phpBB [video]
ATXn;D wrote:The highly anticipated Clinton Cash documentary will air for free on Breitbart on Saturday, July 23 at 8:00 p.m. ET and on Sunday, July 24 at 2:00 and 8:00 p.m. ET.
***Due to the overwhelming demand to view this film, we’ve decided to broadcast it online for free with no password required***
VIDEO: “CLINTON CASH’ IS SCREENED IN CANNES
The weekend Clinton Cash global release, just days before the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, PA, will set the tone for Hillary Clinton’s nomination. MSNBC calls the movie “devastating” for presumptive Democratic nominee and says it “powerfully connects the dots.” The Guardian lauds the film as “a powerful message, one that is clearly designed to stir up trouble at the convention at just the moment when Clinton should be reveling in her victory in the Democratic race.” And the Fiscal Times warns that Clinton Cash is a “weapon that could knock Clinton out.”
The film, based on the New York Timesbestselling investigative book Clinton Cash by Breitbart Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer, has sent shockwaves through media. The New York Times, Washington Post, ABC News, and other Establishment Media have verified and confirmed the book’s explosive revelations about how Hillary Clinton auctioned State Department policies to foreign Clinton Foundation donors and benefactors who then paid Bill Clinton tens of millions of dollars in speaking fees.
Time says the movie’s power comes from its focus persuading liberals. “[The film is] a scathing broadside aimed at persuading liberals,” reports Time. It is “likely to leave on-the-fence Clinton supporters who see it feeling more unsure about casting a vote for her....
fake news/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/22/global-airing-clinton-cash-documentary-breitbart-email-sign/
Cactus Jack wrote:Fletch wrote:Who is Frank Giustra?
Who gave $145 million to the Clinton Foundation and at what time?
Why did the Secretary of State have to sign off agreement to sell Uranium One?
1 - Frank Giustra is a man who gave $141 million to the Clinton Foundation 3 years after he had sold his stake in Uranium One, he had no financial interest in Uranium One at the time the deal was agreed.
2 - No-one. Frank Giustra gave $141 million to the Clinton Foundation 3 years after he had sold his stake in Uranium One - he had no financial interest in the deal when it was approved. The other four million came from various charities based in Canada who had Uranium One as a part of diversified investment portfolio - it would be like saying Tesco's donation to the Conservative Party comes from an ordinary worker whose pensions fund invest in Tesco.
3 - The Secretary of State did not have to sign off and did not do so. The State Department and nine other departments had to briefed and were expected to raise any concerns through the US Nuclear Regulator and Utah's State Regulator. The State Department had no power to approve or prevent the sale.
To go further Hilary Clinton did not attend CFIUS when the matter was discussed but placed the matter in the hands of a State Department official who was given full delegated authority. No report of the meeting was ever given to Hilary Clinton, nor did she ask for one.
To go further still no Uranium whatsoever left the United States for Russia as a result of this deal, Russia does not need uranium from the United States, Russia EXPORTS uranium. In fact the US imports most of its Uranium and around 18% of it comes FROM Russia to the United States.
Uranium One has been completely debunked many times.
Fletch wrote:Full article at https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/10/ ... keteering/
Stooo wrote:Fletch wrote:Full article at https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/10/ ... keteering/
Yeah, that looks like a totally unbiased and pretty reliable website. Reminds me of Infowars...
They won't investigate because there's nothing to investigate, it's that simple but you RW CT types can't get out of the cult-like group think that you share with the Scientology movement.
There's an arch criminal and gangster running the USA and you people validate him, it's like watching someone with early onset dementia.
Fletch wrote:Stooo wrote:Fletch wrote:Full article at https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/10/ ... keteering/
Yeah, that looks like a totally unbiased and pretty reliable website. Reminds me of Infowars...
They won't investigate because there's nothing to investigate, it's that simple but you RW CT types can't get out of the cult-like group think that you share with the Scientology movement.
There's an arch criminal and gangster running the USA and you people validate him, it's like watching someone with early onset dementia.
Me RW?
I've said before, this is nothing to do with Cinton bad, Trump good, or vice versa. Clintons are a criminal cabal and have been for decades. Trump is corrupt and dangerous but never been in positions of power until now.
Why you think pointing out one of them is a crook means support for the other one is beyond me. They are both crooks and both dangerous.
Stooo wrote:Fletch wrote:Stooo wrote:Fletch wrote:Full article at https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/10/ ... keteering/
Yeah, that looks like a totally unbiased and pretty reliable website. Reminds me of Infowars...
They won't investigate because there's nothing to investigate, it's that simple but you RW CT types can't get out of the cult-like group think that you share with the Scientology movement.
There's an arch criminal and gangster running the USA and you people validate him, it's like watching someone with early onset dementia.
Me RW?
I've said before, this is nothing to do with Cinton bad, Trump good, or vice versa. Clintons are a criminal cabal and have been for decades. Trump is corrupt and dangerous but never been in positions of power until now.
Why you think pointing out one of them is a crook means support for the other one is beyond me. They are both crooks and both dangerous.
You've just posted a link to a Wikileak twitter from 2015, Russia basically ran the site at that time and any anti Putin stuff was suppressed. Do you ever bother to read anything by Louise Mench or Carole Cadwalladr? Watch any MSNBC when the Maddow show is on?
As I say, you lot are in a cult.
Cactus Jack wrote:I got two lines into his rant and switched off as it was all stuff that has been totally debunked a thousand times.
Sadly there is a group for whom a Conspiracy Theory is all there is and any proof that there isn't a conspiracy is just more proof of how deep the conspiracy to suppress evidence of the conspiracy goes.
Naturally for this same group as Trump has set himself up as the anti-Clinton any evidence of criminal conduct against Trump, no matter how compelling and even when they heard it out of his own mouth, is similarly just more evidence of how deeply entrenched the Clinton Conspiracy is.
After the questioning was underway, some Republicans signaled they were unhappy with Comey’s level of cooperation. California Rep. Darrell Issa said Comey had two lawyers in the room, his personal lawyer and a lawyer from the Justice Department. He said the department lawyer repeatedly instructed Comey not to answer “a great many questions that are clearly items at the core of our investigation.”
Issa suggested the committee might bring Comey back because he wasn’t answering questions. Two other Republicans, Reps. Andy Biggs of Arizona and Mark Meadows of North Carolina, also suggested they might need a second session with Comey if they didn’t finish their interview by a late afternoon deadline. -AP
Fletch wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:I got two lines into his rant and switched off as it was all stuff that has been totally debunked a thousand times.
Sadly there is a group for whom a Conspiracy Theory is all there is and any proof that there isn't a conspiracy is just more proof of how deep the conspiracy to suppress evidence of the conspiracy goes.
Naturally for this same group as Trump has set himself up as the anti-Clinton any evidence of criminal conduct against Trump, no matter how compelling and even when they heard it out of his own mouth, is similarly just more evidence of how deeply entrenched the Clinton Conspiracy is.
Only ever reading the msm whitewash is always a good way to learn the truth...
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests