Boys Haircut

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby Major » Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:53 pm

You are so last year dwarling McAss with YOUR "nig nogz".

BTW, there are far too many in OUR schools, tiz dark at noon in Small Heath.
User avatar
Major
Twat.
 
Posts: 5627
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:08 am

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby Guest » Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:35 pm

Major Starbold wrote:You are so last year dwarling McAss with YOUR "nig nogz".

BTW, there are far too many in OUR schools, tiz dark at noon in Small Heath.


stooo, vicky & holly, can there be a rule posts are done in english? i can't understand 'major' at all.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby McAz » Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:59 pm

Major Starbold wrote:You are so last year dwarling McAss with YOUR "nig nogz".

BTW, there are far too many in OUR schools, tiz dark at noon in Small Heath.



I bow to your superior knowledge of racist fashion trends - what racial insult do you now use for black school children when you're sniffing around school entrances?
User avatar
McAz
 
Posts: 43441
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:57 am

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby Dean » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:07 am

Major Starbold wrote:You are so last year dwarling McAss with YOUR "nig nogz".

BTW, there are far too many in OUR schools, tiz dark at noon in Small Heath.


At least you’ve finally posted your true opinion, instead of insinuations. Nothing but an old racist...
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 47578
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:02 pm

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby Trapper John » Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:52 pm

Stooo wrote:And what is your opinion of a kid showing up with a shaved head?


If it's a case of a drastic nit cure, I'm all for it. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby Mekon » Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:53 pm

Not one person sent their little boys to school in tiaras and high heels. Not one person suggested sending their little boys to school in tiaras and high heels. There is a psychiatric condition called Intermittent Explosive Disorder which includes among its symptoms disproportionate outrage and feeling out of control.
User avatar
Mekon
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:33 pm

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby Cannydc » Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:40 pm

Red Okktober wrote:
Cannydc wrote:The story was never about boys being sent to school in tiaras and high heels....or being in lessons wearing them.

It was about being allowed to dress as they liked DURING PLAY. You know, dressing up, that sort of stuff.

Strange how this has been twisted by elements of the press into yet another 'faux outrage' tale.

Strange, but not surprising.


Wrong, it's part of broader guidelines from the C of E about 'gender identity' 'anti-LGBT bullying' transphobic, 'biphobic' and homophobic behaviour, and other such bollocks, they're trying to bombard tiny children with.

if a son of mine went to a normal school in a tiara or high heels, or even 'played' in them, I'd fully expect him to come home with a fat lip and black eye.

http://www.itv.com/news/2017-11-13/chur ... -identify/



FROM YOUR LINK....

"Pupils need to be able to play with the many cloaks of identity (sometimes quite literally with the dressing up box).

So who was wrong again ????
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 21432
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby Major » Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:47 pm

Guest wrote:
Major Starbold wrote:You are so last year dwarling McAss with YOUR "nig nogz".

BTW, there are far too many in OUR schools, tiz dark at noon in Small Heath.


stooo, vicky & holly, can there be a rule posts are done in english? i can't understand 'major' at all.


YOU need to grasp GRAMMAR using capitul lettuz .

Yoo doo undastand wot I rite, yoo wine lyke a yung lass abowt me oftun enuff.

How a coward with a yellow streak mile long has the audacity to tell management how to run their forum beats me.

Ya cannot take the truth as you are one of them who is ruining my island.
User avatar
Major
Twat.
 
Posts: 5627
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:08 am

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby Red Okktober » Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:47 pm

Cannydc wrote:[

FROM YOUR LINK....

"Pupils need to be able to play with the many cloaks of identity (sometimes quite literally with the dressing up box).

So who was wrong again ????


Why are you trying to split hairs over this canny? The C of E have issued guidelines directed at little children, involving things that shouldn't concern them at that age, such as transphobia, and 'biphobia' whatever the fuck that is. Do you think it's all to do with 'playing'? it would appear to be far more sinister than that.

I'm not sure how daft you actually are, but my guess is 'very' - you already told us you want the different races to become extinct, and that you want open borders. You have now highlighted, bolded, and increased in size, the word 'sometimes'. The C of E are saying that little children should be allowed to cross dress without repercussions, and that sometimes, but not exclusively so, that involves the 'dressing up box'.

Something you didn't highlight - 'the many cloaks of identity '' - what do you think that means, is that to do with playing as well? Maybe Zorro. Batman, or Transgender Man/Woman perhaps?

I can assure you the C of E are deadly serious about this, and are not referring exclusively to children's games.
User avatar
Red Okktober
 
Posts: 6414
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:37 pm

Re: Boys Haircut

Postby Big Fat Frosty » Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:57 pm

Red Okktober wrote:
I can assure you the C of E are deadly serious about this, and are not referring exclusively to children's games.

fuck the church of england
fuck the jews and the catholics and proddys and the muslims
and the fucking hindus too
:thumbsup:
stop mutilating children's genitals
and cut your hair however the fuck you want
:thumbsup:
User avatar
Big Fat Frosty
 
Posts: 17365
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 3:51 pm

Previous

Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests