peacetoff wrote:HOME Secretary Theresa May risked angering the Lib Dems by calling for the hated Human Rights Act to be axed last night.
Mrs May said she would "personally" like to see it go because of the problems it has caused.
Her comments will endear her to many infuriated by foreign terrorists, killers and rapists who use the law to avoid deportation.
But senior Lib Dems, including Deputy PM Nick Clegg, have pledged the Act will stay.
Uncomfortable ... Chris Huhne
Speaking on the eve of the Conservative Party conference in Manchester, Ms May said: "I'd personally like to see the Human Rights Act go because I think we have had some problems with it."
"I see it, here in the Home Office, particularly, the sort of problems we have in being unable to deport people who perhaps are terrorist suspects.
"Obviously we've seen it with some foreign criminals who are in the UK."
The Lib Dems have long supported Europe-inspired human rights legislation.
Mr Clegg promised delegates at his party's conference last month that the Human Rights Act, which enshrines the European Convention on Human Rights in UK law, was "here to stay".
Lib Dem Energy Secretary Chris Huhne even boasted his party will destroy the Government if it tries to scrap the laws.
He said: "If Conservative backbenchers persist in wanting to tear up the European Convention on Human Rights, then I can foresee a time when this party would be extremely uncomfortable in coalition."
Shami Chakrabarti, director of human rights organisation Liberty, said: "Modern Conservatives should think again about human rights values that were truly Churchill's legacy.
"Only a pretty 'nasty party' would promote human rights in the Middle East whilst scrapping them at home."
Frank Black wrote:its like all federal dogma
it never has any common sense clauses inbuilt....
Frank Black wrote:its like all federal dogma
it never has any common sense clauses inbuilt....
Guest wrote:Frank Black wrote:its like all federal dogma
it never has any common sense clauses inbuilt....
well the tories signed it
you never sign for anything you don't want do you?
RWPandJOEKING wrote:Frank Black wrote:its like all federal dogma
it never has any common sense clauses inbuilt....
Ofcourse not, they are not going to let a little thing like common sense get in the way of making money.
Frank Black wrote:Guest wrote:Frank Black wrote:its like all federal dogma
it never has any common sense clauses inbuilt....
well the tories signed it
you never sign for anything you don't want do you?
did u just call me a tory u cheeky cunt
RWPandJOEKING wrote:Frank Black wrote:its like all federal dogma
it never has any common sense clauses inbuilt....
Ofcourse not, they are not going to let a little thing like common sense get in the way of making money.
Guest wrote:Frank Black wrote:Guest wrote:Frank Black wrote:its like all federal dogma
it never has any common sense clauses inbuilt....
well the tories signed it
you never sign for anything you don't want do you?
did u just call me a tory u cheeky cunt
that would be too cruel to call someone a tory who isn't
I was just saying if you had a compiled a product signed for it then after 19 years you say you don't want it now
it smacks of absolute incompetence by those who formulated it
Guest wrote:RWPandJOEKING wrote:Frank Black wrote:its like all federal dogma
it never has any common sense clauses inbuilt....
Ofcourse not, they are not going to let a little thing like common sense get in the way of making money.
Many MP's and their family members are in the legal profession...
RWPandJOEKING wrote:Guest wrote:RWPandJOEKING wrote:Frank Black wrote:its like all federal dogma
it never has any common sense clauses inbuilt....
Ofcourse not, they are not going to let a little thing like common sense get in the way of making money.
Many MP's and their family members are in the legal profession...
Thats my whole point!
They run everything.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests