in the past. We don't make these children ourselves.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/1 ... ke-harvey/

I agree, the bullying and horrible abuse he's getting on social media is horrific. How does that poor, harmless, sick boy deserve that?
I do blame Katie Price for it. To bring his illness out into the public to bring attention to his illness so people can understand is one thing, to constantly parade him around like he's some side show is another. She has a youtube channel where she keeps showing him off, I don't think it's right, that boy deserves privacy...as for his father, well he truly deserves public condemnation, he is a disgrace.