Religious Exemptions

Religious Exemptions

Postby Stooo » Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:48 pm

As a theme park lifts its ban on Sikh ceremonial swords, NSS campaigns director Stephen Evans questions the wisdom behind religious exemptions from generally applicable rules.

The latest submission to religious demands came this week when a popular theme park lifted its ban on Sikh visitors wearing ceremonial swords.

Quite understandably, Drayton Manor theme park has a general policy of not allowing 'weapons' or 'other articles which may cause injury' into the park. Clearly the Kirpan (or ceremonial sword) worn by a small proportion of Sikhs falls foul of this policy.

Following "in-depth consultation" with "Sikh elders", the theme park has backtracked and will now Sikhs to bring in ceremonial daggers provided they are "no more than six inches long". This is despite a report from a renowned health and safety specialist confirming that "the wearing of a sheathed dagger posed a viable compromise to safety whilst on a ride".

So now we have a situation whereby kids' wheelie shoes are banned, but six inch knives are fine ­– provided they're strapped to a Sikh. Welcome to the crazy world of religious privilege.


http://www.secularism.org.uk/blog/2017/ ... exemptions

Health and safety should beat any traditional attire in my view.
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118754
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Red Okktober » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:04 pm

Quite right Stooo, public safety should always come before religious exemptions. I assume you therefore also disagree with veiled muslim women being allowed to walk around anonymously at a time of heightened terrorist attacks? Well said.

Re the sikh swords, I don't think they should be allowed anywhere in public, let alone a theme park. With all those upside -down, spin-around rides - it's bad enough when loose change or a set of keys flies out of someone's pocket.
User avatar
Red Okktober
 
Posts: 6415
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:37 pm

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Stooo » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:13 pm

Red Okktober wrote:Quite right Stooo, public safety should always come before religious exemptions. I assume you therefore also disagree with veiled muslim women being allowed to walk around anonymously at a time of heightened terrorist attacks? Well said.



No I don't, please don't put words into my mouth. Thanks.
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118754
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Red Okktober » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:19 pm

Stooo wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Quite right Stooo, public safety should always come before religious exemptions. I assume you therefore also disagree with veiled muslim women being allowed to walk around anonymously at a time of heightened terrorist attacks? Well said.



No I don't, please don't put words into my mouth. Thanks.


This is what you said:

" Health and safety should beat any traditional attire in my view."

Fuck me, you can hardly deny it. :mrgreen:
User avatar
Red Okktober
 
Posts: 6415
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:37 pm

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Stooo » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:27 pm

Red Okktober wrote:
Stooo wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:Quite right Stooo, public safety should always come before religious exemptions. I assume you therefore also disagree with veiled muslim women being allowed to walk around anonymously at a time of heightened terrorist attacks? Well said.



No I don't, please don't put words into my mouth. Thanks.


This is what you said:

" Health and safety should beat any traditional attire in my view."

Fuck me, you can hardly deny it. :mrgreen:


I can't get stabbed by a fucking cloak... :again?:
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118754
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Red Okktober » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:38 pm

Stooo wrote:I can't get stabbed by a fucking cloak... :again?:


Likewise, a sikh ceremonial sword can't conceal a suicide vest - your point is what exactly?

I get it - you disagree with religious exemptions, as long as your beloved islam isn't affected. Fair enough.
User avatar
Red Okktober
 
Posts: 6415
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:37 pm

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Stooo » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:53 pm

Red Okktober wrote:
Stooo wrote:I can't get stabbed by a fucking cloak... :again?:


Likewise, a sikh ceremonial sword can't conceal a suicide vest - your point is what exactly?

I get it - you disagree with religious exemptions, as long as your beloved islam isn't affected. Fair enough.


I'm a Humanist m8... :ooer:
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118754
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Red Okktober » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:57 pm

Stooo wrote:I'm a Humanist m8... :ooer:


Well done - but what's that got to do with the price of fish?

No offence, but what a fucking dumb thread to start by an islamic apologist.
User avatar
Red Okktober
 
Posts: 6415
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:37 pm

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Stooo » Sat Sep 02, 2017 8:14 pm

Red Okktober wrote:
Stooo wrote:I'm a Humanist m8... :ooer:


Well done - but what's that got to do with the price of fish?

No offence, but what a fucking dumb thread to start by an islamic apologist.


Apologising, how?
User avatar
Stooo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 118754
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Lloyd George » Sun Sep 03, 2017 7:25 am

My religion involves carrying a ceremonial machine gun. :canny:
User avatar
Lloyd George
 

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Conscience » Sun Sep 03, 2017 7:02 pm

Apparently Islam involves carrying a ceremonial suicide vest. :pmsl:
User avatar
Conscience
 

Re: Religious Exemptions

Postby Guest » Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:53 pm

Stooo wrote:
Red Okktober wrote:
Stooo wrote:I'm a Humanist m8... :ooer:


Well done - but what's that got to do with the price of fish?

No offence, but what a fucking dumb thread to start by an islamic apologist.


Apologising, how?


Another tosser who makes a claim and can't back it up.
User avatar
Guest
 


Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests