by art0hur0moh » Sat Jan 12, 2019 2:48 pm
Loony Lou wrote:That is ridiculous and only serves to give credence to Donald’s fake news claims and besides which we all know that he worked on the apprentice and not for the Russians.
What bitch commenced this total bollocks?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/authors/our-foreign-staff/ in other words, no source journalism so individuals can't be held liable for defamation of character! I am more interested in the former, former (something like that) justice who tried to lead investigations into corruption and was imprisoned on invented charges. the claim of collusion can easily be validated, they sit across from each Other during negotiations and meet during the gee whatever summits. there isn't a single foreign office that isn't collusive: secret agreements including fraud or denying inalienable rights. sanctions against russia after agreements involving syria and the ukraine where negated ( is that the right word?). not followed through on.
[quote="Loony Lou"]That is ridiculous and only serves to give credence to Donald’s fake news claims and besides which we all know that he worked on the apprentice and not for the Russians. :gigglesnshit:
What bitch commenced this total bollocks?[/quote]
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/authors/our-foreign-staff/ in other words, no source journalism so individuals can't be held liable for defamation of character! I am more interested in the former, former (something like that) justice who tried to lead investigations into corruption and was imprisoned on invented charges. the claim of collusion can easily be validated, they sit across from each Other during negotiations and meet during the gee whatever summits. there isn't a single foreign office that isn't collusive: secret agreements including fraud or denying inalienable rights. sanctions against russia after agreements involving syria and the ukraine where negated ( is that the right word?). not followed through on.
