Maddog wrote:Guest wrote:Maddog wrote:Big Fat Frosty wrote:Maddog wrote:
Since when are dictators removed from office by an election or term limits?
You talk some crazy shit sometimes.
yea your cia's involvment in iran was about humanity
go fuck yourself
you installed your own dictator there and fucked the people over
like you did in numerous other oil producing nations
altruism my arsehole
the cia funds itself by selling drugs
and is as evil as the taliban and has way more blood on its hands
spose your gonna deny the facts in that video next
or the iran contra scandle or the involvement with noriaga
you just talk shit all the time
The CIA works for our interests. They are not the Peace Corps.
Importing heroin through Beirut during the late 1980s was in your interests?
Possibly. Perhaps you could use your verifiable (no speculation or conjecture) evidence, to explain why they were importing heroin.
Leslie Cockburn states CIA policy from 66-74 was to flood the USA with cheap narcotics be it cocaine, hash or heroin. The route was mainly Turkey/ Greece/Marseilles/USA. It was only outrage in France in 1973 with the leaking of various memos from the SDECE and a huge staged managed heroin bust, which exposed the SDECE role in this route set up by the CIA. The French front companies set up were fronted with CIA cash. The front company involved with the massive NYPD corruption was paid by the CIA. $70 Million worth of heroin was stolen from NYPD and replaced with flour. Fortunately the Watergate Affair was happening at the same time as the French court cases and was only reported by the British/Italian media outside of France.
Even after the mandate was given for the CIA and DEA to share information that wasn't the case at all. This was also the case in the CIA/Contras drug trafficking. The DEA were only given some 'information'. This was highlighted in the DEA's Response to Information About Contra Drug Trafficking report.
Because the activities of the CIA were not the focus of our review, we did not conduct a thorough assessment of the extent to which the CIA passed all narcotics-related information involving Contras or Contra supporters to the DEA. However, in our limited review of certain CIA files, we found intelligence information regarding drug trafficking by Contra supporters that does not appear to have been passed to the DEA. We are also aware that the CIA did pass some intelligence information about drug traffickers affiliated with the Contra movement to the DEA and other entities. We leave it to the CIA OIG to describe in its report all the information it had regarding Contras and drug trafficking and whether the CIA reported that information to the DEA or any other appropriate authorities.
According to an internal CIA memorandum, CIA Central American Task Force Chief Alan Fiers told Congressional intelligence committees in July 1987 that the CIA would be meeting with the DEA to discuss information regarding possible trafficking by members of the Nicaraguan resistance. Despite this assertion, neither the DEA nor the CIA OIG could locate any record of any such discussions. Alan Fiers refused to be interviewed by the OIG. In response to our letter to him, he called us and said in a short conversation that he recalled only one instance when the CIA passed Contra and narcotics-related information to the DEA, regarding Cuban national Jorge Morales, which is discussed in the next section. He refused to be interviewed by us any further.
http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/9712/ch11p1.htmLeslie Cockburn, Out of Control (Atlantic Monthly, 1987). It is an excellent read.
