How long before this is a headline (assuming no MAD)?
North Korea has produced a miniaturised and missile-ready nuclear warhead, say US analysts
McAz wrote:Sounds as though China may have given their assent to an intervention.
Stooo wrote:McAz wrote:Sounds as though China may have given their assent to an intervention.
Will we be brought back from the brink and our most important leaders lionised as a result?
Holly wrote:Isn't everyone else fed up with this handful of power hungry, narcissistic, psychopaths having the fate of all of us in their hands, and all we can do is sit back and wait and see? It's up to those few dick waving bastards ( Kim Jong-un, Trump, Putin etc ) who decide whether we live or die. What for FFS? So they can get their names into history books? ..are we all just sitting ducks?
These are the most dangerous times the world has been in since the cold war. What will Trump do? What can he do? He can't just deliver empty threats towards NK. Kim Jong has no intentions of stopping his nuclear missile tests, so what's the next move by the US? ...this is all very frightening.
I already keep imagining waking up one morning, turn on the news and find out nuclear war has broken out between the US and NK
Maddog wrote: I'm cool with selling the Japanese a few nukes. It kind of seems only fair.
Maddog wrote:I don't think there is any doubt that N. Korea can launch a nuke. The question is can they figure out where it will land?
US nearly detonated atomic bomb over North Carolina – secret document
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/ ... olina-1961
Remember the Time America Nuked Spain By Accident?
Photographer and historian John Howard went to Palomares to photograph the nuclear disaster you've never heard of.
https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/3bj3 ... -palomares
These events are called "broken arrows". That's the code name when the US government loses or breaks a hydrogen bomb. This guy in John Woo's film Broken Arrow says, "I don't know what's scarier – losing nuclear weapons, or that it's happened so often there's actually a code name for it."
The US admit to 32 of these "broken arrows". Eric Schlosser, an investigative journalist, estimates 100 for the 1950s alone, and for the US Air Force alone, claiming that the navy and army failed to keep track. The template for US defence in the case of a "broken arrow" is to deny, and if people find out, to minimise. This means they forever belittle the event of Palomares in their reports – "tiny little village", "sleepy". Journalists were using these demeaning, trivialising discourses, too. They were shot right through all the narratives.
wutang wrote:Maddog wrote: I'm cool with selling the Japanese a few nukes. It kind of seems only fair.
Im not sure the Japanese would be too comfortable receiving nukes from America... especially after last time
wutang wrote:Maddog wrote:I don't think there is any doubt that N. Korea can launch a nuke. The question is can they figure out where it will land?
They are almost as irresponsible as your Government is with themUS nearly detonated atomic bomb over North Carolina – secret document
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/ ... olina-1961Remember the Time America Nuked Spain By Accident?
Photographer and historian John Howard went to Palomares to photograph the nuclear disaster you've never heard of.
https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/3bj3 ... -palomaresThese events are called "broken arrows". That's the code name when the US government loses or breaks a hydrogen bomb. This guy in John Woo's film Broken Arrow says, "I don't know what's scarier – losing nuclear weapons, or that it's happened so often there's actually a code name for it."
The US admit to 32 of these "broken arrows". Eric Schlosser, an investigative journalist, estimates 100 for the 1950s alone, and for the US Air Force alone, claiming that the navy and army failed to keep track. The template for US defence in the case of a "broken arrow" is to deny, and if people find out, to minimise. This means they forever belittle the event of Palomares in their reports – "tiny little village", "sleepy". Journalists were using these demeaning, trivialising discourses, too. They were shot right through all the narratives.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests