Better still, tell Ed Miliband.
A very useful weapon for the next election ?
The government will make no savings by raising the public sector pension age to 67, a pensions consultant has said.
"The total cost of the more generous, but later pension, is virtually the same as the cost of the current, less generous but earlier pension," said leading consultant John Ralfe.
Mr Ralfe's study points to the accrual rates in the forthcoming schemes, which means the rate at which a pension builds up each year before retirement.
The important point is that the rate at which pensions are accrued - the rate at which benefits are earned - has been improved by the reforms”
As a result of recent negotiations with trade unions, the NHS career average scheme will have an annual accrual rate of 1/54th of each year's earnings, while the teachers' scheme will have an annual accrual rate of 1/57th of each year's earnings.
To prevent accrued pensions being eroded by inflation, each member's accrued pension will then be uprated each year.
The proposed revaluation rate, for active members, will be the consumer prices index (CPI) plus 1.5% for the NHS scheme, and CPI plus 1.6% each year in the teachers' scheme.
"The Teachers Pension Scheme (TPS) and NHS have annual increases over CPI baked in, which gives no flexibility to have a pension freeze along with a pay freeze," said Mr Ralfe in the report.
"Pensions will still go up, even if pay is frozen."
Mr Ralfe's study concludes that the cost to the taxpayer before the reforms of having the retirement age at 60 was 31% of the average public sector salary.
After the reforms, Mr Ralfe claims, the cost to the taxpayer of having the retirement age at 67 will be broadly the same: 31% of a teacher's salary, 32% of an NHS worker's salary and 26% of a civil servant's salary.