If you don't, then don't vote for supporting Wahhabism.
Other sensible parties don't support the funding of Wahhabist terrorists, do they?
rollup wrote:If there was justice and if there was any truth in the war on terror then S.A and it's royal family would have had a NATO makeover quite some time back.
It's the elephant in the room when it comes to the bogus war on terror.
Keyser wrote:rollup wrote:If there was justice and if there was any truth in the war on terror then S.A and it's royal family would have had a NATO makeover quite some time back.
It's the elephant in the room when it comes to the bogus war on terror.
A meteorite or comet striking the Kabba would do the world a big favour.
Keyser wrote:rollup wrote:If there was justice and if there was any truth in the war on terror then S.A and it's royal family would have had a NATO makeover quite some time back.
It's the elephant in the room when it comes to the bogus war on terror.
A meteorite or comet striking the Kabba would do the world a big favour.
calitom wrote:Now I am not calling the people on this thread idiots.Lets get that straight.
SA is a very dangerous and delicate balance w the Royal family on one side and radical islamic terorists on the other.
The wahabis are the military leaders and could take over the country and make it 100x worse.They dont because they are bought off by the royal family.
As slimey as the royals may be they serve a useful purpose.
So to all the holier than thou virtue signallers calling for the overthrow of the Royals..-Just be very wary of what you wish for.
You're welcome
calitom wrote:Now I am not calling the people on this thread idiots.Lets get that straight.
SA is a very dangerous and delicate balance w the Royal family on one side and radical islamic terorists on the other.
The wahabis are the military leaders and could take over the country and make it 100x worse.They dont because they are bought off by the royal family.
As slimey as the royals may be they serve a useful purpose.
So to all the holier than thou virtue signallers calling for the overthrow of the Royals..-Just be very wary of what you wish for.
You're welcome
calitom wrote:Now I am not calling the people on this thread idiots.Lets get that straight.
SA is a very dangerous and delicate balance w the Royal family on one side and radical islamic terorists on the other.
The wahabis are the military leaders and could take over the country and make it 100x worse.They dont because they are bought off by the royal family.
As slimey as the royals may be they serve a useful purpose.
So to all the holier than thou virtue signallers calling for the overthrow of the Royals..-Just be very wary of what you wish for.
You're welcome
rollup wrote:calitom wrote:Now I am not calling the people on this thread idiots.Lets get that straight.
SA is a very dangerous and delicate balance w the Royal family on one side and radical islamic terorists on the other.
The wahabis are the military leaders and could take over the country and make it 100x worse.They dont because they are bought off by the royal family.
As slimey as the royals may be they serve a useful purpose.
So to all the holier than thou virtue signallers calling for the overthrow of the Royals..-Just be very wary of what you wish for.
You're welcome
It's very powerful because we made it so.
It's the clerics to worry about not the military.
More than 10,000 people have died amid the ongoing U.S.-backed, Saudi-led war in Yemen, which has also destroyed the country’s health, water and sanitation systems, sparking a deadly cholera outbreak. The cholera death toll has risen to 1,054. The United Nations warns some 19 million of Yemen’s 28 million people need some form of aid, with many of them at risk of famine.
https://www.democracynow.org/2017/6/22/ ... a_yemen_is
calitom wrote:Now I am not calling the people on this thread idiots.Lets get that straight.
SA is a very dangerous and delicate balance w the Royal family on one side and radical islamic terorists on the other.
The wahabis are the military leaders and could take over the country and make it 100x worse.They dont because they are bought off by the royal family.
As slimey as the royals may be they serve a useful purpose.
So to all the holier than thou virtue signallers calling for the overthrow of the Royals..-Just be very wary of what you wish for.
You're welcome
wutang wrote:
Saudi's one 'military' strength (apart from the foreign mercenaries it hires) is the Islamist terror is funds and arms - no coincidence that ISIS/AL-Qaeda/etc are taking on the Saudi's rivals like Assad, Houthis, Iran, etc.
Rockstar wrote:wutang wrote:
Saudi's one 'military' strength (apart from the foreign mercenaries it hires) is the Islamist terror is funds and arms - no coincidence that ISIS/AL-Qaeda/etc are taking on the Saudi's rivals like Assad, Houthis, Iran, etc.
Sunnis terrorizing Shias like always.
Qatar is next.
Mohammed bin Salman named Saudi Arabia's crown prince
Saudi king replaces first in line to the throne with his son, Mohammed bin Salman, the defence chief, state media says.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/06/s ... 07437.html
Mohammed bin Salman, embarked on major overseas visits, including a trip to the White House to meet President Donald Trump in March.
That visit to Washington helped lay the foundation for Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia in May, which marked the president's first overseas visit.
The trip was promoted heavily by the kingdom as proof of its weight in the region and wider Muslim world.
wutang wrote:Rockstar wrote:wutang wrote:
Saudi's one 'military' strength (apart from the foreign mercenaries it hires) is the Islamist terror is funds and arms - no coincidence that ISIS/AL-Qaeda/etc are taking on the Saudi's rivals like Assad, Houthis, Iran, etc.
Sunnis terrorizing Shias like always.
Qatar is next.Mohammed bin Salman named Saudi Arabia's crown prince
Saudi king replaces first in line to the throne with his son, Mohammed bin Salman, the defence chief, state media says.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/06/s ... 07437.html
As defense minister this turd has been in charge of the Saudi war in Yemen - i.e commiting genocide.
He is also very hawkish against Iran ruling out talks and saying he will take the battle to them.... the joke being that Iran would kick the living shit out of the Saudis in a war.
Unless of course the Americans are planning to use it as a pretext to start one with the IraniansMohammed bin Salman, embarked on major overseas visits, including a trip to the White House to meet President Donald Trump in March.
That visit to Washington helped lay the foundation for Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia in May, which marked the president's first overseas visit.
The trip was promoted heavily by the kingdom as proof of its weight in the region and wider Muslim world.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests