Dogs Sleeping Forum

In 2000 a report to the house of commons raising concerns about fire safety of clad buildings following southampton fire was ignored by labour government for 10 years.

Blood on their hands whilst simultaneously playing politics with dreadful tragedy.

Viper wrote:In 2000 a report to the house of commons raising concerns about fire safety of clad buildings following southampton fire was ignored by labour government for 10 years.

Blood on their hands whilst simultaneously playing politics with dreadful tragedy.

NEW Labour

So what is your excuse for the Tories doing fuck all?

Corbyn mcdonnell abbott etc...all members of PLP back then yes?

Viper wrote:Corbyn mcdonnell abbott etc...all members of PLP back then yes?

Ha, ha, ha - desperate or what? Come on Vipes - surely a BSc (hons) like you can do better?

Viper wrote:Corbyn mcdonnell abbott etc...all members of PLP back then yes?

So what is your excuse for the Tories doing fuck all?

If you don't know just say

McAz wrote:

Viper wrote:Corbyn mcdonnell abbott etc...all members of PLP back then yes?

Ha, ha, ha - desperate or what? Come on Vipes - surely a BSc (hons) like you can do better?

Sad cunts tend to trawl the fake news sites like Guido and then post known lies on sites like this

Please show where i am incorrect.

If not i will expect you to call for resignation of corbyn mcdonnell etc...unless of course you have no interest other than political game playing with this tragedy?

Seventeen years ago?

Talk about desperate.

Stooo wrote:Seventeen years ago?

Talk about desperate.

It could have been prevented 17 years ago? Should it have been?

Viper wrote:

Stooo wrote:Seventeen years ago?

Talk about desperate.

It could have been prevented 17 years ago? Should it have been?

Were they considering cladding the building 17 years ago, if so, who were 'they'?

Stooo wrote:

Viper wrote:

Stooo wrote:Seventeen years ago?

Talk about desperate.

It could have been prevented 17 years ago? Should it have been?

Were they considering cladding the building 17 years ago, if so, who were 'they'?

He'll blame the former Labour council of Ken and Chels of 1966 in a minute.

In the meantime he ignores the last seven years

Viper wrote:In 2000 a report to the house of commons raising concerns about fire safety of clad buildings following southampton fire was ignored by labour government for 10 years.

Blood on their hands whilst simultaneously playing politics with dreadful tragedy.

Viper wrote:In 2000 a report to the house of commons raising concerns about fire safety of clad buildings following southampton fire was ignored by labour government for 10 years.

Blood on their hands whilst simultaneously playing politics with dreadful tragedy.

The opinion of someone who hijacks tragedy to further their agenda is of no consquence.

Guest wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Viper wrote:

Stooo wrote:Seventeen years ago?

Talk about desperate.

It could have been prevented 17 years ago? Should it have been?

Were they considering cladding the building 17 years ago, if so, who were 'they'?

He'll blame the former Labour council of Ken and Chels of 1966 in a minute.

In the meantime he ignores the last seven years

Hammond said this morning that this particular cladding is banned in the UK.

https://twitter.com/BBCNews/status/876361665112973312

Viper wrote:

Stooo wrote:Seventeen years ago?

Talk about desperate.

It could have been prevented 17 years ago? Should it have been?

As ever Viper is entirely disingenuous at best.

In 2013 Eric Pickles was asked change regulations so that all future routine maintenance of tower blocks would include a sprinkler system and all cladding should be a fireproof variety made with mineral wool. Homes and Communities Secretary Eric Pickles chose to listen to Conservative councils anxious not to put up Council Taxes too much rather than safety experts who foresaw that Grenfell Tower was only a matter of time.

The blood is very specifically on Eric Pickles hands