No London Fire Thread?

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby wutang » Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:50 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Going by the News media no one in authority has come forward to say that it was a lie.


Over a dozen tenants have said it was a lie.
So who are you going to believe Tory liars who cut corners resulting in 100+ plus deaths or the tenants?


Yep. Profits before people at all costs (such as killing a 100 of them in an inferno)

Check out this trash:

Unfortunately, “other peoples’ money” has a way of ultimately coming out of our own pockets. If it costs more to build buildings, then rents will rise. People will be forced to live in smaller spaces, perhaps farther away. Some of them, in fact, may be forced to commute by automobile, and then die in a car accident. We don’t see those costs in the same way as we see a fire’s victims; we will never know the name of the guy who was killed in a car accident because he had to live far from work because rents rose because regulators required sprinkler systems.

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles ... tower-fire


"We cant do something that would save lives because of some hypothetical car crash I just made up" (also most commuting in london is tube/train).

If only there was someway to stop property owners from increasing rents...

oh wait that will mean landlords accepting lower profits, that would be a real tragedy (not people dying in infernos)
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby Vam » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:42 pm

Jeez, Wutang...like many others before me, I have to ask WTF you're doing still living in the UK, given the monumental disdain and disgust you constantly voice about all aspects of British life, and its indigenous population? :dunno:

Is there anything you DO actually enjoy about living there? Like the Benefits, maybe?
User avatar
Vam
 
Posts: 19294
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:57 am

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby wutang » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:24 pm

Vam wrote:Jeez, Wutang...like many others before me, I have to ask WTF you're doing still living in the UK, given the monumental disdain and disgust you constantly voice about all aspects of British life, and its indigenous population? :dunno:

Is there anything you DO actually enjoy about living there? Like the Benefits, maybe?



Keep your trolling to the arms section, thank you :snooty:
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby Rockstar » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:35 pm

McAz wrote:
Guest wrote:
Keyser wrote:What makes me laugh May was being hailed by the press as the second coming a few months ago - now after robotic, ice cold incompetence throughout the election and beyond she is a laughing stock and probably does not even understand why.

Her handling of this crisis has been utterly awful. :shake head:


Her handling of Brexshit is a joke
Her handling of Manchester was a joke
Her handling of London Bridge was a joke
Her handling of Grenfell Tower was a joke
Anyone see a pattern here?


Yes, she is the most uncaring and unfunny joke to disgrace the position of PM in living memory. And though she will soon be gone the problem of the Tories and their nasty paymasters and peasant arselickers will remain.


When will people start seeing the government strictly in a vendor-service provider light? People pay taxes and in return the Government provides services like infrastructure, law and order etc. Why all this hoopla about expecting compassion from the PM and others in government? As long as the country prospers the PM could be a heartless creature or an amoeba.

Why is compassion from one person so important? When will people start focusing on the policies of a Government instead of judging subjective traits? We are in 2017 ffs.
User avatar
Rockstar
 
Posts: 13236
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:40 pm

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby wutang » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:38 pm

How austerity is used to redistribute money to the rich Kensington style.


Image


The council has £209million in reserves - which is built up by under-spending on social services and, of course, cutting corners on redeveloping places like Grenwell

BLOOD MONEY!!!!!

Now crying that it cant rehouse the survivors in the area

You can rehouse quite a lot of people with £209million thumbsup:
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby McAz » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:40 pm

Rockstar wrote:
McAz wrote:
Guest wrote:
Keyser wrote:What makes me laugh May was being hailed by the press as the second coming a few months ago - now after robotic, ice cold incompetence throughout the election and beyond she is a laughing stock and probably does not even understand why.

Her handling of this crisis has been utterly awful. :shake head:


Her handling of Brexshit is a joke
Her handling of Manchester was a joke
Her handling of London Bridge was a joke
Her handling of Grenfell Tower was a joke
Anyone see a pattern here?


Yes, she is the most uncaring and unfunny joke to disgrace the position of PM in living memory. And though she will soon be gone the problem of the Tories and their nasty paymasters and peasant arselickers will remain.


When will people start seeing the government strictly in a vendor-service provider light? People pay taxes and in return the Government provides services like infrastructure, law and order etc. Why all this hoopla about expecting compassion from the PM and others in government? As long as the country prospers the PM could be a heartless creature or an amoeba.

Why is compassion from one person so important? When will people start focusing on the policies of a Government instead of judging subjective traits? We are in 2017 ffs.


Compassion is a virtue whosoever possesses it. But you're right, the government is there to serve the people - and not just the rich and powerful.
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby wutang » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:44 pm

Image


Also one of the landlords who voted against the housing fit for human habitation bill.

He was glad when the taxpayer handed over £7.6million to do up his wife's ancestral home
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby Red Okktober » Sat Jun 17, 2017 5:45 pm

wutang wrote:How austerity is used to redistribute money to the rich Kensington style.





The council has £209million in reserves - which is built up by under-spending on social services and, of course, cutting corners on redeveloping places like Grenwell

BLOOD MONEY!!!!!

Now crying that it cant rehouse the survivors in the area

You can rehouse quite a lot of people with £209million thumbsup:


Actually, you need physical homes, not money, to rehouse people, you anarchist halfwit. You do realise there's a helluva long waiting list for social housing? For sure, these people will be given priority over new immigrants, and even more so over indigenous Brits who have been waiting for years, but you can't create vacant homes out of thin air.

Why do you not understand the landlord/tenant relationship? You seem to have problems getting your head around the idea that people who can afford it, buy property, then rent it out at a profit, to those who can afford the rent. It's not rocket science. Do you think we should all be wearing Chairman Mao suits and living in identical concrete boxes, with no one ever making money out of enterprise? If so, fuck off to China or North Korea or somewhere.

Btw, what happened to your childish post about Tories not liking 'poor smelly people', only it seems to have disappeared?
User avatar
Red Okktober
 
Posts: 6388
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:37 pm

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby McAz » Sat Jun 17, 2017 5:53 pm

Red Okktober wrote:
wutang wrote:How austerity is used to redistribute money to the rich Kensington style.





The council has £209million in reserves - which is built up by under-spending on social services and, of course, cutting corners on redeveloping places like Grenwell

BLOOD MONEY!!!!!

Now crying that it cant rehouse the survivors in the area

You can rehouse quite a lot of people with £209million thumbsup:


Actually, you need physical homes, not money, to rehouse people, you anarchist halfwit. You do realise there's a helluva long waiting list for social housing? For sure, these people will be given priority over new immigrants, and even more so over indigenous Brits who have been waiting for years, but you can't create vacant homes out of thin air.

Why do you not understand the landlord/tenant relationship? You seem to have problems getting your head around the idea that people who can afford it, buy property, then rent it out at a profit, to those who can afford the rent. It's not rocket science. Do you think we should all be wearing Chairman Mao suits and living in identical concrete boxes, with no one ever making money out of enterprise? If so, fuck off to China or North Korea or somewhere.

Btw, what happened to your childish post about Tories not liking 'poor smelly people', only it seems to have disappeared?


Did you enjoy the fire?
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby Guest » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:40 pm

Red Okktober wrote:
wutang wrote:How austerity is used to redistribute money to the rich Kensington style.

The council has £209million in reserves - which is built up by under-spending on social services and, of course, cutting corners on redeveloping places like Grenwell

BLOOD MONEY!!!!!

Now crying that it cant rehouse the survivors in the area

You can rehouse quite a lot of people with £209million thumbsup:


Actually, you need physical homes, not money, to rehouse people, you anarchist halfwit. You do realise there's a helluva long waiting list for social housing? For sure, these people will be given priority over new immigrants, and even more so over indigenous Brits who have been waiting for years, but you can't create vacant homes out of thin air.

Why do you not understand the landlord/tenant relationship? You seem to have problems getting your head around the idea that people who can afford it, buy property, then rent it out at a profit, to those who can afford the rent. It's not rocket science. Do you think we should all be wearing Chairman Mao suits and living in identical concrete boxes, with no one ever making money out of enterprise? If so, fuck off to China or North Korea or somewhere.

Btw, what happened to your childish post about Tories not liking 'poor smelly people', only it seems to have disappeared?


What are you twattering on about?
Care to condemn the Tories for this death trap?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby wutang » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:53 pm

Red Okktober wrote:Actually, you need physical homes, not money, to rehouse people, you anarchist halfwit.



1,300 empty homes in the borough. Left empty because profiteering scumlords... sorry... landlords, who would rather they sat empty, no doubt waiting for prices to rise high enough to cash in (parasites)

Requisition them and house the survivors in them until you have built them new homes.

They can use some of their £209million reserves to cover the cost :thumbsup:

Oh and the majority of Brits support the idea

Image

:thumbsup:
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby Stooo » Sat Jun 17, 2017 7:14 pm

wutang wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Actually, you need physical homes, not money, to rehouse people, you anarchist halfwit.



1,300 empty homes in the borough. Left empty because profiteering scumlords... sorry... landlords, who would rather they sat empty, no doubt waiting for prices to rise high enough to cash in (parasites)

Requisition them and house the survivors in them until you have built them new homes.

They can use some of their £209million reserves to cover the cost :thumbsup:

Oh and the majority of Brits support the idea

Image

:thumbsup:


And then the owner says that he's moving in and invokes the HRA, check and mate.
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118566
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby Guest » Sat Jun 17, 2017 7:18 pm

Stooo wrote:
wutang wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Actually, you need physical homes, not money, to rehouse people, you anarchist halfwit.



1,300 empty homes in the borough. Left empty because profiteering scumlords... sorry... landlords, who would rather they sat empty, no doubt waiting for prices to rise high enough to cash in (parasites)

Requisition them and house the survivors in them until you have built them new homes.

They can use some of their £209million reserves to cover the cost :thumbsup:

Oh and the majority of Brits support the idea

Image

:thumbsup:


And then the owner says that he's moving in and invokes the HRA, check and mate.


How can he do that?
He would have had to sign it over beforehand.
He doesn't have a legal leg to stand on by signing it over then saying he needs it.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby Stooo » Sat Jun 17, 2017 7:23 pm

Guest wrote:
Stooo wrote:
wutang wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Actually, you need physical homes, not money, to rehouse people, you anarchist halfwit.



1,300 empty homes in the borough. Left empty because profiteering scumlords... sorry... landlords, who would rather they sat empty, no doubt waiting for prices to rise high enough to cash in (parasites)

Requisition them and house the survivors in them until you have built them new homes.

They can use some of their £209million reserves to cover the cost :thumbsup:

Oh and the majority of Brits support the idea

Image

:thumbsup:


And then the owner says that he's moving in and invokes the HRA, check and mate.


How can he do that?
He would have had to sign it over beforehand.
He doesn't have a legal leg to stand on by signing it over then saying he needs it.


Legal, good word :thumbsup:

So these multi-millionare's club together and take legal action against who exactly? The Corbyn government or the local council on a legal beano that will take years and cost millions. Have a think chap.
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118566
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: No London Fire Thread?

Postby Guest » Sat Jun 17, 2017 7:31 pm

Stooo wrote:
Guest wrote:
Stooo wrote:
wutang wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Actually, you need physical homes, not money, to rehouse people, you anarchist halfwit.



1,300 empty homes in the borough. Left empty because profiteering scumlords... sorry... landlords, who would rather they sat empty, no doubt waiting for prices to rise high enough to cash in (parasites)

Requisition them and house the survivors in them until you have built them new homes.

They can use some of their £209million reserves to cover the cost :thumbsup:

Oh and the majority of Brits support the idea

Image

:thumbsup:


And then the owner says that he's moving in and invokes the HRA, check and mate.


How can he do that?
He would have had to sign it over beforehand.
He doesn't have a legal leg to stand on by signing it over then saying he needs it.


Legal, good word :thumbsup:

So these multi-millionare's club together and take legal action against who exactly? The Corbyn government or the local council on a legal beano that will take years and cost millions. Have a think chap.


It would be thrown out of Court with costs awarded against the claimant.
User avatar
Guest
 

PreviousNext

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests