Clinton Ca$H...

[wutang]

Only the most deluded Clinton supporter couldn't see how rigged the DNC was last year.

Bernie would have won against Trump.

The Dems shit the bed instead.

[Guest]

America has a complete fool for a president, and their only way of dealing with it is an endless dose of 'whataboutery' ???

Pitiful.

C'mom Canny you're ex-military, what else did you expect from Septics?

The only thing exceptional about America is how exceptionally stupid Americans are.

[Stooo]

[b]Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC

Buttery males, get over it, you won.

Meanwhile...

[ATXn;D]

[b]Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC

Buttery males, get over it, you won.

Meanwhile...

Yawn...
Tell it to donna brazille, democrat and former head of the dnc...
And elizabeth warren, dem senator and member of democrat party leadership.
They're the ones making it mews. This IS a news section, yes?

Meanwhile, mueller is focused on the podestas now, aka 'company B' in the indictment...which btw, dealt with issues pre-dating Trumps presidential run, doesnt mention Trump and has nothing to do with collusion.

And muellers conflicted himself, (as are mccabe and rosenstein) and has issues of his own. His swamp buddies couldnt keep that gag order in place on that fbi informant in the uranium one case. He'll be testifying before congress now.

[Stooo]

[b]Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC

Buttery males, get over it, you won.

Meanwhile...

Yawn...
Tell it to donna brazille, democrat and former head of the dnc...
And elizabeth warren, dem senator and member of democrat party leadership.
They're the ones making it mews. This IS a news section, yes?

Meanwhile, mueller is focused on the podestas now, aka 'company B' in the indictment...which btw, dealt with issues pre-dating Trumps presidential run, doesnt mention Trump and has nothing to do with collusion.

And muellers conflicted himself, (as are mccabe and rosenstein) and has issues of his own. His swamp buddies couldnt keep that gag order in place on that fbi informant in the uranium one case. He'll be testifying before congress now.

Mueller is doing fine and sticking to the letter of the law. Any more email bollocks about the person who lost to distract people with?

[ATXn;D]

Actually, muellers not fine.


Republicans seek special counsel's removal from Russia probe

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reute ... SKBN1D31W8


We need a Robert Mueller resignation or a second special counsel

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatod ... 102990890/

[Stooo]

Actually, muellers not fine.


Republicans seek special counsel's removal from Russia probe

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reute ... SKBN1D31W8


We need a Robert Mueller resignation or a second special counsel

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatod ... 102990890/

[ATXn;D]

FBI informant in Obama-era Russian nuclear bribery cleared to testify before Congress

The Justice Department on Wednesday night released a former FBI informant from a confidentiality agreement, allowing him to testify before Congress about what he witnessed while undercover about the Russian nuclear industry's efforts to win favorable decisions during the Obama administration.

Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores confirmed to The Hill a deal had been reached clearing the informant to talk to Congress for the first time, nearly eight years after he first went undercover for the FBI.

"As of tonight, the Department of Justice has authorized the informant to disclose to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, as well as one member of each of their staffs, any information or documents he has concerning alleged corruption or bribery involving transactions in the uranium market, including but not limited to anything related to Vadim Mikerin, Rosatom, Tenex, Uranium One, or the Clinton Foundation," she said.

Multiple congressional committees have been seeking to interview the informant, whose name has not been released publicly, because he stayed undercover for nearly five years providing agents information on Russia's aggressive efforts to grow its atomic energy business in America.

His work helped the Justice Department secure convictions against Russia's top commercial nuclear executive in the United States, a Russian financier in New Jersey, and the head of a U.S. uranium trucking company in what prosecutors said was a long-running racketeering scheme involving bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering.

But the informant was unable to provide answers to lawmakers' recent inquiries because he had signed a nondisclosure agreement with the bureau. He also was forced by the Justice Department in 2016 to withdraw a lawsuit that threatened to call attention to the case during last year's presidential election.

The man's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday night that the FBI sent her a formal letter saying it no longer had any reason to ask the informant to keep his work confidential, clearing the way for him to potentially testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, the House Intelligence Committee and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The committees are keen to learn what the informant knows about any Russian efforts to curry favor with Bill and Hillary Clinton, to win Obama administration approval for Moscow's purchase of large uranium assets in the United States or to secure billions in new uranium sales contracts with American utilities.

"The FBI has informed me that they are releasing my client from his [nondisclosure agreement] so that he can testify to Congress about his work uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with the Clintons in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration," Toensing said.

"He is now able and willing to talk with the congressional committees seeking his testimony, though I will be working with all parties to ensure his identity remains confidential to ensure his safety," she added.

Russia's uranium business drew controversy starting in 2015 when it was revealed that former President Clinton collected a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank and millions more in charitable donations from those interested in the Uranium One deal while his wife Hillary Clinton served as secretary of State. Russia's Tenex nuclear sales arm also secured billions in new American nuclear fuel contracts about the same time.

The Obama administration said they saw no national security reasons to block the deals, one of which gave Russian President Vladimir Putin control of 20 percent of America's uranium stockpile.

But last week a series of stories published in The Hill disclosed that before those decisions were made, the FBI had gathered extensive evidence that Mikerin, Tenex's chief executive inside the United States, was directing a massive bribery scheme, compromising an American trucking company that shipped uranium for Russia.

The evidence was first gathered in 2009, but charges weren't brought until 2014. Mikerin pleaded guilty a year later to a money laundering charge and is currently in prison.

But key members of Congress said they weren't alerted to the case at the time and are now deeply concerned the Obama administration had a good security reason not to approve the deals given that corruption was uncovered.


https://www.google.com/amp/thehill.com/ ... fore%3famp

Guess who was head of the fbi during this period?

[Rolluplostinspace]

America was created by Lewis Carroll.

[ATXn;D]

DWS, Perkins Coie May Have Engaged CrowdStrike Instead Of FBI Without Consulting DNC Officers

November 2nd, 2017

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the former head of the Democratic National Committee, did not tell the DNC’s own officers about a breach on its servers for more than a month after learning about it, according to then-DNC officer Donna Brazile.

Wasserman Schultz alerted the officers of the breach only when The Washington Post was about to make the revelations public, Brazile writes in an excerpt of the book Politico ran Thursday. The DNC instead enlisted the law firm of Perkins Coie to make major decisions, including how to handle the breach of its servers that led to an embarrassing email dump.

The timing suggests the DNC’s unusual and significant choice to have the private law firm CrowdStrike conduct the investigation into the breach, rather than turn the evidence over to law enforcement, was made without consulting DNC officers.

“She told [officers] about the hacking only minutes before the Washington Post broke the news,” Brazile wrote.

A June 14, 2016, article by the Post quoted “committee officials and security experts who responded to the breach” and said “DNC leaders were tipped to the hack in late April.”

“Chief executive Amy Dacey got a call from her operations chief saying that their information technology team had noticed some unusual network activity,” WaPo reported. Dacey enlisted a lawyer from Perkins Coie, who “called in” the private security firm CrowdStrike “to handle the DNC breach.”

Perkins Coie is the same law firm that paid for the Trump dossier using the DNC’s funds. DNC officials including Wasserman Schultz claim they had no idea that their organization had indirectly funded the infamous document.

Brazile’s report on the timing of DNC officials learning about the breach raises questions about why Wasserman Schultz was not engaged in immediate high-level discussions with the DNC’s officers about the breach, which she has characterized as “an all-out assault on American democracy” carried out by a foreign government.

Former President Barack Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson testified in June 2017 before Congress that the DNC declined help from his agency after the email system was hacked.

“The response I got was, the FBI had spoken to them. They don’t want our help. They have CrowdStrike, the cyber security firm,” Johnson said. “I recall very clearly that I was not pleased that we were not in there helping them patch this vulnerability.”

Wasserman Schultz strongly disputed Johnson’s testimony.

“He’s wrong in every respect,” she said. She claimed she had never been informed of the FBI’s offer and said the FBI was the one who did not loop in high-level officials, saying it did not “do anything other than lob a phone call into our tech support through our main switchboard.”

“How is it that the FBI or DHS or any federal agency that was concerned about a foreign enemy state intruding on the networks of one of the two major political parties did not think it important enough to go higher than a tech support staffer?” she asked. “It is astounding and outrageous.”

Regardless of any proactive attempts by the FBI, the DNC retained CrowdStrike to perform the investigation and evidence-gathering that would normally be done by law enforcement, instead of bringing it to the FBI after the DNC learned of it in April.

The decision not to loop in the FBI was major, in part because there are potential chain-of-custody issues when law enforcement do not do the work directly. And CrowdStrike can’t work hand-in-hand with prosecutors the way the FBI can. Even CrowdStrike’s CEO said, as paraphrased by the Post, that it is “extremely difficult for a civilian organization to protect itself from a skilled and determined state such as Russia.”

“Within 24 hours, CrowdStrike had installed software on the DNC’s computers so that it could analyze data that could indicate who had gained access, when and how,” the Post reported — all before, according to Brazile, the DNC’s own officers were informed of the breach by staff or by the Perkins Coie law firm.

In the Post’s June 2016 article Wasserman Schultz characterized the decision-making around the breach as “we,” saying “When we discovered the intrusion, we treated this like the serious incident it is and reached out to CrowdStrike immediately. Our team moved as quickly as possible to kick out the intruders and secure our network.”

Wasserman Schultz’s spokesman David Damron did not respond to the following questions posed by the Daily Caller News Foundation Thursday:

• What date did DWS learn of the DNC hack, and from whom?

• On what date was Crowdstrike hired to look into intrusion attempts, and on whose authorization?

• Who was the low-level support staffer who the FBI contacted, and did that staffer not tell any of their superiors about getting a call from the FBI?

The DNC breach is not the only time Wasserman Schultz’s response to news of a possible cyberbreach has seemed anemic. Not long after the breach became public, Capitol Police informed her that her longtime House IT staffer Imran Awan was a criminal suspect for “data transfer violations.” But she lashed out at the Capitol Police and kept Awan on staff, even adding his wife to the payroll, and hired an outside lawyer to prevent authorities from examining equipment tied to Awan.

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycal ... -officers/

[Stooo]

[Guest]

For those who don't know Robert Mueller is a registered Republican who was appointed by a Republican President and a Republic deputy of a Republican AG.

The problem with him seems to be he's the only Republican who didn't get the memo and is actually doing his fucking job

[Stooo]

For those who don't know Robert Mueller is a registered Republican who was appointed by a Republican President and a Republic deputy of a Republican AG.

The problem with him seems to be he's the only Republican who didn't get the memo and is actually doing his fucking job

Like Comey before him, "Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?"

[ATXn;D]

For those who don't know Robert Mueller is a registered Republican who was appointed by a Republican President and a Republic deputy of a Republican AG.

The problem with him seems to be he's the only Republican who didn't get the memo and is actually doing his fucking job

Lol, so are the bushes, and the rest of the rino establishment republicans who openly oppose Trump. Hardly a ringing endorsement for impartiality.

Now tell the class about his staff of lawyers. You left that very significant point out. Why?

And again, hes compromised on so many levels...from his bromance with comey to his looking the other way as hillary sold access when he was fbi director. To russia, coincidentally.

[Rolluplostinspace]

America are selling boeing aircraft to Russia while forcing Europe to obey the sanctions as set out by America. Huerting Germany massively.
America buy all their heavy lift rockets for space payloads from Russia because they can't make them that fast of that high quality and high tech at that price.
Why do suspect all this Russia stuff to be yet another distracting smokescreen?