BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Cannydc » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:01 pm

Not a snowball's chance in hell.....

How many buy into the Labour Party ?

Union members by the million, for a start.

And how many actually buy into the Tory Party ?

A few hundred very rich, very greedy, very self centred people.

(And don't forgrt the few dozen 'hard core' loons who buy into BNP/NF)
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 21432
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Guest » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:37 pm

Guest wrote:
Let's hope they succeed wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Like they haven't tried.

Why on earth would big business and the banking sharks pour money into Tory coffers ?

The generosity of their hearts ?



Keep up the good work chaps and then use treasury money and the media to crush the commie bastard Liebour party :canny:

Liebour did so with bnp so it must be legal.

And if it isn't just change the law like Liebour did.

Democracy? Yeah right?


Labour are nowhere near Communist and to suggest so shows your lack of any intelligence. Labour carried on Conservative policies of the 1990s.


Ah yes I do recall that when Bliar realised Labour as commies were unelectable because of Foot he changed them to Liebour and lied through his teeth to get power,things can only get better and all the other lies that were used to amass his personal £30Mil fortune.
Thanks for reminding they sold their souls by prostituting themselves to anyone for reasons of personal greed and lust for power.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Guest » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:40 pm

Cannydc wrote:Not a snowball's chance in hell.....

How many buy into the Labour Party ?

Union members by the million, for a start.

And how many actually buy into the Tory Party ?

A few hundred very rich, very greedy, very self centred people.

(And don't forgrt the few dozen 'hard core' loons who buy into BNP/NF)


Short memory?

Who won most seats last general election? :dunno:

Blows your load of bollox out of the water.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Cactus Jack » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:25 pm

Guest wrote:Let's see weight of establishment

The Sun
The Times
The Sunday Times
The Daily Telegraph
The Sunday Telegraph
The Daily Express
The Sunday Express
The Daily Star
The Star on Sunday
The Daily Mail
The Mail on Sunday all have published untrue stories about Labour

Which have published untrue stories about the BNP?
In face every one of those papers has published an untrue story about Labour, the Lib-Dems and the Conservatives. None, to my knowledge, have published an untrue story about the BNP. Not even the Daily Mail :laughing:
User avatar
Cactus Jack
 
Posts: 21800
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Round yer somewhere

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Guest » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:27 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
Guest wrote:Let's see weight of establishment

The Sun
The Times
The Sunday Times
The Daily Telegraph
The Sunday Telegraph
The Daily Express
The Sunday Express
The Daily Star
The Star on Sunday
The Daily Mail
The Mail on Sunday all have published untrue stories about Labour

Which have published untrue stories about the BNP?
In face every one of those papers has published an untrue story about Labour, the Lib-Dems and the Conservatives. None, to my knowledge, have published an untrue story about the BNP. Not even the Daily Mail :laughing:


Pure speculation then? :dunno:

So what's to laugh about?

How can humour be derived from such simplicity? :pmsl:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Guest » Tue Nov 01, 2011 10:56 am

Guest wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Guest wrote:Let's see weight of establishment

The Sun
The Times
The Sunday Times
The Daily Telegraph
The Sunday Telegraph
The Daily Express
The Sunday Express
The Daily Star
The Star on Sunday
The Daily Mail
The Mail on Sunday all have published untrue stories about Labour

Which have published untrue stories about the BNP?
In face every one of those papers has published an untrue story about Labour, the Lib-Dems and the Conservatives. None, to my knowledge, have published an untrue story about the BNP. Not even the Daily Mail :laughing:


Pure speculation then? :dunno:

So what's to laugh about?

How can humour be derived from such simplicity? :pmsl:


Show us an untrue article by any paper about the BNP?

You can't. What a huge surprise
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Guest » Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:46 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Guest wrote:Let's see weight of establishment

The Sun
The Times
The Sunday Times
The Daily Telegraph
The Sunday Telegraph
The Daily Express
The Sunday Express
The Daily Star
The Star on Sunday
The Daily Mail
The Mail on Sunday all have published untrue stories about Labour

Which have published untrue stories about the BNP?
In face every one of those papers has published an untrue story about Labour, the Lib-Dems and the Conservatives. None, to my knowledge, have published an untrue story about the BNP. Not even the Daily Mail :laughing:


Pure speculation then? :dunno:

So what's to laugh about?

How can humour be derived from such simplicity? :pmsl:


Show us an untrue article by any paper about the BNP?

You can't. What a huge surprise


That is because on seeing any mention of bnp I skip the articles because I dont find any articles about them worth reading let alone wankworthy as per yourself :pmsl:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby spicy » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:48 pm

wutang wrote:
spicy wrote:
Absolute shyte. I'd be the first to point out that he thinks he's indispensible and should go.




Until he goes its game over. You can blame "teh establishment" and "teh lefties" all you want, in fact they would welcome your assertions that the decline in the BNP is down to them, but the facts dont lie...

Grifter has driven away most of the senior members, they all blame him solely for their leaving. Accountants, party organisers, elected councillors, elected Assembly members, fundraisers, election campaign managers, and countless more - the people a political party needs just to function ALL DRIVEN AWAY BY GRIFFIN!!. They hate his guts, constant leadership challenges by people who can see that Griffin is money grabbing trash. Even the only other MEP (brons) is now in the firing line for challenging Griffin (he says the Grifter rigged the leadership elections... DEMOCRACY :gigglesnshit:)

And then there is all the money lost through incompetence by Griffin and his cabal, shyteloads lost by stupid errors, no wonder people cant be bothered to pay membership... most of it goes to paying for grifters stupidity THE REST PAYS FOR HIS LIFESTYLE.

keep blaming the establishment though.... with supporters like the you the party is doomed :hap:


I agree with some of the things he says, I agree with some things Labour say, I agree with some things the Conservatives say, I agree with almost everything UKIP say. The problem with people like you is you are so fucking content with with status quo nothing is going to change politics will always remain the same because of it, subjects will remain taboo (immigration) as a result. People will be labelled racist because of it. I maintain if you freeze immigration into this country most of our current problems will be eased. Population growth for one. The thing with Griffin is he should have maybe chosen his words a little more carefully when he denied the halocaust. As a direct result of that he has never been taken seriously which is a little unfair because every politician has a right to change their minds for example Tony Blair used to be in CND.
User avatar
spicy
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby spicy » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:55 pm

Guest wrote:
Let's hope they succeed wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Like they haven't tried.

Why on earth would big business and the banking sharks pour money into Tory coffers ?

The generosity of their hearts ?



Keep up the good work chaps and then use treasury money and the media to crush the commie bastard Liebour party :canny:

Liebour did so with bnp so it must be legal.

And if it isn't just change the law like Liebour did.

Democracy? Yeah right?


Labour are nowhere near Communist and to suggest so shows your lack of any intelligence. Labour carried on Conservative policies of the 1990s.



HIstorically Labour have links with the Communist Party namely Dennis Healey (is he still alive I think so)? also John Reid Hugh Scanlon amongst others. :Hiya:
User avatar
spicy
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Guest » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:59 pm

spicy wrote:
Guest wrote:
Let's hope they succeed wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Like they haven't tried.

Why on earth would big business and the banking sharks pour money into Tory coffers ?

The generosity of their hearts ?



Keep up the good work chaps and then use treasury money and the media to crush the commie bastard Liebour party :canny:

Liebour did so with bnp so it must be legal.

And if it isn't just change the law like Liebour did.

Democracy? Yeah right?


Labour are nowhere near Communist and to suggest so shows your lack of any intelligence. Labour carried on Conservative policies of the 1990s.



HIstorically Labour have links with the Communist Party namely Dennis Healey (is he still alive I think so)? also John Reid Hugh Scanlon amongst others. :Hiya:


Yeah that was over 50 years ago. That's like saying the Tories have links with BNP/NF because one of their politicians was a member donkeys years ago. So three ancient politicians from yesteryear makes a party Communist. You cannot make up the level of ignorance of the Far Right as they straw clutch.

Anyway most people know that communism in its purist form - not Leninism/|Marxism or Stalinism is completely different, is far far better than fascism
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Guest » Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:03 pm

spicy wrote:
wutang wrote:
spicy wrote:
Absolute shyte. I'd be the first to point out that he thinks he's indispensible and should go.




Until he goes its game over. You can blame "teh establishment" and "teh lefties" all you want, in fact they would welcome your assertions that the decline in the BNP is down to them, but the facts dont lie...

Grifter has driven away most of the senior members, they all blame him solely for their leaving. Accountants, party organisers, elected councillors, elected Assembly members, fundraisers, election campaign managers, and countless more - the people a political party needs just to function ALL DRIVEN AWAY BY GRIFFIN!!. They hate his guts, constant leadership challenges by people who can see that Griffin is money grabbing trash. Even the only other MEP (brons) is now in the firing line for challenging Griffin (he says the Grifter rigged the leadership elections... DEMOCRACY :gigglesnshit:)

And then there is all the money lost through incompetence by Griffin and his cabal, shyteloads lost by stupid errors, no wonder people cant be bothered to pay membership... most of it goes to paying for grifters stupidity THE REST PAYS FOR HIS LIFESTYLE.

keep blaming the establishment though.... with supporters like the you the party is doomed :hap:


I agree with some of the things he says, I agree with some things Labour say, I agree with some things the Conservatives say, I agree with almost everything UKIP say. The problem with people like you is you are so fucking content with with status quo nothing is going to change politics will always remain the same because of it, subjects will remain taboo (immigration) as a result. People will be labelled racist because of it. I maintain if you freeze immigration into this country most of our current problems will be eased. Population growth for one. The thing with Griffin is he should have maybe chosen his words a little more carefully when he denied the halocaust. As a direct result of that he has never been taken seriously which is a little unfair because every politician has a right to change their minds for example Tony Blair used to be in CND.


He said it was a Holohoax. He denied the volume of death due to fascist forces, which is a bit different to being in a campaign.

What things do you agree with UKIP?

Do you agree with them when they said in 2000 that 999 calls would be banned? Have they been banned? :pmsl:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby spicy » Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:13 pm

Well I tried to phone the police on Saturday because there were teenagers in my kids school when they should not have been. In the past there has been fires whereby the school closed for a week windows smashed etc etc. I regard that as an emergency however I was informed to dial 101 first, how things have changed? it seems the powers that be could be idea grabbing.

On the holocaust numbers I'd heard that the numbers of Jews killed had been inflated because people with disabilities homosexuals etc were also killed.

I don't know for sure but that said do you???
User avatar
spicy
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby Guest » Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:23 pm

spicy wrote:Well I tried to phone the police on Saturday because there were teenagers in my kids school when they should not have been. In the past there has been fires whereby the school closed for a week windows smashed etc etc. I regard that as an emergency however I was informed to dial 101 first, how things have changed? it seems the powers that be could be idea grabbing.

On the holocaust numbers I'd heard that the numbers of Jews killed had been inflated because people with disabilities homosexuals etc were also killed.

I don't know for sure but that said do you???


There are two emergency numbers and have been for 30 odd years 999 and 112 and we aren't dropping the 999. The 112 was brought in as dialling 999 on an old telephone was 12 seconds longer than 112 be the time the connection was cleared.

Far Right revisionists are always trying to reduce the numbers like ignoring all the hundreds of thousands that died en route to the death camps. Most of the disabled/gays/gypsies etc were killed first before any Jews.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby spicy » Tue Nov 01, 2011 2:23 pm

Guest wrote:
spicy wrote:
Guest wrote:
Let's hope they succeed wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Like they haven't tried.

Why on earth would big business and the banking sharks pour money into Tory coffers ?

The generosity of their hearts ?



Keep up the good work chaps and then use treasury money and the media to crush the commie bastard Liebour party :canny:

Liebour did so with bnp so it must be legal.

And if it isn't just change the law like Liebour did.

Democracy? Yeah right?


Labour are nowhere near Communist and to suggest so shows your lack of any intelligence. Labour carried on Conservative policies of the 1990s.



HIstorically Labour have links with the Communist Party namely Dennis Healey (is he still alive I think so)? also John Reid Hugh Scanlon amongst others. :Hiya:


Yeah that was over 50 years ago. That's like saying the Tories have links with BNP/NF because one of their politicians was a member donkeys years ago. So three ancient politicians from yesteryear makes a party Communist. You cannot make up the level of ignorance of the Far Right as they straw clutch.

Anyway most people know that communism in its purist form - not Leninism/|Marxism or Stalinism is completely different, is far far better than fascism


I disagree there are many Communists in the Labour party under the Socialist guise. They feel it's the nearest they'll get to it so it will have to do!
User avatar
spicy
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: BNP/NF DOWN TO 70 HARD-CORE MEMBERS (GRIFFIN)

Postby spicy » Tue Nov 01, 2011 2:34 pm

Guest wrote:
spicy wrote:
Guest wrote:
Let's hope they succeed wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Like they haven't tried.

Why on earth would big business and the banking sharks pour money into Tory coffers ?

The generosity of their hearts ?



Keep up the good work chaps and then use treasury money and the media to crush the commie bastard Liebour party :canny:

Liebour did so with bnp so it must be legal.

And if it isn't just change the law like Liebour did.

Democracy? Yeah right?


Labour are nowhere near Communist and to suggest so shows your lack of any intelligence. Labour carried on Conservative policies of the 1990s.



HIstorically Labour have links with the Communist Party namely Dennis Healey (is he still alive I think so)? also John Reid Hugh Scanlon amongst others. :Hiya:


Yeah that was over 50 years ago. That's like saying the Tories have links with BNP/NF because one of their politicians was a member donkeys years ago. So three ancient politicians from yesteryear makes a party Communist. You cannot make up the level of ignorance of the Far Right as they straw clutch.

Anyway most people know that communism in its purist form - not Leninism/|Marxism or Stalinism is completely different, is far far better than fascism


No dear John Reid was in the last Labour government.

Jeremy Corbyn is dubvious too
User avatar
spicy
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:19 pm

PreviousNext

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests