NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby wutang » Thu Jun 29, 2017 7:24 pm

16 years and still fighting this pointless war.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/che ... 348fcf1525


Longest war in America's history. Very real chance that in the next couple of years there will be US troops being sent into that place who weren't even born when it started.

With the Taliban in control of broad swaths of the country and the Afghan military locked in a primarily defensive war, it is unclear how a new infusion of NATO or U.S. forces could radically turn the tide of the conflict.


Spoilers alert: it cant
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby wutang » Thu Jun 29, 2017 7:25 pm

Even more fucked up is that ISIS is moving in

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/28/worl ... istan.html



What happens if the only way to stop ISIS in Afghanistan is to fund and arm the Taliban

:kinell:


History as farce :shake head:
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby rollup » Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:36 pm

Still looking for Osama!
User avatar
rollup
 
Posts: 16661
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: Wales and 49.0000° N, 6.0000° E

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby wutang » Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:10 am

This one?

Image
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby Rockstar » Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:52 pm

More fodder for the rich.
User avatar
Rockstar
 
Posts: 13236
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:40 pm

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby rollup » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:57 pm

He's not in this one .......
Attachments
Not in this one.jpg
User avatar
rollup
 
Posts: 16661
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: Wales and 49.0000° N, 6.0000° E

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby rollup » Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:59 pm

This bullshit propaganda one that so many unquestioningly fell for?
Attachments
This one.jpg
User avatar
rollup
 
Posts: 16661
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: Wales and 49.0000° N, 6.0000° E

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby Rockstar » Fri Jun 30, 2017 5:47 pm

rollup wrote:This bullshit propaganda one that so many unquestioningly fell for?



Puts an ant colony to shame. :pmsl:
User avatar
Rockstar
 
Posts: 13236
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:40 pm

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby rollup » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:50 pm

Rockstar wrote:
rollup wrote:This bullshit propaganda one that so many unquestioningly fell for?



Puts an ant colony to shame. :pmsl:

At the time this picture was being used to fool the people the narrative was we know these caves are there because we built them for use against the Russians.
My first thought at the time was ....
there were half a million Russians there with their civilian military inteligence people and satellites overhead and the Yanks built roads for the trucks and heavy machinery. All the sand and cement and steel got past the Russians and all the activity on the surface that would be involved.
Undetected.
Yeah right.
Just more propaganda for the war machine from our corporate press.
The last bullshit about Bin Laden was killing him in a firefight in Pakistan and the miserable failure of the propaganda then with Obama and Clinton acting out a scene worthy of any soap where they watched in shock as it all unfolded live in Washington for them.
If he's dead mission accomplished and the troops can come home yes?
Or was going looking for a guy in a cave just more bullshit for the masses?
User avatar
rollup
 
Posts: 16661
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: Wales and 49.0000° N, 6.0000° E

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby Si_Crewe » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:05 pm

rollup wrote:The last bullshit about Bin Laden was killing him in a firefight in Pakistan and the miserable failure of the propaganda then with Obama and Clinton acting out a scene worthy of any soap where they watched in shock as it all unfolded live in Washington for them.


Never really understood these wacky troofa ideas.

If Bin Laden wasn't dead then all he'd have to do to completely destroy any credibility the USA has on the global stage would be to make a video where he says "Hai guyz! I'z not ded!".

Course, maybe Bin Laden was actually a super-sekrit US agent and they just decided to pension him off and so they told the world he was dead when in reality he's living in a condo' in Miami?
Again, however, that puts the credibility of the world's most powerful country in the hands of a retired actor and relies on nobody actually discovering that he's still alive.

If we're to assume that the USA is devious enough to find some guy and set him up as "the boogyman" just so they could start a bunch of wars and embark on their dastardly plan to reshape the world as they want it, wouldn't they ALSO be devious enough to just fucking KILL that guy once he'd outlived his usefulness?
User avatar
Si_Crewe
 
Posts: 4586
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:33 am

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby Guest » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:21 am

Si_Crewe wrote:
rollup wrote:The last bullshit about Bin Laden was killing him in a firefight in Pakistan and the miserable failure of the propaganda then with Obama and Clinton acting out a scene worthy of any soap where they watched in shock as it all unfolded live in Washington for them.


Never really understood these wacky troofa ideas.

If Bin Laden wasn't dead then all he'd have to do to completely destroy any credibility the USA has on the global stage would be to make a video where he says "Hai guyz! I'z not ded!".

Course, maybe Bin Laden was actually a super-sekrit US agent and they just decided to pension him off and so they told the world he was dead when in reality he's living in a condo' in Miami?
Again, however, that puts the credibility of the world's most powerful country in the hands of a retired actor and relies on nobody actually discovering that he's still alive.

If we're to assume that the USA is devious enough to find some guy and set him up as "the boogyman" just so they could start a bunch of wars and embark on their dastardly plan to reshape the world as they want it, wouldn't they ALSO be devious enough to just fucking KILL that guy once he'd outlived his usefulness?


Wouldn't be the first time... :laughing:

As ever though, Truthers just imagine what they fancy and then think "Yeah, that'll do".
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: NATO to send more troops in Afghanistan

Postby Guest » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:29 am

rollup wrote:This bullshit propaganda one that so many unquestioningly fell for?

Rumsfeld in an interview clip shown in The Power of Nightmares stated Bin Laden had 'several' of these.
User avatar
Guest
 


Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests