Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Re: Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Postby Cactus Jack » Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:44 am

perro wrote:You're so sad, CJ.

You lie, and then expect people to take your word for something you refuse to document. Pat yourself on the back if it makes you feel good but you've made a fool of yourself. You are a waste of time. Perhaps others more intelligent than you will pick this thread up later.
If that's what you choose to think to console yourself perro then do go on.

For anyone who has their own google and can be bothered to sit through the hours of bile and bullshit to get to Condell's whiny self-pitying self justification the facts are there
User avatar
Cactus Jack
 
Posts: 21800
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Round yer somewhere

Re: Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Postby spicy » Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:50 am

Where's my reply to this gone?
User avatar
spicy
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Postby minjeeta » Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:14 am

perro wrote:You're so sad, CJ.

You lie, and then expect people to take your word for something you refuse to document. Pat yourself on the back if it makes you feel good but you've made a fool of yourself. You are a waste of time. Perhaps others more intelligent than you will pick this thread up later.

Well, that certainly leaves the field wide open!! :off head:
User avatar
minjeeta
 
Posts: 494
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Postby Cactus Jack » Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:25 am

minjeeta wrote:
perro wrote:You're so sad, CJ.

You lie, and then expect people to take your word for something you refuse to document. Pat yourself on the back if it makes you feel good but you've made a fool of yourself. You are a waste of time. Perhaps others more intelligent than you will pick this thread up later.

Well, that certainly leaves the field wide open!! :off head:
Well you won't be able to take up the cudgel will you Davey.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
 
Posts: 21800
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Round yer somewhere

Re: Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:34 pm

perro wrote:But no links. Just take your word for it? Because you are such an unbiased source of info?


Condell has said it himself.

You wont take Condell's word for it? You quote him on other shit but ignore the stuff he says about the church abusing kids.

did you read the Is Satan Catholic rant at all? All is explained in there.

Jesus wept
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Postby Cactus Jack » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:40 pm

Guest I'll be honest I can't remember which of his rants I heard it in and can't be bothered to check.

He was an abuse victim and his attitudes show the psychological scars it left - if feel sorry for the cunt but it doesn't make him any less of cunt
User avatar
Cactus Jack
 
Posts: 21800
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Round yer somewhere

Re: Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Postby Blunder » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:02 pm

Cannydc wrote:Never heard of him.

Does he have vested interests / take a thoroughly biased view, perhaps ?


I would have (perhaps) a bit more time for him if he were ever brave enough to debate any of his views,, but he doesn't, he just preaches unoriginal comments like the mullah's and the clergy he is critical of.

He has become what he hates in others,,, a boring preacher.
User avatar
Blunder
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:13 am

Re: Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Postby Stooo » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:10 pm

Pat Condell is a YouTube attentionwhore who cares nothing about his subject matter and everything about his page views :whogives:
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118838
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Pat Condell on the Palestinians

Postby Cactus Jack » Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:42 pm

Stoo with respect he's worse than that - there are plenty of youtube attentionwhores out there.

Pat Condell makes no bones about two facts.

1 - He was physically and sexually abused as a child.
2 - He has abused children - let's say verbally, emotionally and/or physically because I'm sure he would tell us if it were otherwise.

He blames his shortcomings on religion - which is convenient because it means he never has to take any responsibility for his own failings - and his usual tactic is to leap on any passing bandwagon to attack whichever religion happens to be closest - which currently is usually Islam but could just as easily be Catholicism, Judaism or belief in the Great Pumpkin - a quick shout out to Linus there - he wouldn't care either way.

Any violence he incites he sees as punishment not only for the religious but for himself - after all in his damaged psyche he 'let' the terrible events in his childhood happen to him. To eradicate his own failure to prevent the abuse he suffered he must remove all religion and religious influences - good or bad. On the probabilities we can guess that some people's lives will be ended due to his words - and in all likelihood his own life will end by his own hand
User avatar
Cactus Jack
 
Posts: 21800
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Round yer somewhere

Previous

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests

cron