Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby McAz » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:47 pm

wutang wrote:
McAz wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Fair enough, if you want to believe newspaper editors are hate preachers, that's your prerogative. Funny as fuck though.

What next, people that daub graffiti on mosques, are what...comparable to suicide bombers? Punching someone in the face is just as bad as beheading someone?

That's how surreal this thread has become.


If only far-right fascist Thomas Mair and Islamophobic fascist Darren Osborne had confined their activities to surreal daubings on mosques.



Muslims should just accept the hate, abuse, vandalism, death threats, and assaults against them that are on the increase says someone who is isnt affected by it


Decent people must be shown that the fascist enemy within is not a solution to Muslim extremism but a contributory factor - they both support similar racist authoritarian ideologies.
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Guest » Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:00 pm

Red Okktober wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Those on the left are so desperate to downplay the threat from islam, that newspaper editors are now being called' hate preachers' and isis are being compared to football hooligans.


They are telling people who to hate, like it or not and it's been proved many times.

LoL that people genuinely believe this shit.


Yeah, lol that they believe the social wisdom of billionaires. Envy? Nah, I just want us to have a fair society.



Fair enough, if you want to believe newspaper editors are hate preachers, that's your prerogative. Funny as fuck though.

What next, people that daub graffiti on mosques, are what...comparable to suicide bombers? Punching someone in the face is just as bad as beheading someone?

That's how surreal this thread has become.


Who are responsible for this then?

Image

Answers on a postcard....
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Si_Crewe » Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:00 pm

McAz wrote:Ultra liberal left police. :roll:

English Defence League and British National Party as dangerous as Isis, warn Derbyshire Police

The English Defence League and the British National Party are "just as much of a real threat" as Islamic State (Isis), Derbyshire Police have said. Sergeant John Brooker said that his police force treat far-right groups the same way they would treat Isis.

"The biggest threat is very much centred on Syria and Iraq based on groups such as Islamic State, however, we certainly can't ignore the right-wing issues and the far-right issues that do exist in our communities and are just as much of a real threat in terms of community division, hatred and deplorable acts as anything else."


http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/english-defence-league-british-national-party-dangerous-isis-warn-derbyshire-police-1544728


Seems like somebody could use some lessons in comprehension.

Cops says "English Defence League and the British National Party are just as much of a real threat as Islamic State"
Listener hears "EDL are just as big a threat as IS"

That's a comprehension fail, right there.

All the cop has said is that they're both equally real threats.
One exists just as much as the other does.

He hasn't actually compared the danger presented by one group with the danger from the other.
He's just worded the comment in an ambiguous way, probably quite deliberately.
User avatar
Si_Crewe
 
Posts: 4586
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:33 am

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Guest » Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:03 pm

Si_Crewe wrote:
McAz wrote:Ultra liberal left police. :roll:

English Defence League and British National Party as dangerous as Isis, warn Derbyshire Police

The English Defence League and the British National Party are "just as much of a real threat" as Islamic State (Isis), Derbyshire Police have said. Sergeant John Brooker said that his police force treat far-right groups the same way they would treat Isis.

"The biggest threat is very much centred on Syria and Iraq based on groups such as Islamic State, however, we certainly can't ignore the right-wing issues and the far-right issues that do exist in our communities and are just as much of a real threat in terms of community division, hatred and deplorable acts as anything else."


http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/english-defence-league-british-national-party-dangerous-isis-warn-derbyshire-police-1544728


Seems like somebody could use some lessons in comprehension.

Cops says "English Defence League and the British National Party are just as much of a real threat as Islamic State"
Listener hears "EDL are just as big a threat as IS"

That's a comprehension fail, right there.

All the cop has said is that they're both equally real threats.
One exists just as much as the other does.

He hasn't actually compared the danger presented by one group with the danger from the other.
He's just worded the comment in an ambiguous way, probably quite deliberately.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8462205.stm

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... ic-8193152

So which is more dangerous?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby McAz » Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:05 pm

Si_Crewe wrote:
McAz wrote:Ultra liberal left police. :roll:

English Defence League and British National Party as dangerous as Isis, warn Derbyshire Police

The English Defence League and the British National Party are "just as much of a real threat" as Islamic State (Isis), Derbyshire Police have said. Sergeant John Brooker said that his police force treat far-right groups the same way they would treat Isis.

"The biggest threat is very much centred on Syria and Iraq based on groups such as Islamic State, however, we certainly can't ignore the right-wing issues and the far-right issues that do exist in our communities and are just as much of a real threat in terms of community division, hatred and deplorable acts as anything else."


http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/english-defence-league-british-national-party-dangerous-isis-warn-derbyshire-police-1544728


Seems like somebody could use some lessons in comprehension.

Cops says "English Defence League and the British National Party are just as much of a real threat as Islamic State"
Listener hears "EDL are just as big a threat as IS"

That's a comprehension fail, right there.

All the cop has said is that they're both equally real threats.
One exists just as much as the other does.

He hasn't actually compared the danger presented by one group with the danger from the other.
He's just worded the comment in an ambiguous way, probably quite deliberately.


Missing the word "potentially" I think - but in fairness, he's engaged in a public awareness exercise and must make the most of his 15 minutes.
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Si_Crewe » Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:57 pm

Guest wrote:So which is more dangerous?


Seriously?

You're asking me whether I think the EDL or IS is more dangerous?

I think I'm gonna go with the group that's engaged in wars throughout the middle east, has killed thousands in terrorist attacks and which claims to be on a crusade to rid the entire planet of people who don't believe the same fairy stories they do.

So, yeah. IS is more dangerous than EDL.

Somebody gonna disagree?
User avatar
Si_Crewe
 
Posts: 4586
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:33 am

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Keyser » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:08 pm

wutang wrote:
McAz wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Fair enough, if you want to believe newspaper editors are hate preachers, that's your prerogative. Funny as fuck though.

What next, people that daub graffiti on mosques, are what...comparable to suicide bombers? Punching someone in the face is just as bad as beheading someone?

That's how surreal this thread has become.


If only far-right fascist Thomas Mair and Islamophobic fascist Darren Osborne had confined their activities to surreal daubings on mosques.



Muslims should just accept the hate, abuse, vandalism, death threats, and assaults against them that are on the increase says someone who is isnt affected by it


Sadly they are often very intolerant of their own as well otherwise organisations like this would not have to be so clandestine.

Poor buggers.

http://ex-muslim.org.uk/

https://ex-muslim.org.uk/manifesto/

Islam ideology especially the Wahhabist version so common here thanks to Daesh Arabia is the very definition of intolerance and things are regressing.

Not what we are told by the pitiful apologists in authority but sadly true. :shake head:
User avatar
Keyser
 
Posts: 12710
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby rollup » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:11 pm

Keyser wrote:
wutang wrote:
McAz wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Fair enough, if you want to believe newspaper editors are hate preachers, that's your prerogative. Funny as fuck though.

What next, people that daub graffiti on mosques, are what...comparable to suicide bombers? Punching someone in the face is just as bad as beheading someone?

That's how surreal this thread has become.


If only far-right fascist Thomas Mair and Islamophobic fascist Darren Osborne had confined their activities to surreal daubings on mosques.



Muslims should just accept the hate, abuse, vandalism, death threats, and assaults against them that are on the increase says someone who is isnt affected by it


Sadly they are often very intolerant of their own as well otherwise organisations like this would not have to be so clandestine.

Poor buggers.

http://ex-muslim.org.uk/

https://ex-muslim.org.uk/manifesto/

Islam ideology especially the Wahhabist version so common here thanks to Daesh Arabia is the very definition of intolerance and things are regressing.

Not what we are told by the pitiful apologists in authority but sadly true. :shake head:

The Anglo American Zionist lot support train and arm ISIS through Wahabbi head chopping HQ Saudi Arabia.
That's the major problem.
User avatar
rollup
 
Posts: 16661
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: Wales and 49.0000° N, 6.0000° E

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Guest » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:14 pm

Keyser wrote:
wutang wrote:
McAz wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Fair enough, if you want to believe newspaper editors are hate preachers, that's your prerogative. Funny as fuck though.

What next, people that daub graffiti on mosques, are what...comparable to suicide bombers? Punching someone in the face is just as bad as beheading someone?

That's how surreal this thread has become.


If only far-right fascist Thomas Mair and Islamophobic fascist Darren Osborne had confined their activities to surreal daubings on mosques.



Muslims should just accept the hate, abuse, vandalism, death threats, and assaults against them that are on the increase says someone who is isnt affected by it


Sadly they are often very intolerant of their own as well otherwise organisations like this would not have to be so clandestine.

Poor buggers.

http://ex-muslim.org.uk/

https://ex-muslim.org.uk/manifesto/

Islam ideology especially the Wahhabist version so common here thanks to Daesh Arabia is the very definition of intolerance and things are regressing.

Not what we are told by the pitiful apologists in authority but sadly true. :shake head:


At least our government is boycotting these Fascist Wahhabist states.
I mean we would be in real trouble if we sold them WMDs.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Guest » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:22 pm

Si_Crewe wrote:
Guest wrote:So which is more dangerous?


Seriously?

You're asking me whether I think the EDL or IS is more dangerous?

I think I'm gonna go with the group that's engaged in wars throughout the middle east, has killed thousands in terrorist attacks and which claims to be on a crusade to rid the entire planet of people who don't believe the same fairy stories they do.

So, yeah. IS is more dangerous than EDL.

Somebody gonna disagree?


You have a serious problem with comprehension.
Which out of the BNP or EDL is worse?
Did I post a link showing IS?
No.
So how the fuck did you make that stupid leap? :off head:
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby McAz » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:26 pm

Guest wrote:Who are responsible for this then?

Image

Answers on a postcard....


I think this fella might be one such.

"Maybe most Moslems peaceful, but until they recognize and destroy their growing jihadist cancer they must be held responsible." (Rupert Murdoch)
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Guest » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:34 pm

Stooo wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Those on the left are so desperate to downplay the threat from islam, that newspaper editors are now being called' hate preachers' and isis are being compared to football hooligans.


They are telling people who to hate, like it or not and it's been proved many times.

LoL that people genuinely believe this shit.


Yeah, lol that they believe the social wisdom of billionaires. Envy? Nah, I just want us to have a fair society.



Fair enough, if you want to believe newspaper editors are hate preachers, that's your prerogative. Funny as fuck though.

What next, people that daub graffiti on mosques, are what...comparable to suicide bombers? Punching someone in the face is just as bad as beheading someone?

That's how surreal this thread has become.


I'm simply reinforcing the OP, you just seem to want to attack other posters rather than address the fact that's staring you in the face.


Ah come on Stoo FFS!

What about Aziz attacking other posters?

So far he's accused Red of being an arsonist, a supporter of Britain First, BNP etc etc.

Why your silence on HIS behaviour?
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby McAz » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:41 pm

Guest wrote:Ah come on Stoo FFS!

What about Aziz attacking other posters?

So far he's accused Red of being an arsonist, a supporter of Britain First, BNP etc etc.

Why your silence on HIS behaviour?


No-one here by that name, Red. :scratch:
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Stooo » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:55 pm

Guest wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Those on the left are so desperate to downplay the threat from islam, that newspaper editors are now being called' hate preachers' and isis are being compared to football hooligans.


They are telling people who to hate, like it or not and it's been proved many times.

LoL that people genuinely believe this shit.


Yeah, lol that they believe the social wisdom of billionaires. Envy? Nah, I just want us to have a fair society.



Fair enough, if you want to believe newspaper editors are hate preachers, that's your prerogative. Funny as fuck though.

What next, people that daub graffiti on mosques, are what...comparable to suicide bombers? Punching someone in the face is just as bad as beheading someone?

That's how surreal this thread has become.


I'm simply reinforcing the OP, you just seem to want to attack other posters rather than address the fact that's staring you in the face.


Ah come on Stoo FFS!

What about Aziz attacking other posters?

So far he's accused Red of being an arsonist, a supporter of Britain First, BNP etc etc.

Why your silence on HIS behaviour?


Typical snowflake, unable to discuss the issue yet whinges to the mods about hurt feelings. :roll:
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118694
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Our Acceptable Hate Preachers

Postby Si_Crewe » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:06 pm

Guest wrote:You have a serious problem with comprehension.
Which out of the BNP or EDL is worse?
Did I post a link showing IS?
No.
So how the fuck did you make that stupid leap? :off head:


Mostly because you poked your nose into a discussion about comparisons between the BNP/EDL and IS.

The fact that you can't manage to participate in such a discussion in a candid manner would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic. :hand:
User avatar
Si_Crewe
 
Posts: 4586
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:33 am

PreviousNext

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests