Clinton Ca$H...

[ATXn;D]

FBI Probe Into Russian Uranium Bribes Concealed By Obama DOJ; Mueller, McCabe, Rosenstein Involved

Meanwhile, Obama appointed "travel ban" Judge from Hawaii presided over laughable plea bargains once the Uranium One deal closed...

Google.com/2018-01- ... rosenstein

Slowly, slowly it will all come out.

Told ya

[Stooo]

Meanwhile, in the real world:

Stephen Bannon, President Donald Trump’s former chief strategist, will now have to divulge what he knows about possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The New York Times reports that special counsel Robert Mueller has formally subpoenaed Bannon to testify in front of a grand jury. It’s the first time we know Mueller has used a grand jury subpoena to get a top member of Trump’s inner circle to talk.

Bannon joined the Trump campaign as its chairman in August 2016 and then served as the Trump White House’s top strategist for one year. He would be in a good position to know if the Trump campaign purposefully worked with Russia to sway the 2016 presidential election. However, it’s unclear just how much he might know about other major issues Mueller is surely looking into, including Trump’s firing of former FBI Director James Comey.

A source told the New York Times that it’s possible Mueller’s subpoena is a strategic move designed to convince Bannon to speak with Mueller’s team privately instead of testifying in front of a grand jury.

Regardless, Bannon is an important figure in Trump’s drive to the White House — and he may have interesting things to tell Mueller.

https://www.vox.com/2018/1/16/16897200/ ... ia-mueller

By the balls ladies and gentlemen, by the balls...

[Stooo]

Why did Mueller subpoena Bannon to testify before the grand jury? How is that different from an informal interview with investigators? (Short answer: He likely wants to question Bannon without Bannon's attorney present.)

1/ As @nytimes reported above, Mueller subpoenaed Steve Bannon to testify before the grand jury. He's the first person in Trump's person in Trump's inner circle to be subpoenaed. Other White House staff agreed to be informally interviewed.

2/ Typically witnesses in an investigation like this one are interviewed informally, especially if they have their own attorney, as Bannon does. So this is a very unusual move. It could mean a couple of things.

3/ First, federal prosecutors often will send over a grand jury subpoena as a first step to then negotiate the informal interview. Ultimately the subpoena is the leverage they have to get a subject to comply with an interview.

4/ I doubt that's what happened here because Bannon is represented by a skilled attorney who also represents Priebus and McGahn, who were already interviewed by Mueller. That means Mueller's team is already in touch with his attorney and has a relationship with him.

5/ If they called Bannon's attorney, he'd no doubt agree to an interview, because the alternative is a grand jury subpoena. Why is testifying before the grand jury worse for someone being interviewed? Because their attorney can't be present in the room with them.

6/ No one is allowed in the grand jury room other than the witness, the prosecutors, the grand jurors, and the court reporter. Also, the fact that there is a court reporter makes it easier for the prosecutor to charge the witness with making a false statement.

7/ Typically, prosecutors also prefer the freewheeling informal interview, because they can ask a broader array of questions in a less tense setting, with a FBI agent present. Often defense lawyers can help their clients remember details by directing them to key documents.

8/ False statements in an informal interview can be prosecuted, as Papadopoulos and Flynn discovered. Typically the desire to prosecute false statements doesn't drive a decision to issue a grand jury subpoena.

9/ The most likely reason that Mueller prefers to have Bannon testify before the grand jury is because his attorney won't be present and it will be easier to catch Bannon off-guard and receive truthful answers. Testifying before a grand jury is intimidating.

10/ When I was a federal prosecutor, I didn't like when multiple witnesses in the same case had the same attorney, even though it was usually permissible. I was worried that the attorney would use their increased knowledge of the case to help the witnesses tailor their testimony.

11/ Mueller may be concerned that Bannon won't be as candid with his attorney present as he would be with no attorney in front of the grand jury. Grand jury questioning, with a court reporter, also lends itself to a harsher questioning style akin to cross-examination.

https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti

But,but uranium one, pizzagate, BUTTERY MALES!

[Fletch]

Didn't I ask if Bannon was a plant a while ago?

Ex navy intel. Lots about Navy involvement in corruption using coastguard.

Careful what you wish for Stooo

[Stooo]

Didn't I ask if Bannon was a plant a while ago?

Ex navy intel. Lots about Navy involvement in corruption using coastguard.

Careful what you wish for Stooo

This is a plant:



That pointy, doughy thing on the front of your face is your nose.

Welcome to the redpill.

[Fletch]

Didn't I ask if Bannon was a plant a while ago?

Ex navy intel. Lots about Navy involvement in corruption using coastguard.

Careful what you wish for Stooo

This is a plant:



That pointy, doughy thing on the front of your face is your nose.

Welcome to the redpill.

Admittedly the image of a plant I used at the time was insignificant compared to that, but plant it was.

Did you miss Mark Lambert indictment? He ran the uranium 1 logistics side with a chap called Kroupnik who was involved on the mining side.

[Stooo]

Didn't I ask if Bannon was a plant a while ago?

Ex navy intel. Lots about Navy involvement in corruption using coastguard.

Careful what you wish for Stooo

This is a plant:



That pointy, doughy thing on the front of your face is your nose.

Welcome to the redpill.

Admittedly the image of a plant I used at the time was insignificant compared to that, but plant it was.

Did you miss Mark Lambert indictment? He ran the uranium 1 logistics side with a chap called Kroupnik who was involved on the mining side.

The wheels are coming off mate, it's as clear as...

Oh wait.

[Fletch]

House Report Concluded Pakistanis Made ‘Unauthorized Access’ To Congressional Servers

House investigators concluded that Democratic IT aides made unauthorized access to congressional servers in 2016, allegedly accessing the data of members for whom they did not work, logging in as members of Congress themselves, and covering their tracks, according to a presentation summarizing the findings of a four-month internal probe.

Their behavior mirrored a “classic method for insiders to exfiltrate data from an organization,” and they continued even after orders to stop, the briefing materials allege. There are indications that numerous members’ data may have been secretly residing not on their designated servers, but instead aggregated onto one server, according to the briefing and other sources. Authorities said that the entire server was then physically stolen.

When acting on the findings, Democratic leadership appear to have misrepresented the issue to their own members as solely a matter of theft, a comparison of the investigators’ findings with Democrats’ recollections and a committee’s public statement shows, leading 44 Democrats to not conduct protective measures typically taken after a breach — including informing constituents whose personal information may have been exposed. (A list of the involved members is below.)
-
-
-
It found indications that a House “server is being used for nefarious purposes and elevated the risk that individuals could be reading and/or removing information” and “could be used to store documents taken from other offices.” The server was that of the House Democratic Caucus, a sister group of the DNC that was run at the time by then-Rep. Xavier Becerra.

The aides named are Imran Awan, his wife Hina Alvi, his brothers Abid and Jamal, and his friend Rao Abbas, Pakistani-born aides whose lives are filled with reason for concern. Abid’s Ukranian wife Natalia Sova and Haseeb Rana were also involved in the Awans’ activities but departed the House payroll prior to the investigation.

One systems administrator “logged into a member’s office two months after he was terminated from that office,” the investigative summary says.

While the rules could have been violated for some innocuous purpose, the presentation indicates that is unlikely: “This pattern of login activity suggests steps are being taken to conceal their activity.”

A second presentation shows that shortly before the election, their alleged behavior got even worse. “During September 2016, shared employee continued to use Democratic Caucus computers in anomalous ways:

Logged onto laptop as system administrator
Changed identity and logged onto Democratic Caucus server using 17 other user account credentials
Some credentials belonged to Members
The shared employee did not work for 9 of the 17 offices to which these user accounts belonged.”

The investigation found “possible storage of sensitive House information outside the House … Dropbox is installed on two Caucus computers used by the shared employees. Two user accounts had thousands of files in their Dropbox folder on each computer.” Using Dropbox is against House rules because it uploads files offsite.

-
-
The statements of numerous Democrats indicate that the Democratic staff of the House Administration Committee and other House officials may have withheld information about cybersecurity breaches from members who employed the suspects, and appear to have misled them about the basic nature of the investigation.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/16/house ... l-servers/

IG report finally starts to be revealed. Makes pretty damning reading for the Dems and goes on to question the narrative put out by the Washington Post. The facts are at odds with what they claim.

This is just the beginning, the report is long but it's not likely to get any better for the Dems and some Repubs.

[Fletch]

Former CIA Officer Warns: Deep State Is "Terrified" Of Trump, "Want Him Taken Out"

"Trump's making tremendous progress despite tremendous resistance. They have already done a character assassination on him, and I think they could go further than that... Trump is making progress, and he has them running scared."

Former “high-level” CIA officer Kevin Shipp says President Trump has “declared war” on the so-called Deep State and the shadow government.



Shipp explains, “I differentiate between the ‘Deep State’ and the shadow government.

Google.com/2018-01- ... -taken-out

https://usawatchdog.com/trump-has-decla ... more-19995

There's a presentation by Kevin Shipp explaining the corruption and how it works.

phpBB [video]

CIA Agent Whistleblower Risks All To Expose The Shadow Government

Well worth a watch, about an hour long.

[Fletch]

Fusion GPS Retracts Major Claim About Anti-Trump Dossier

Fusion GPS retracted a significant claim that they made during a closed-door testimony — further damaging the credibility of the anti-Trump dossier that the opposition research firm compiled.

Glenn Simpson, co-founder of Fusion GPS, claimed in August 2017 and in January of this year that the FBI had a source inside the Trump presidential campaign that was feeding them information which gave credibility to the anti-Trump dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee, The Washington Times reported.

Those statements are false, or, as Fusion GPS puts it, were “mischaracterized” by Simpson.

The source that tipped off the FBI was apparently an Australian diplomat who was told by George Papadopoulos over drinks that a professor linked to the Russians knew that the Russian government had thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails.

However, after Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) released the transcripts of Simpson’s secret testimony, a source close to Fusion GPS stated that Simpson’s statements were inaccurate.

NBC reporter Ken Dilanian tweeted: “A source close to Fusion GPS tells me there was no walk-in source — that was a mischaracterization by Simpson of the Australian diplomat tip about Papadopoulis.”

https://truepundit.com/report-fusion-gp ... p-dossier/

Oh dear, still trying to get their stories straight, good Job Feinstein leaked it to help them, eh...

[Fletch]

Steve Bannon: Former Trump aide strikes deal to avoid grand jury appearance in Russia probe

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 64211.html

Why might that be then?

Can't risk any deep state connections being revealed to the public maybe...

[Fletch]

phpBB [video]

Haitian President EXPOSES - Clinton Foundation - 'Corrupt Hillary'' Bribe Me!!

[ATXn;D]

http://video.foxnews.com/v/571262428400 ... show-clips

[ATXn;D]

FBI Agent Shared Russia Probe Information With Christopher Steele

http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/17/repor ... er-steele/

[ATXn;D]

Trump dossier probes now include possible State Department involvement

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron ... le/2646017