Clinton Ca$H...

[Maddog]

"we need to take a break, we need to have a word from our sponsor"

*cuts to Trump campaign ad*

The grim reaper in the beginning had me laughing my ass off.

[ATXn;D]

WOW! BREAKING=> Julian Assange Suggests Seth Rich – Who Was MURDERED in DC – Was Wikileaks DNC Source!

Jim Hoft Aug 9th, 2016 8:15 pm


On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”

The Metropolitan police posted a reward for information on Rich’s murder.

On Tuesday Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth rich.

Now this…
Julian Assange suggested on Tuesday that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant.

Via Mike Cernovich:

Julian Assange seems to suggests on Dutch television program Nieuwsuur that Seth Rich was the source for the Wikileaks-exposed DNC emails and was murdered.

Julian Assange: Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks. As a 27 year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.

Reporter: That was just a robbery, I believe. Wasn’t it?

Julian Assange: No. There’s no finding. So… I’m suggesting that our sources take risks.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08 ... t-dead-dc/

I hope Assange has good security...

His security is provided in part, by the Brits, so it's OK I guess.

This is getting interesting now.

Apparently thats not secure enough anymore...



‘October Surprise’ Thwarted? Wikileaks Cancels Highly Anticipated Tuesday Announcement Due to ‘Security Concerns’

http://heatst.com/politics/october-surp ... -concerns/

[ATXn;D]

Wikileaks Founder Moves Announcement to Berlin, Germany Tuesday Morning

Jim Hoft Oct 3rd, 2016 1:58 pm


Wikileaks founder Julian Assange moved his much anticipated announcement from the balcony of the Ecuadorian embassy in London due to security concerns.

Wikileaks will now hold their announcement in Berlin, Germany.

The announcement is now scheduled for 3 AM Eastern time.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10 ... y-morning/

[McAz]

Wikileaks Founder Moves Announcement to Berlin, Germany Tuesday Morning
Jim Hoft Oct 3rd, 2016 1:58 pm 35 Comments


Wikileaks founder Julian Assange moved his much anticipated announcement from the balcony of the Ecuadorian embassy in London due to security concerns.

Wikileaks will now hold their announcement in Berlin, Germany.

The announcement is now scheduled for 3 AM Eastern time.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10 ... y-morning/

Can't wait.

[ATXn;D]

Wikileaks Founder Moves Announcement to Berlin, Germany Tuesday Morning
Jim Hoft Oct 3rd, 2016 1:58 pm 35 Comments


Wikileaks founder Julian Assange moved his much anticipated announcement from the balcony of the Ecuadorian embassy in London due to security concerns.

Wikileaks will now hold their announcement in Berlin, Germany.

The announcement is now scheduled for 3 AM Eastern time.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10 ... y-morning/

Can't wait.

Me either...tick tock!

[ATXn;D]

BREAKING=> HERE IT IS… Guccifer 2.0 Releases CLINTON FOUNDATION DOCS! – Dems Funneled TARP Funds to their PACs!

Jim Hoft Oct 4th, 2016 2:56 pm

BREAKING——
GUCCIFER 2.0 RELEASES LEAKED CLINTON FOUNDATION DOCUMENTS!

He tweeted this out less than an hour ago…..

Many of you have been waiting for this, some even asked me to do it.

So, this is the moment. I hacked the Clinton Foundation server and downloaded hundreds of thousands of docs and donors’ databases.

Hillary Clinton and her staff don’t even bother about the information security. It was just a matter of time to gain access to the Clinton Foundation server.

Here’s the contents of one of the folders that I got from the

Guccifer 2.0 added this…..

DEMOCRATS FUNNELED TARP FUNDSBACK TO THEIR PACS!
That’s tax-payer bailout money that went right to the pockets of Democrat PACs!

“It looks like big banks and corporations agreed to donate to the Democrats a certain percentage of the allocated TARP funds.”

The documents show that Democrats:

Barney Frank
Carolyn Maloney
Chris Van Hollen
DCCC
James Clyburn
John Larson
Luis Gutierrez
Mel Watts
NANCY PELOSI
Paul Kanjorski

THEY ALL FUNNELED TARP FUNDS TO THEIR PACs!

The Liberal Establishment Raided the Treasury — And it took a Hacker to Catch Them!



http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10 ... documents/

[McAz]

Hmmm, Trumpy's Russian friends again - not sure that's enough to save him.

[ATXn;D]

Hmmm, Trumpy's Russian friends again - not sure that's enough to save him.

Its actually hillary who has the relationship with the russians....


Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

By JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIRE

APRIL 23, 2015

The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.


As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Read more here:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us ... mpany.html


Meanwhile, Julian Assange shreds the Trump russian connection conspiracy theory quite nicely just a few days ago....

phpBB [video]

[Maddog]

BREAKING=> HERE IT IS… Guccifer 2.0 Releases CLINTON FOUNDATION DOCS! – Dems Funneled TARP Funds to their PACs!

Jim Hoft Oct 4th, 2016 2:56 pm

BREAKING——
GUCCIFER 2.0 RELEASES LEAKED CLINTON FOUNDATION DOCUMENTS!

He tweeted this out less than an hour ago…..

Many of you have been waiting for this, some even asked me to do it.

So, this is the moment. I hacked the Clinton Foundation server and downloaded hundreds of thousands of docs and donors’ databases.

Hillary Clinton and her staff don’t even bother about the information security. It was just a matter of time to gain access to the Clinton Foundation server.

Here’s the contents of one of the folders that I got from the

Guccifer 2.0 added this…..

DEMOCRATS FUNNELED TARP FUNDSBACK TO THEIR PACS!
That’s tax-payer bailout money that went right to the pockets of Democrat PACs!

“It looks like big banks and corporations agreed to donate to the Democrats a certain percentage of the allocated TARP funds.”

The documents show that Democrats:

Barney Frank
Carolyn Maloney
Chris Van Hollen
DCCC
James Clyburn
John Larson
Luis Gutierrez
Mel Watts
NANCY PELOSI
Paul Kanjorski

THEY ALL FUNNELED TARP FUNDS TO THEIR PACs!

The Liberal Establishment Raided the Treasury — And it took a Hacker to Catch Them!



http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10 ... documents/

Hopefully some of the media is digesting this and putting it in simple terms for the American voter.

The American taxpayer bailed out banks and the banks used that money to contribute to politicians campaigns.

I'm of the opinion not enough people care, want to care or have the intelligence to understand.

[ATXn;D]

BREAKING=> HERE IT IS… Guccifer 2.0 Releases CLINTON FOUNDATION DOCS! – Dems Funneled TARP Funds to their PACs!

Jim Hoft Oct 4th, 2016 2:56 pm

BREAKING——
GUCCIFER 2.0 RELEASES LEAKED CLINTON FOUNDATION DOCUMENTS!

He tweeted this out less than an hour ago…..

Many of you have been waiting for this, some even asked me to do it.

So, this is the moment. I hacked the Clinton Foundation server and downloaded hundreds of thousands of docs and donors’ databases.

Hillary Clinton and her staff don’t even bother about the information security. It was just a matter of time to gain access to the Clinton Foundation server.

Here’s the contents of one of the folders that I got from the

Guccifer 2.0 added this…..

DEMOCRATS FUNNELED TARP FUNDSBACK TO THEIR PACS!
That’s tax-payer bailout money that went right to the pockets of Democrat PACs!

“It looks like big banks and corporations agreed to donate to the Democrats a certain percentage of the allocated TARP funds.”

The documents show that Democrats:

Barney Frank
Carolyn Maloney
Chris Van Hollen
DCCC
James Clyburn
John Larson
Luis Gutierrez
Mel Watts
NANCY PELOSI
Paul Kanjorski

THEY ALL FUNNELED TARP FUNDS TO THEIR PACs!

The Liberal Establishment Raided the Treasury — And it took a Hacker to Catch Them!



http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10 ... documents/

Hopefully some of the media is digesting this and putting it in simple terms for the American voter.

The American taxpayer bailed out banks and the banks used that money to contribute to politicians campaigns.

I'm of the opinion not enough people care, want to care or have the intelligence to understand.

Id make one modification...the American taxpayer borrowed money to bail out the banks.

Meanwhile, what do you want to bet the same thing happened with the almost trillion dollar stimulus package?

[ATXn;D]

phpBB [video]

The 'it would have been a joke if it had been said' is what is being referred to in current punditry as the old CYA Yale style...

[ATXn;D]

phpBB [video]

[ATXn;D]

Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC

When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign.

By DONNA BRAZILE November 02, 2017


Before I called Bernie Sanders, I lit a candle in my living room and put on some gospel music. I wanted to center myself for what I knew would be an emotional phone call.

I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton’s team had rigged the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested. I’d had my suspicions from the moment I walked in the door of the DNC a month or so earlier, based on the leaked emails. But who knew if some of them might have been forged? I needed to have solid proof, and so did Bernie.

So I followed the money. My predecessor, Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, had not been the most active chair in fundraising at a time when President Barack Obama’s neglect had left the party in significant debt. As Hillary’s campaign gained momentum, she resolved the party’s debt and put it on a starvation diet. It had become dependent on her campaign for survival, for which she expected to wield control of its operations.

Debbie was not a good manager. She hadn’t been very interested in controlling the party—she let Clinton’s headquarters in Brooklyn do as it desired so she didn’t have to inform the party officers how bad the situation was. How much control Brooklyn had and for how long was still something I had been trying to uncover for the last few weeks.

By September 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart.

The Saturday morning after the convention in July, I called Gary Gensler, the chief financial officer of Hillary’s campaign. He wasted no words. He told me the Democratic Party was broke and $2 million in debt.

“What?” I screamed. “I am an officer of the party and they’ve been telling us everything is fine and they were raising money with no problems.”

That wasn’t true, he said. Officials from Hillary’s campaign had taken a look at the DNC’s books. Obama left the party $24 million in debt—$15 million in bank debt and more than $8 million owed to vendors after the 2012 campaign—and had been paying that off very slowly. Obama’s campaign was not scheduled to pay it off until 2016. Hillary for America (the campaign) and the Hillary Victory Fund (its joint fundraising vehicle with the DNC) had taken care of 80 percent of the remaining debt in 2016, about $10 million, and had placed the party on an allowance.

If I didn’t know about this, I assumed that none of the other officers knew about it, either. That was just Debbie’s way. In my experience she didn’t come to the officers of the DNC for advice and counsel. She seemed to make decisions on her own and let us know at the last minute what she had decided, as she had done when she told us about the hacking only minutes before the Washington Post broke the news.

On the phone Gary told me the DNC had needed a $2 million loan, which the campaign had arranged.

“No! That can’t be true!” I said. “The party cannot take out a loan without the unanimous agreement of all of the officers.”

On the phone Gary told me the DNC had needed a $2 million loan, which the campaign had arranged.

“No! That can’t be true!” I said. “The party cannot take out a loan without the unanimous agreement of all of the officers.”

“Gary, how did they do this without me knowing?” I asked. “I don’t know how Debbie relates to the officers,” Gary said. He described the party as fully under the control of Hillary’s campaign, which seemed to confirm the suspicions of the Bernie camp. The campaign had the DNC on life support, giving it money every month to meet its basic expenses, while the campaign was using the party as a fund-raising clearinghouse. Under FEC law, an individual can contribute a maximum of $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign. But the limits are much higher for contributions to state parties and a party’s national committee.

Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund—that figure represented $10,000 to each of the 32 states’ parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement—$320,000—and $33,400 to the DNC. The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn.

“Wait,” I said. “That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You’re telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?”

Gary said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.

“That was the deal that Robby struck with Debbie,” he explained, referring to campaign manager Robby Mook. “It was to sustain the DNC. We sent the party nearly $20 million from September until the convention, and more to prepare for the election.”

“What’s the burn rate, Gary?” I asked. “How much money do we need every month to fund the party?”

The burn rate was $3.5 million to $4 million a month, he said.

I gasped. I had a pretty good sense of the DNC’s operations after having served as interim chair five years earlier. Back then the monthly expenses were half that. What had happened? The party chair usually shrinks the staff between presidential election campaigns, but Debbie had chosen not to do that. She had stuck lots of consultants on the DNC payroll, and Obama’s consultants were being financed by the DNC, too.

When we hung up, I was livid. Not at Gary, but at this mess I had inherited. I knew that Debbie had outsourced a lot of the management of the party and had not been the greatest at fundraising. I would not be that kind of chair, even if I was only an interim chair. Did they think I would just be a surrogate for them, get on the road and rouse up the crowds? I was going to manage this party the best I could and try to make it better, even if Brooklyn did not like this. It would be weeks before I would fully understand the financial shenanigans that were keeping the party on life support.

Right around the time of the convention, the leaked emails revealed Hillary’s campaign was grabbing money from the state parties for its own purposes, leaving the states with very little to support down-ballot races. A Politico story published on May 2, 2016, described the big fund-raising vehicle she had launched through the states the summer before, quoting a vow she had made to rebuild “the party from the ground up … when our state parties are strong, we win. That’s what will happen.”

Yet the states kept less than half of 1 percent of the $82 million they had amassed from the extravagant fund-raisers Hillary’s campaign was holding, just as Gary had described to me when he and I talked in August. When the Politico story described this arrangement as “essentially … money laundering” for the Clinton campaign, Hillary’s people were outraged at being accused of doing something shady. Bernie’s people were angry for their own reasons, saying this was part of a calculated strategy to throw the nomination to Hillary.

I wanted to believe Hillary, who made campaign finance reform part of her platform, but I had made this pledge to Bernie and did not want to disappoint him. I kept asking the party lawyers and the DNC staff to show me the agreements that the party had made for sharing the money they raised, but there was a lot of shuffling of feet and looking the other way.

When I got back from a vacation in Martha’s Vineyard, I at last found the document that described it all: the Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

I had been wondering why it was that I couldn’t write a press release without passing it by Brooklyn. Well, here was the answer.

When the party chooses the nominee, the custom is that the candidate’s team starts to exercise more control over the party. If the party has an incumbent candidate, as was the case with Clinton in 1996 or Obama in 2012, this kind of arrangement is seamless because the party already is under the control of the president. When you have an open contest without an incumbent and competitive primaries, the party comes under the candidate’s control only after the nominee is certain. When I was manager of Al Gore’s campaign in 2000, we started inserting our people into the DNC in June. This victory fund agreement, however, had been signed in August 2015, just four months after Hillary announced her candidacy and nearly a year before she officially had the nomination.

I had tried to search out any other evidence of internal corruption that would show that the DNC was rigging the system to throw the primary to Hillary, but I could not find any in party affairs or among the staff. I had gone department by department, investigating individual conduct for evidence of skewed decisions, and I was happy to see that I had found none. Then I found this agreement.

The funding arrangement with HFA and the victory fund agreement was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical. If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.

I had to keep my promise to Bernie. I was in agony as I dialed him. Keeping this secret was against everything that I stood for, all that I valued as a woman and as a public servant.

“Hello, senator. I’ve completed my review of the DNC and I did find the cancer,” I said. “But I will not kill the patient.”

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... 016-215774

[Guest]

Putin's 'bots are getting desperate aren't they?

[Cannydc]

America has a complete fool for a president, and their only way of dealing with it is an endless dose of 'whataboutery' ???

Pitiful.