Sherlock Series 4

Sherlock Series 4

Postby Punk » Sun Jan 15, 2017 9:59 pm

4 and a half hours of pretentious bollocks
User avatar
Punk
 
Posts: 6902
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:10 pm
Location: Upper Sydenham

Re: Sherlock Series 4

Postby Nucks » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:57 pm

Are you referring to Mary as a ghost? :gigglesnshit: Have to say I'm not a fan of that.

As for how Sherlock solves cases, even the original stories rely on rare or unusual bits of evidence to break the case. Like a rare Turkish tobacco, bespoke perfume, etc.

I did like the Culverton Smith character as a villain, a few Savile-esque references there.
User avatar
Nucks
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:59 am
Location: Behind the curtains

Re: Sherlock Series 4

Postby Lady Murasaki » Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:42 am

Not as good as it was at the beginning, but this series wasn't as dire as series 3.
It's all over now though.
User avatar
Lady Murasaki
 
Posts: 37246
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Sherlock Series 4

Postby Nucks » Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:53 am

Just finished the last episode this morning and I agree, pretentious indeed. So is Eurus meant to be a magician, a witch, illuminati? :mrgreen: How on earth did she pull all that off? And we're supposed to believe she escaped to pretend she was 2 people then went back to Alcatraz? :gigglesnshit: The suspension of disbelief required for this piffle is off the charts.

I wonder if the writers are the type who might suggest those of us who didn't "get it" are just not clever enough? :roll:
User avatar
Nucks
 
Posts: 9032
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:59 am
Location: Behind the curtains

Re: Sherlock Series 4

Postby Lady Murasaki » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:04 am

Canucklehead wrote:Just finished the last episode this morning and I agree, pretentious indeed. So is Eurus meant to be a magician, a witch, illuminati? :mrgreen: How on earth did she pull all that off? And we're supposed to believe she escaped to pretend she was 2 people then went back to Alcatraz? :gigglesnshit: The suspension of disbelief required for this piffle is off the charts.

I wonder if the writers are the type who might suggest those of us who didn't "get it" are just not clever enough? :roll:


:pmsl: agree with all of that. I only watched it in the hope it would be as good as it first was and my younger son loves it. The things I've had to watch for him! I did draw the line at Harry Potter 3, couldn't take anymore.
User avatar
Lady Murasaki
 
Posts: 37246
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:46 pm


Return to TV And Radio

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests