CELEBRITY CLIMATE CHANGE

Re: CELEBRITY CLIMATE CHANGE

Postby art1hur1moh » Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:12 pm

Frank Black wrote:hahaha
well if al bundy and brenda lee johnston say its true.. it must be

Fat Woman: "hey you i need new shoes"
Al Bundy: "certainly madam the blacksmiths is next door"
:mrgreen:



Size 7...
User avatar
art1hur1moh
 

Re: CELEBRITY CLIMATE CHANGE

Postby Dr_E » Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:44 pm

art1hur1moh wrote:Size 7...


Your parody of Art0hur0moh is WELL RABBASH!

This is how you do it:

[Cretin ON] Evolyewshun is FLASE and the Erf is FALT becos fotons hav no mas. PROOV 1+1=2. PROOV IT. [Cretin OFF]
User avatar
Dr_E
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:03 am

Re: CELEBRITY CLIMATE CHANGE

Postby spicy » Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:08 pm

I wonder how many of them actually do their own re-cycling? I bet they pay someone else to do their 'dirty work' work for them. How many of them own more than 1 car? How many of them use public transport? How many of them don't travel by plane very much?

In essence how many of them actually practice what they preach? :roll:
User avatar
spicy
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: CELEBRITY CLIMATE CHANGE

Postby art1hur1moh » Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:30 am

Dr_E wrote:
art1hur1moh wrote:Size 7...


Your parody of Art0hur0moh is WELL RABBASH!

This is how you do it:

[Cretin ON] Evolyewshun is FLASE and the Erf is FALT becos fotons hav no mas. PROOV 1+1=2. PROOV IT. [Cretin OFF]


Ok, I will take a nibble...

First question: what is the primary green house gas in the atmosphere?

Second question: Where dose all the carbon dioxide come from when combustion produces carbon monoxide?

The recent experiments published from CERN where unable to validate where mass comes from! It was a failed experiment! Though... in accordance with true scientific principles a failed experiment is still a posative result!

Dose one equal 1? Show proof! Other wise it is a hypothisis!

There is no intrinzic evidence to support evolutionary theory! C14 has a life span of 14,000 years there abouts... Stones are just pictures of organisims that where alive. Time for an annalogy ; ) the painting of the charge of the scots greys at the battle of Waterloo. If all we have is a picture and no direct records of the event, ie... stock reports, man power, ect... then it would be imposable for any one to say with certainty that the battle actualy happend, other than whitness accounts passed on through oral tradition. Bassed on the painting alone we wouldn't know who was fighting who, and for what reason/s! Once again we are left with trusting the word of one persons family history to validate the event.

Well over 500 student arciologist have writen a theisis on giants! Which there seems to be pleanty of fosils to show they lived, as well as oral records from many tribes accross the world! Species that where once thought extinct have mearly had spicific genes switched on, or they where simply missed or ignored if they don't conform to standard modles.
User avatar
art1hur1moh
 

Re: CELEBRITY CLIMATE CHANGE

Postby Dr_E » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:18 pm

Well, well, well...............maybe you are Art0hur0HOMO after all................you certainly appear to be asking the same retarded questions you have been getting the answers to for years. Here they are again, for the hard of learning:

1. The primary GHG is water vapour.........but it only has a residence time of days.........compared to CO2 which has an atmospheric lifetime of up to 100 years.
2. Your question is nonsense.........ideal stoichiometric combustion of carbon results in the production of CO2 and H20 (and energy), but as combustion reaches an equilibrium other minor by-products will be produced, such as CO.
3. The mechanism that gives rise to mass is a hot topic in physics.
4. The natural numbers consists of a set N together with a successor function f(), such that:
• There exists a unique member of N called ‘1,’ such that f is a bijection from N-{1} to N;
• If a set X contains 1, and whenever it contains a member, n, of N, it also contains f(n), then X= N.
We then define ‘+’ by: a+1= f(a)...........if b is not 1 then b= f(c) for some c and a+b is defined as f(a+c).........since ‘2’ is defined as f(1) it follows that 2= f(1)= 1+ 1.
5. Evidence for evolution:
a) Fossil record - we have transitional fossils that clearly show speciation in many organisms.
b) Geology - fossils of simple organisms and ancestral species are found in old layers of rock and more complex (evolved) species in newer layers of rock.
c) Anatomical record - we see homologies in our ancestral species, e.g., the forelimbs of many vertebrates contain the same bones.
d) Vestigial structures - many organisms have vestigial structures that no longer serve a function, e.g., boa constrictors have hip bones.
e) Molecular record - comparison of DNA from different species provides extremely strong evidence for evolution - closely related species share more similar dna and distantly related species share less.
f) Artificial selection - we have produced evolutionary change in organisms in laboratories, in agriculture and in our domestic animals. We can see evolution in action.
g) Convergent and divergent evolution - natural selection has produced similar forms under completely different circumstances.
h) Embryology - embryos exhibit characteristics of the embryos of their ancestors, e.g., human embryos have gill slits, tails, etc.
6. The Earth is not hollow and filled with dinosaurs that time forgot.
User avatar
Dr_E
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:03 am

Re: CELEBRITY CLIMATE CHANGE

Postby KeithTas » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:33 pm

art1hur1moh wrote:
Dr_E wrote:
art1hur1moh wrote:Size 7...


Your parody of Art0hur0moh is WELL RABBASH!

This is how you do it:

[Cretin ON] Evolyewshun is FLASE and the Erf is FALT becos fotons hav no mas. PROOV 1+1=2. PROOV IT. [Cretin OFF]


Ok, I will take a nibble...

First question: what is the primary green house gas in the atmosphere?

Second question: Where dose all the carbon dioxide come from when combustion produces carbon monoxide?

The recent experiments published from CERN where unable to validate where mass comes from! It was a failed experiment! Though... in accordance with true scientific principles a failed experiment is still a posative result!

Dose one equal 1? Show proof! Other wise it is a hypothisis!

There is no intrinzic evidence to support evolutionary theory! C14 has a life span of 14,000 years there abouts... Stones are just pictures of organisims that where alive. Time for an annalogy ; ) the painting of the charge of the scots greys at the battle of Waterloo. If all we have is a picture and no direct records of the event, ie... stock reports, man power, ect... then it would be imposable for any one to say with certainty that the battle actualy happend, other than whitness accounts passed on through oral tradition. Bassed on the painting alone we wouldn't know who was fighting who, and for what reason/s! Once again we are left with trusting the word of one persons family history to validate the event.

Well over 500 student arciologist have writen a theisis on giants! Which there seems to be pleanty of fosils to show they lived, as well as oral records from many tribes accross the world! Species that where once thought extinct have mearly had spicific genes switched on, or they where simply missed or ignored if they don't conform to standard modles.

You could be right E, this one could be one of the holy trinity of whacko's. Fossil records of giants, I know there have been many hoaxes but does the Natural history Museum have any real ones. Thought not. As for battles you idiot, the forces keep very good records going back centuries, right down to how many bullets each man was issued in some cases.
User avatar
KeithTas
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:10 pm

Re: CELEBRITY CLIMATE CHANGE

Postby Dr_E » Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:15 pm

KeithTas wrote:You could be right E, this one could be one of the holy trinity of whacko's. Fossil records of giants, I know there have been many hoaxes but does the Natural history Museum have any real ones. Thought not. As for battles you idiot, the forces keep very good records going back centuries, right down to how many bullets each man was issued in some cases.


Yes, but you are forgetting the oral records from tribes..............compelling stuff..............especially when vomited from the gaping maw of a barely sentient, drug-addled chimpanzee such as Crack-Art.

:off head:
User avatar
Dr_E
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:03 am

Previous

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests