Keyser wrote:52 pages and not one achievement yet.
But I suppose that is a truly remarkable achievement all on it's own.
McAz wrote:Yeah, roll on Bexit.
Guest wrote:Keyser wrote:52 pages and not one achievement yet.
But I suppose that is a truly remarkable achievement all on it's own.
Apart from you repeating yourself. Roll on Bexit
McAz wrote:Yeah, roll on Bexit.
Rolluplostinspace wrote:Unemployment in the UK is now so low it's in danger of exposing the lie used to create the numbers
LONDON — Unemployment in Britain is now just 4.5%. There are only 1.49 million unemployed people in the UK, versus 32 million people with jobs.
This is almost unheard of. Unemployment was most recently this low in December 1973, when the UK set an unrepeated record of just 3.4%.
The problem with this record is that the statistical definition of "unemployment" relies on a fiction that economists tell themselves about the nature of work. As the rate gets lower and lower, it tests that lie. Because — as anyone who has studied basic economics knows — the official definition of unemployment disguises the true rate. In reality, about 21.5% of all working-age people (defined as ages 16 to 64) are without jobs, or 8.83 million people, according to the Office for National Statistics.
That's more than four times the official number.
Here is how it works ........ http://uk.businessinsider.com/unemploym ... ers-2017-7
LordRaven wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:Unemployment in the UK is now so low it's in danger of exposing the lie used to create the numbers
LONDON — Unemployment in Britain is now just 4.5%. There are only 1.49 million unemployed people in the UK, versus 32 million people with jobs.
This is almost unheard of. Unemployment was most recently this low in December 1973, when the UK set an unrepeated record of just 3.4%.
The problem with this record is that the statistical definition of "unemployment" relies on a fiction that economists tell themselves about the nature of work. As the rate gets lower and lower, it tests that lie. Because — as anyone who has studied basic economics knows — the official definition of unemployment disguises the true rate. In reality, about 21.5% of all working-age people (defined as ages 16 to 64) are without jobs, or 8.83 million people, according to the Office for National Statistics.
That's more than four times the official number.
Here is how it works ........ http://uk.businessinsider.com/unemploym ... ers-2017-7
Interesting, many thanks. I can only envisage matters getting worse.
Guest wrote:
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests