Dogs Sleeping Forum

Companies not just workers join Global Climate Strike - first example bellow:

[url]https://nugenaudio.com/climate-strike/?src=null_mb_int_nl_sept19[/url]

Here's an example of the bullshit we are subjected to a lot of the time.
[b]David Attenborough[/b] is one of the most respected men on global telly.
When the BBC backtrack on this they say it wasn't Attenborough's Fault but the production crews.
Is that bullshit or what?
Attenborough must have known he was broadcasting bullshit around the world and that shit would stick in the minds of millions maybe billions.

[b]BBC backs down on David Attenborough's climate change statistics[/b]

Sir David, 86, speaking over footage of Mount Kilimanjaro, made the assertion that "some parts of the continent have become 3.5C hotter in the past 20 years".

Given that since 1850 global temperatures have risen by about 0.8C, causing widespread concern, it was seen as a shocking assertion.

Bloggers and environmentalists expressed their surprise and questioned the scientific evidence behind the claim.

But the BBC initially defended it. They said it was drawn from a report by Oxfam and the New Economics Foundation., but in turn this report suggested the figure had come from a report by Christian Aid.

In a footnote that report suggested the claim had been made at a climate change conference in Dakar in 2004.

[i]Unable to back up the assertion, the BBC last night deleted the words from the repeat of the episode.[/i]

Instead the corporation played orchestral music after Sir David said: "Africa's climate is certainly changing." Instead there was only orchestral music in the background.

The next few words from the original broadcast, referring to the 3.5C rise, were missing.



Just a litle accident a little mistake .... bullshit.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/climatechange/9861908/BBC-backs-down-on-David-Attenboroughs-climate-change-statistics.html

David Bellamy was extremely popular and in the full glaring lights of media attention and worship so if they can get rid of him so easily can you imagine how teachers scientists etc feel should they dare say it's all bollox?
You say the right thing or your career is over the money stops flowing in and you're blacklisted.

[size=150]David Bellamy tells of moment he was "frozen out" of BBC[/size]
[i]David Bellamy has described how the BBC “froze him out” when he dismissed global warming as “poppycock”.[/i]

A well respected tv scientific personality gone just like that for not sticking to what we're told to believe.
He spoke out against an agenda and whooosh bye bye.
That is not how freedom works how democracy works but that's how it works all to often.
What is so scary about David Bellamy in an open and free society?
That's not how debate works.
Not how education works.
It's not how science works.
It's how the powers that be work though.
He got the same treatment journalists like John Pilger got for speaking the truth to power for not bowing down and prestituting himself.

[i]The 80-yearold environmentalist and former broadcaster, admitted that his scepticism signalled the end of his career as he had known it.

“From that moment, I really wasn’t welcome at the BBC,” he said.

“They froze me out, because I don’t believe in global warming. My career dried up. I was thrown out of my own conservation groups and I got spat at in London.”

Mr Bellamy said things first began to change in 1996 when he spoke out against wind farms during one of his regular appearances on Blue Peter.

“That was the beginning really,” he told the Daily Mail. “From that moment, I was not welcome at the BBC.” [/i]https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/9817181/David-Bellamy-tells-of-moment-he-was-frozen-out-of-BBC.html

[quote="Rolluplostinspace"]If they block the sun that's solar power screwed.[/quote]

Maybe it's to help out Elon Musk's solar panels. :gigglesnshit:

And never trust Bill Gates!

[size=150]MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: Believing CO2 controls the climate ‘is pretty close to believing in magic’[/size]
https://www.climatedepot.com/2017/05/01/mit-climate-scientist-dr-richard-lindzen-believing-co2-controls-the-climate-is-pretty-close-to-believing-in-magic/

If they block the sun that's solar power screwed.

[size=150]Bill Gates backing plan to stop climate change by blocking out the sun[/size]
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/technology/bill-gates-backing-plan-to-stop-climate-change-by-blocking-out-the-sun/ar-AAFKQVN

The earth does not move around the sun in a circle so the distances from it are always varying.

[size=150]NASA[/size] admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, and NOT because of SUVs and fossil fuels
Friday, August 30, 2019 by: Ethan Huff
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-08-30-nasa-admits-climate-change-not-caused-by-suvs-fossil-fuels.html

These dates are off the top of my head but I know they're near enough correct and the 2020 one is one hundred percent accurate.

Scientists told the world that around 1946 we would enter a cooling period which would end around 1973.
I was a kid in the 50's and 60's and every family had a steel and timber sledge in the shed or hung on a wall because every winter was snowmen frost icicles dragging the weekly veg shop home on the sledge.
1973 arrives and the winters start getting milder and the scientists said this warming period that had now begun would end and go back to a cooling period .... around 20 20 .... well here we are at 2020 will our science prove to be correct or the false news media?
In the warming period of the 70's the news was we might be heading for another ice age!
The last half decent cooling period lasted from 1300 to 1850 so that's a pretty lengthy one but not sure what the MSM have to say about it.
Thing is the climate never stops changing warming cooling wet dry despite whether or not we have gas fired power stations and diesel cars.
What triggered the big ice age that covered the northern hemisphere?
It wasn't man and his machines.
We are still in that ice age at the later stages of it.
Take core samples in the arctic circle and you find the evidence of lush forests teeming with animal life.
So the earth before the age age was a lot warmer and greener than it is now.
The poles are still covered in ice often miles thick meaning all the ice has not yet melted meaning we are still in that ice age.

By Samson Reiny

NASA's Earth Science News Team

[size=150]Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds[/size]

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

Green leaves use energy from sunlight through photosynthesis to chemically combine carbon dioxide drawn in from the air with water and nutrients tapped from the ground to produce sugars, which are the main source of food, fiber and fuel for life on Earth. Studies have shown that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide increase photosynthesis, spurring plant growth.

However, carbon dioxide fertilization isn’t the only cause of increased plant growth—nitrogen, land cover change and climate change by way of global temperature, precipitation and sunlight changes all contribute to the greening effect. To determine the extent of carbon dioxide’s contribution, researchers ran the data for carbon dioxide and each of the other variables in isolation through several computer models that mimic the plant growth observed in the satellite data.

Results showed that carbon dioxide fertilization explains 70 percent of the greening effect, said co-author Ranga Myneni, a professor in the Dep>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth

[quote="Fletch"][quote="Rolluplostinspace"]It's more a matter of pay people to look after the rain forests it's the cheapest sanest option long term.
Telling me having a log fire and driving my vehicles is to blame is bollox when you're ripping the lungs of the world out!
Those forests and new ones should be growing especially with the increased CO2 available and they will drink in the CO2 and return oxygen.
Everyone should be planting stuff that breathes CO2 in and oxygen out.[/quote]

That's the bit I don't get Jack. I learnt about trees/plants taking in CO2 and emitting oxygen in school...a long time ago. How in the hell have people forgotten or never actually known this happens? It's the obvious solution of something that is produced naturally and has been for, well all time to date.

Despite this we have rapacious corporations ripping out forests for grazing cattle, growing stuff or for it's hardwoods. We have councils removing trees, areas cleared for corporate house builders, gardens being a thing of the past. None or next to none in new builds, sold off for another house in older large garden properties or paved over with a patio heater, barbecue and a place for cars.

:dunno:[/quote]
And then blame me and you for wrecking the atmosphere.

[quote="Rolluplostinspace"]It's more a matter of pay people to look after the rain forests it's the cheapest sanest option long term.
Telling me having a log fire and driving my vehicles is to blame is bollox when you're ripping the lungs of the world out!
Those forests and new ones should be growing especially with the increased CO2 available and they will drink in the CO2 and return oxygen.
Everyone should be planting stuff that breathes CO2 in and oxygen out.[/quote]

That's the bit I don't get Jack. I learnt about trees/plants taking in CO2 and emitting oxygen in school...a long time ago. How in the hell have people forgotten or never actually known this happens? It's the obvious solution of something that is produced naturally and has been for, well all time to date.

Despite this we have rapacious corporations ripping out forests for grazing cattle, growing stuff or for it's hardwoods. We have councils removing trees, areas cleared for corporate house builders, gardens being a thing of the past. None or next to none in new builds, sold off for another house in older large garden properties or paved over with a patio heater, barbecue and a place for cars.

:dunno:

It's more a matter of pay people to look after the rain forests it's the cheapest sanest option long term.
Telling me having a log fire and driving my vehicles is to blame is bollox when you're ripping the lungs of the world out!
Those forests and new ones should be growing especially with the increased CO2 available and they will drink in the CO2 and return oxygen.
Everyone should be planting stuff that breathes CO2 in and oxygen out.

[quote="McAz"][quote="Rolluplostinspace"]The evidence is suggesting the Amazon fires have been deliberate corporate agricultural acts.[/quote]
Yes, heard that on the radio - fucking disgraceful.[/quote]

[b]Devastating Fires in Bolivia: A Political Tool[/b]
[i]Uncontrolled fires linked to agricultural expansions are being used as a political tool during this election year in Bolivia and are causing catastrophic consequences
[/i]
The fires in the lowlands of Bolivia have burnt more than 1 million hectares, affecting forest reserves, protected areas and national parks. These fires represent the environmental tensions generated by the agricultural extractivism (McKay, 2018) that the drives the Bolivian government, which in recent years has favoured the agribusiness and livestock sectors, through laws and political agreements and, generating an agro-state alliance based around land occupation as a source of wealth.

In this light, we can see that the fires and deforestation that is occurring within Bolivia is matching up with global agricultural trends, where the agro-state alliance obeys the demands of the multinational food companies, who dictate that monocultures should be grown in the Southern Cone countries. At the same time, the model is used politically by the government who can give land to farmers in protected areas, ignoring the significance of the land and the irreparable ecological damage.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/devastating-fires-bolivia-political-tool/5688627

Corporate rule. :shake head: