DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Guest » Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:12 pm

LordRaven wrote:
Guest wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
Guest wrote:It is the continuation of policies from the 1980s and 90s to present, which is why we are in the shite. Maybe one day your one and only working braincell will have a read into British politics to understand how it works as you have absolutely no clue.

Here's one instance. Now the Tories are saying that PFI is a bad thing. When did PFI start? Who was in charge? No googling. Guess the year.

Continuation of policies, Raven read and learn. If you disagree please show a link/article supporting your argument. Ta

:trollface:


I see. Sidestep? I am a typical brain dead fool and I cant back up the bullshit,now there is a surprise :pmsl:

Sidestepping an deflection are the way of the politician--bunch of cunts!

You have all their qualities.

You cunt!! :Hiya:


Yes you are sidestepping the question. I know why. :bell:


Was there a question?
I was expecting an answer but I suppose that was far too much to expect and I have to go out soon :Hiya:
Sorry been on the cage talking to intelligent fun posters but thought I had better check on you before I do :pmsl:


Should of gone to specsavers.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Canoe man » Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:27 pm

Guest wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
Guest wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
I see. Sidestep? I am a typical brain dead fool and I cant back up the bullshit,now there is a surprise :pmsl:

Sidestepping an deflection are the way of the politician--bunch of cunts!

You have all their qualities.

You cunt!! :Hiya:


Yes you are sidestepping the question. I know why. :bell:


Was there a question?
I was expecting an answer but I suppose that was far too much to expect and I have to go out soon :Hiya:
Sorry been on the cage talking to intelligent fun posters but thought I had better check on you before I do :pmsl:


Should of gone to specsavers.


It seems nobody in here cares for the old folk :doomed:
User avatar
Canoe man
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Guest » Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:33 pm

Canoe man wrote:
Guest wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
Guest wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
I see. Sidestep? I am a typical brain dead fool and I cant back up the bullshit,now there is a surprise :pmsl:

Sidestepping an deflection are the way of the politician--bunch of cunts!

You have all their qualities.

You cunt!! :Hiya:


Yes you are sidestepping the question. I know why. :bell:


Was there a question?
I was expecting an answer but I suppose that was far too much to expect and I have to go out soon :Hiya:
Sorry been on the cage talking to intelligent fun posters but thought I had better check on you before I do :pmsl:


Should of gone to specsavers.


It seems nobody in here cares for the old folk :doomed:


Least of all the Tory blue rinse brigade
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Zebediahwozabullfrog » Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:49 pm

Guest wrote:
Canoe man wrote:
Guest wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
Guest wrote:
Yes you are sidestepping the question. I know why. :bell:


Was there a question?
I was expecting an answer but I suppose that was far too much to expect and I have to go out soon :Hiya:
Sorry been on the cage talking to intelligent fun posters but thought I had better check on you before I do :pmsl:


Should of gone to specsavers.


It seems nobody in here cares for the old folk :doomed:


Least of all the Tory blue rinse brigade


When itz freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezing the ol folk will freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze and die in thousands with tory vampires hopin all of em will be dyin intestate and then state gets loadsodosh.Probate dosh and inheritance tax will be a big help for the uncaring cunts coffers an think of all the nursing home swindles as herds of oaps get carted off to a warm cosy rest home to get beaten up by tory nursing staff rather than pay the leccy.And all the stamp duty an capital gains tax from all them empty run down bunglaows will help fill the evil cunts war chest.An they will sellem to thier mates an I bet the cunts have a pre christmas church servis an pray for a real stinkler winter with plenty of snow an ice and freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezin tempraturs.And waht tory blue rinse brigade are you ona bout al there oldies livin mansions.Cunts
User avatar
Zebediahwozabullfrog
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Guest » Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:00 pm

Zebediahwozabullfrog wrote:
Guest wrote:
Canoe man wrote:
Guest wrote:
LordRaven wrote:Was there a question?
I was expecting an answer but I suppose that was far too much to expect and I have to go out soon :Hiya:
Sorry been on the cage talking to intelligent fun posters but thought I had better check on you before I do :pmsl:


Should of gone to specsavers.


It seems nobody in here cares for the old folk :doomed:


Least of all the Tory blue rinse brigade


When itz freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezing the ol folk will freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze and die in thousands with tory vampires hopin all of em will be dyin intestate and then state gets loadsodosh.Probate dosh and inheritance tax will be a big help for the uncaring cunts coffers an think of all the nursing home swindles as herds of oaps get carted off to a warm cosy rest home to get beaten up by tory nursing staff rather than pay the leccy.And all the stamp duty an capital gains tax from all them empty run down bunglaows will help fill the evil cunts war chest.An they will sellem to thier mates an I bet the cunts have a pre christmas church servis an pray for a real stinkler winter with plenty of snow an ice and freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezin tempraturs.And waht tory blue rinse brigade are you ona bout al there oldies livin mansions.Cunts


yeah dem ones in da big owses wiv ver British Aerospace dividend cheks
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Cannydc » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:25 am

Hardest hit Councils: Losing 8.9% for two years

Source: Dept of Communities

Ashfield (Labour)

Great Yarmouth (NOC)

Barrow-in-Furness (Labour)

Hastings (Labour)

Bolsover (Labour)

Hyndburn (Labour)

Burnley (Labour)

Pendle (NOC)

Chesterfield (Labour)

Preston (Labour)

Copeland (Labour)

Thanet (NOC)


Seems a pretty clear pattern to me.

Biggest cuts in government funding are on councils which aren't Tory.

So non-Tory councils have to cut deepest.

Even a child could work that out...
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 21432
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Guest » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:49 am

Cannydc wrote:Hardest hit Councils: Losing 8.9% for two years

Source: Dept of Communities

Ashfield (Labour)

Great Yarmouth (NOC)

Barrow-in-Furness (Labour)

Hastings (Labour)

Bolsover (Labour)

Hyndburn (Labour)

Burnley (Labour)

Pendle (NOC)

Chesterfield (Labour)

Preston (Labour)

Copeland (Labour)

Thanet (NOC)


Seems a pretty clear pattern to me.

Biggest cuts in government funding are on councils which aren't Tory.

So non-Tory councils have to cut deepest.

Even a child could work that out...


Sadly children are far brighter than some of the mugs on here :gigglesnshit:
Reading through the recent threads I of the members would struggle to understand the stuff a 6 year old is taught.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby LordRaven » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:10 am

Cannydc wrote:Hardest hit Councils: Losing 8.9% for two years

Source: Dept of Communities

Ashfield (Labour)

Great Yarmouth (NOC)

Barrow-in-Furness (Labour)

Hastings (Labour)

Bolsover (Labour)

Hyndburn (Labour)

Burnley (Labour)

Pendle (NOC)

Chesterfield (Labour)

Preston (Labour)

Copeland (Labour)

Thanet (NOC)


Seems a pretty clear pattern to me.

Biggest cuts in government funding are on councils which aren't Tory.

So non-Tory councils have to cut deepest.

Even a child could work that out...


You love a bit of sensationalistic journalism Canny :gigglesnshit:

Quick question though--did labour do the same when in power?

It seems to me that there is a lot of tit for tat in all aspects of politics.

I just wish they would concentrate all efforts on getting us out of the shite.
User avatar
LordRaven
Twat.
 
Posts: 51797
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Enceladus

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Guest » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:34 am

LordRaven wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Hardest hit Councils: Losing 8.9% for two years

Source: Dept of Communities

Ashfield (Labour)

Great Yarmouth (NOC)

Barrow-in-Furness (Labour)

Hastings (Labour)

Bolsover (Labour)

Hyndburn (Labour)

Burnley (Labour)

Pendle (NOC)

Chesterfield (Labour)

Preston (Labour)

Copeland (Labour)

Thanet (NOC)


Seems a pretty clear pattern to me.

Biggest cuts in government funding are on councils which aren't Tory.

So non-Tory councils have to cut deepest.

Even a child could work that out...


You love a bit of sensationalistic journalism Canny :gigglesnshit:

Quick question though--did labour do the same when in power?

It seems to me that there is a lot of tit for tat in all aspects of politics.

I just wish they would concentrate all efforts on getting us out of the shite.


tit for tat has been a continuing policy since 1979

labour continued the policy in 97 and not the tories are doing the same

I read somewhere that one bloke hated the tories now because they continued labour policies but labour have been continuing tory policies :gigglesnshit:

people's lack of political knowledge does make me ROTFLMAO
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Bob Walpole » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:29 am

Guest wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Hardest hit Councils: Losing 8.9% for two years

Source: Dept of Communities

Ashfield (Labour)

Great Yarmouth (NOC)

Barrow-in-Furness (Labour)

Hastings (Labour)

Bolsover (Labour)

Hyndburn (Labour)

Burnley (Labour)

Pendle (NOC)

Chesterfield (Labour)

Preston (Labour)

Copeland (Labour)

Thanet (NOC)


Seems a pretty clear pattern to me.

Biggest cuts in government funding are on councils which aren't Tory.

So non-Tory councils have to cut deepest.

Even a child could work that out...


You love a bit of sensationalistic journalism Canny :gigglesnshit:

Quick question though--did labour do the same when in power?

It seems to me that there is a lot of tit for tat in all aspects of politics.

I just wish they would concentrate all efforts on getting us out of the shite.


tit for tat has been a continuing policy since 1979

labour continued the policy in 97 and not the tories are doing the same

I read somewhere that one bloke hated the tories now because they continued labour policies but labour have been continuing tory policies :gigglesnshit:

people's lack of political knowledge does make me ROTFLMAO


Yours especially,it has been going on since my day you know.
But being an instrument that pedals lies for a living you would not be unable to understand that.
User avatar
Bob Walpole
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby george galloway » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:36 am

Cannydc wrote:Hardest hit Councils: Losing 8.9% for two years

Source: Dept of Communities

Ashfield (Labour)

Great Yarmouth (NOC)

Barrow-in-Furness (Labour)

Hastings (Labour)

Bolsover (Labour)

Hyndburn (Labour)

Burnley (Labour)

Pendle (NOC)

Chesterfield (Labour)

Preston (Labour)

Copeland (Labour)

Thanet (NOC)


Seems a pretty clear pattern to me.

Biggest cuts in government funding are on councils which aren't Tory.

So non-Tory councils have to cut deepest.

Even a child could work that out...



Labour have no respect for anyone but themselves and both I and most fringe parties and even the bnp can vouch for their underhand tricks.
Electioneering fraud(worst offenders in uk),cutting funding to anyone who is not labour,buying votes and the list goes on.
User avatar
george galloway
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Shirley Porter » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:16 pm

Bob Walpole wrote:
Guest wrote:
LordRaven wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Hardest hit Councils: Losing 8.9% for two years

Source: Dept of Communities

Ashfield (Labour)

Great Yarmouth (NOC)

Barrow-in-Furness (Labour)

Hastings (Labour)

Bolsover (Labour)

Hyndburn (Labour)

Burnley (Labour)

Pendle (NOC)

Chesterfield (Labour)

Preston (Labour)

Copeland (Labour)

Thanet (NOC)


Seems a pretty clear pattern to me.

Biggest cuts in government funding are on councils which aren't Tory.

So non-Tory councils have to cut deepest.

Even a child could work that out...


You love a bit of sensationalistic journalism Canny :gigglesnshit:

Quick question though--did labour do the same when in power?

It seems to me that there is a lot of tit for tat in all aspects of politics.

I just wish they would concentrate all efforts on getting us out of the shite.


tit for tat has been a continuing policy since 1979

labour continued the policy in 97 and not the tories are doing the same

I read somewhere that one bloke hated the tories now because they continued labour policies but labour have been continuing tory policies :gigglesnshit:

people's lack of political knowledge does make me ROTFLMAO


Yours especially,it has been going on since my day you know.
But being an instrument that pedals lies for a living you would not be unable to understand that.


Yes when Labour where in charge there were the worst gerrymanders.
They lied to people like the District Auditor.
They were surcharged tens of millions but failed to cough up.
Yes I agree Labour are lying bastards.

We Tories tell the truth all the time and never ever lie.
User avatar
Shirley Porter
 

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby LordRaven » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:41 pm

They are all a bunch of liars--telling the truth is a vote loser :Hiya:
User avatar
LordRaven
Twat.
 
Posts: 51797
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Enceladus

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Big Fat Frosty » Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:37 am

its true there all guilty of lying by association
u cant tell me all this fox story
was a total suprise to those in government
i mean does mi5 just let mp's do what they want
without vetting it all for security leaks
they knew he was talking his boyfriend around wiv him
and so will the PM
only when the press get wind
do they all play coy...
User avatar
Big Fat Frosty
 
Posts: 17365
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: DOES ANYONE SUPPORT THIS ?

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:57 am

Frank Black wrote:its true there all guilty of lying by association
u cant tell me all this fox story
was a total suprise to those in government
i mean does mi5 just let mp's do what they want
without vetting it all for security leaks
they knew he was talking his boyfriend around wiv him
and so will the PM
only when the press get wind
do they all play coy...


Cameron's judgement has been shown up as well
User avatar
Guest
 

PreviousNext

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests