DS and DTV Part 67.

Post a reply

:
In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed below into the text field underneath.
Smilies
:header: :woteva: :yikes: :smilin: :bawlin: :wubbers: :canny: :nelix: :trollface: :wurms: :doomed: :wubwub: :leer: :grrrrr: :cuppaT: :more beer: :ooer: :whistle: :link: :cronos: :whogives: :dafinger: :Lucia: :pukeup: :Hiya: :paranoid: :bored: :gigglesnshit: :Wiiiine!: :choc: :flog: :twirl: :pmsl: :brickwall: :dunno: :pointlaugh: :cheers: :yess: :bum: :snooty: :thud: :shell: :shake head: :thumbsup: :hap: :hand: :shame: :popcorn: :monkey: :off head: :bell: :shoot: :mrgreen: :roll: :oops: :razz: :laughing: :cool: :kinell: :wink: :drool: :grub: :awesome: :slap: :again?: :burfday: :srs?:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: DS and DTV Part 67.

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by jra » Tue Oct 17, 2017 12:28 am

Guest wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
jra wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Guest wrote:I think Canuckle is missing the real point here. No one needs to police the whole forum, that’s just being silly, but when you have plenty of threads where you get a load of victim blaming, and no one gives a shit it’s a bit rich all of a sudden for many on DS to make out there care about it. It rings very hollow and looks like it’s more about them trying to point score against posters they have a grudge with than really giving a shit about victims of sexual or physical assault. You’re either against it or not.

Scottie was mentioned earlier as an example and I agree. He only has a problem when it’s JP and when it suits his agenda.


So is there a quote from Scottie where he is victim blaming in another thread?


If you can find it, alert/report it. If scottie can get away with, why can't I.

I've rarely alerted/reported posts on DS in the past, but from now on I'll be alerting/reporting anything negative said about me on DS, now that the gauntlet has been thrown down. Two can play that game.


You do realise how childish that makes you sound?



I think the answer would be 'no'.


I had a few posts removed today from muggins and hobbit. Work in progress.

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:25 pm

Guest wrote:I knew jra was lying!


I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. He's imagined it.

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:15 pm

I knew jra was lying!

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:59 pm

Canucklehead wrote:
jra wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Guest wrote:I think Canuckle is missing the real point here. No one needs to police the whole forum, that’s just being silly, but when you have plenty of threads where you get a load of victim blaming, and no one gives a shit it’s a bit rich all of a sudden for many on DS to make out there care about it. It rings very hollow and looks like it’s more about them trying to point score against posters they have a grudge with than really giving a shit about victims of sexual or physical assault. You’re either against it or not.

Scottie was mentioned earlier as an example and I agree. He only has a problem when it’s JP and when it suits his agenda.


So is there a quote from Scottie where he is victim blaming in another thread?


If you can find it, alert/report it. If scottie can get away with, why can't I.

I've rarely alerted/reported posts on DS in the past, but from now on I'll be alerting/reporting anything negative said about me on DS, now that the gauntlet has been thrown down. Two can play that game.


You do realise how childish that makes you sound?


It’s not really though is it. Considering the alert button is there for a reason and the mods want people to tell them about abuse in general let alone the snidey and personal shit JRA gets from Scottie and a few others I’d say he’s been stupid not alerting the mods to the trolls before now.

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:42 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:Aint she a bit old and large to be a mother again?


Only a bitter, butt-ugly chav would say something like that.

And by 'butt-ugly', I don't (necessarily) mean what you look like.

When all else fails, knock someone for their looks, eh? :roll:

Not sure you come out of this looking any better. The guest calling Safi fat or old is well out of order but calling them a butt ugly chav makes you just as bad.

Yet Another pot kettle moment for Vam.


At least Vam’s intentions were good, if not put in the best way.

The spineless twat who keeps digging at Safi is just a cunt. :hand:

If they had balls they’d say who they were. But then, I have my suspicions. :more beer:





So guest, I have my suspicions who you are. Why not tell me and confirm it?
You fucking numpty.

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:10 pm

Oh you couldn’t be more wrong! For a start I don’t have the right anatomy to be GD.

TBH I’m just bored of sad tossers picking on people who don’t even come on dogs, so can’t defend themselves. It’s like the playground at times.

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Bored of gds attention seeking guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:49 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Vam wrote:
Only a bitter, butt-ugly chav would say something like that.

And by 'butt-ugly', I don't (necessarily) mean what you look like.

When all else fails, knock someone for their looks, eh? :roll:

Not sure you come out of this looking any better. The guest calling Safi fat or old is well out of order but calling them a butt ugly chav makes you just as bad.

Yet Another pot kettle moment for Vam.


At least Vam’s intentions were good, if not put in the best way.

The spineless twat who keeps digging at Safi is just a cunt. :hand:

If they had balls they’d say who they were. But then, I have my suspicions. :more beer:


...lol said anon guest.


Difference being, I’m not making snide, twatish digs about someone who doesn’t come on here and has never attacked anyone on here. To do that just makes the guest look like a tosser, as others have pointed out.

You calling someone else a tosser is irony at it's finest gd :bored:

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:19 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:Aint she a bit old and large to be a mother again?


Only a bitter, butt-ugly chav would say something like that.

And by 'butt-ugly', I don't (necessarily) mean what you look like.

When all else fails, knock someone for their looks, eh? :roll:

Not sure you come out of this looking any better. The guest calling Safi fat or old is well out of order but calling them a butt ugly chav makes you just as bad.

Yet Another pot kettle moment for Vam.


At least Vam’s intentions were good, if not put in the best way.

The spineless twat who keeps digging at Safi is just a cunt. :hand:

If they had balls they’d say who they were. But then, I have my suspicions. :more beer:


...lol said anon guest.


Difference being, I’m not making snide, twatish digs about someone who doesn’t come on here and has never attacked anyone on here. To do that just makes the guest look like a tosser, as others have pointed out.

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by charlie » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:00 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Gd is so desperate to ignore dogs, yet he just can't stop mentioning the place.

Hes like a kid with a desperate need for attention. I pity him.


Bit like Charlie and Keyser then. That desperate need for attention. A lot of these guest posts seem to be in the style of them...

Define “can’t stop mentioning”. How many times in the last week has he mentioned Dogs? Or are you just exaggerating for effect?


Yeah, that 'desperate need for attention' is intensified by the prolific posts I make on here and DS.

Nah, you're on the wind up matey, to say that a lot of guest posts seem to be in the style of myself and Keyser.

Yes, some of the guest posts are in the style of Keyser - but that's because he's posting currently as a guest!! As for me, Stooo will confirm that I haven't guest posted in a long time.

The last post I made on here, was on Oct 10th, and that was about Red kites....gosh that's horrifyingly attention seeking?!! Before that, was a post on Oct 6th on a thread about naming a song with a number in the title.

I make 0.25 posts a day on here - still horrifyingly attention seeking I know - and I really should seek help.... :shame:

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by laughing guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:55 pm

Time for a laff.
'Businessman' Trevgo, the fantasist who spends his days clocking up posts on DS and other forums, has come up with a belter and calculated that Brexit is costing him £5000-£7000 a month.
No doubt annoying, but as he says, he's not someone who looks at price tags when shopping.
And what he's forgotten is that those he constantly accuses of being thick, lazy and ignorant would probably think their vote was worthwhile if the obnoxious prick was just losing £5-£7 a month in the real world.
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussio ... -brexit/p1

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by jp761 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:15 pm

Guest wrote:DS and DTV and jp posting again and again Part 67
Oh.. I have someone to quote that is mostly why. ;)

Dinners up, time to get my burgers out, want one?

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:14 pm

Canucklehead wrote:
jra wrote:
Canucklehead wrote:
Guest wrote:I think Canuckle is missing the real point here. No one needs to police the whole forum, that’s just being silly, but when you have plenty of threads where you get a load of victim blaming, and no one gives a shit it’s a bit rich all of a sudden for many on DS to make out there care about it. It rings very hollow and looks like it’s more about them trying to point score against posters they have a grudge with than really giving a shit about victims of sexual or physical assault. You’re either against it or not.

Scottie was mentioned earlier as an example and I agree. He only has a problem when it’s JP and when it suits his agenda.


So is there a quote from Scottie where he is victim blaming in another thread?


If you can find it, alert/report it. If scottie can get away with, why can't I.

I've rarely alerted/reported posts on DS in the past, but from now on I'll be alerting/reporting anything negative said about me on DS, now that the gauntlet has been thrown down. Two can play that game.


You do realise how childish that makes you sound?



I think the answer would be 'no'.

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:13 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Vam wrote:
Guest wrote:Aint she a bit old and large to be a mother again?


Only a bitter, butt-ugly chav would say something like that.

And by 'butt-ugly', I don't (necessarily) mean what you look like.

When all else fails, knock someone for their looks, eh? :roll:

Not sure you come out of this looking any better. The guest calling Safi fat or old is well out of order but calling them a butt ugly chav makes you just as bad.

Yet Another pot kettle moment for Vam.


At least Vam’s intentions were good, if not put in the best way.

The spineless twat who keeps digging at Safi is just a cunt. :hand:

If they had balls they’d say who they were. But then, I have my suspicions. :more beer:


...lol said anon guest.

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by jp761 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:12 pm

Guest wrote:Is JP the Kanye of the internet? The 'big I am' posts are hilarious.
What posts?

If you want to see what keyboard warriors look like, look not further than a few guests. :thumbsup:

Re: DS and DTV Part 67.

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:12 pm

DS and DTV and jp posting again and again Part 67

Top