Page 1 of 7

Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:27 am
by Vicks
Image

Jon Venables who was one of the sadistic murderers of toddler James Bulger, has been thrown back in prison.

Venables has once again been caught with child porn.

Venables along with his accomplice Robert Thompson were both freed in 2001 after serving only eight years for the horrific crime.

Venables was jailed again in 2010 for possessing indecent images of children.

Since his release, he's been given four new identities at a cost of £250,000 each time to the taxpayer.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/nov/23/james-bulger-killer-jon-venables-back-in-jail-after-being-caught-with-abuse-images-again

Is it not about time the key was thrown away on this 35 year old man, who is clearly a serious danger to children?

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:31 am
by Vicks
Oh and i think it's disgusting that this murderer and pervert is still being protected by the law.

We should know what he looks like and what name, he has at the moment.

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:34 am
by Vicks
Oh and as part of his release, he was told never to return to Liverpool.

However he's visited Liverpool on at least four occasions.

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:49 am
by Guest
THROW AWAY THE KEY

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:53 am
by Vicks
Guest wrote:THROW AWAY THE KEY


Aye the next time he leaves prison, should be in a pine box.

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:57 am
by Guest
always been a bit of a posterboy for the liberals this scumbag. They like to try and out do one another to see who can be the most compassionate to the child murderer and the most sneery at those who would happily see him choke. To the liberal left the abused children in the pictures he likes to save on his hard drive are mere collateral damage (something we should just tolerate in their lofty quest to 'rehabilitate' scum) in their quest to try and show how tolerant and compassionate they can be to child murderers.

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:06 am
by Vicks

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 11:18 am
by Cannydc
"They (liberals, naturally) like to try and out do one another to see who can be the most compassionate to the child murderer and the most sneery at those who would happily see him choke."

Really ?

I have never met one of these 'liberals' espousing such compassion to a murderer. However I, like many others, show an interest in what kind of upbringing two ten year old kids had, which gave them such a lack of moral compass allowing them to do such a thing.

The idea then, once understood, may be used for future prevention. Some good could come from such a horrendous crime.

But I suppose such an idea would never enter the heads of the 'string-em-up brigade, would it ?

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 11:54 am
by Guest
Cannydc wrote:"They (liberals, naturally) like to try and out do one another to see who can be the most compassionate to the child murderer and the most sneery at those who would happily see him choke."

Really ?

I have never met one of these 'liberals' espousing such compassion to a murderer. However I, like many others, show an interest in what kind of upbringing two ten year old kids had, which gave them such a lack of moral compass allowing them to do such a thing.

The idea then, once understood, may be used for future prevention. Some good could come from such a horrendous crime.

But I suppose such an idea would never enter the heads of the 'string-em-up brigade, would it ?


sneering? tick. Attempting to out do other liberals with compassion for child murderers? tick. My point proven by your very response? tick

How is that understanding going? he is what 35 now and still offending against kids. How much longer do you sneering liberals suggest we allow our children to be put at risk for so you can finish your 'understanding'?

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:00 pm
by Rolluplostinspace
Guest wrote:
Cannydc wrote:"They (liberals, naturally) like to try and out do one another to see who can be the most compassionate to the child murderer and the most sneery at those who would happily see him choke."

Really ?

I have never met one of these 'liberals' espousing such compassion to a murderer. However I, like many others, show an interest in what kind of upbringing two ten year old kids had, which gave them such a lack of moral compass allowing them to do such a thing.

The idea then, once understood, may be used for future prevention. Some good could come from such a horrendous crime.

But I suppose such an idea would never enter the heads of the 'string-em-up brigade, would it ?


sneering? tick. Attempting to out do other liberals with compassion for child murderers? tick. My point proven by your very response? tick

How is that understanding going? he is what 35 now and still offending against kids. How much longer do you sneering liberals suggest we allow our children to be put at risk for so you can finish your 'understanding'?
You must be flush with loads of links to these liberals.

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:03 pm
by Lambert
Cannydc wrote:However I, like many others, show an interest in what kind of upbringing two ten year old kids had, which gave them such a lack of moral compass allowing them to do such a thing.

The idea then, once understood, may be used for future prevention. Some good could come from such a horrendous crime.


You are assuming that upbringing is a significant factor in the actions of such people. It may be for some, but certainly not all. Ted Bundy had a normal childhood in terms of how he was treated by his family. Psychopaths are born, but they don't always become criminals.

Even if it were always true that an abusive upbringing would cause a young psychopath to become a killer in his or her later years, what could we do about it? Abuse is almost always hidden.

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:18 pm
by Lady Murasaki
Lambert wrote:
Cannydc wrote:However I, like many others, show an interest in what kind of upbringing two ten year old kids had, which gave them such a lack of moral compass allowing them to do such a thing.

The idea then, once understood, may be used for future prevention. Some good could come from such a horrendous crime.


You are assuming that upbringing is a significant factor in the actions of such people. It may be for some, but certainly not all. Ted Bundy had a normal childhood in terms of how he was treated by his family. Psychopaths are born, but they don't always become criminals.

Even if it were always true that an abusive upbringing would cause a young psychopath to become a killer in his or her later years, what could we do about it? Abuse is almost always hidden.


Deprogramme them? Is that possible with therapy?
Don't some paedophiles opt to be chemically castrated?

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:22 pm
by wutang
Cannydc wrote:"They (liberals, naturally) like to try and out do one another to see who can be the most compassionate to the child murderer and the most sneery at those who would happily see him choke."

Really ?

I have never met one of these 'liberals' espousing such compassion to a murderer. However I, like many others, show an interest in what kind of upbringing two ten year old kids had, which gave them such a lack of moral compass allowing them to do such a thing.

The idea then, once understood, may be used for future prevention. Some good could come from such a horrendous crime.

But I suppose such an idea would never enter the heads of the 'string-em-up brigade, would it ?



The irony is that it is the string-em-up brigade who were demanding that 2 ten year olds be killed in reponse to this crime.

Nothing demonstrates an opposition to child killing like demanding children be killed.

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:54 pm
by Lambert
Lady Murasaki wrote:
Lambert wrote:
Cannydc wrote:However I, like many others, show an interest in what kind of upbringing two ten year old kids had, which gave them such a lack of moral compass allowing them to do such a thing.

The idea then, once understood, may be used for future prevention. Some good could come from such a horrendous crime.


You are assuming that upbringing is a significant factor in the actions of such people. It may be for some, but certainly not all. Ted Bundy had a normal childhood in terms of how he was treated by his family. Psychopaths are born, but they don't always become criminals.

Even if it were always true that an abusive upbringing would cause a young psychopath to become a killer in his or her later years, what could we do about it? Abuse is almost always hidden.


Deprogramme them? Is that possible with therapy?
Don't some paedophiles opt to be chemically castrated?


There is no 'cure' for psychopathy. The brains of people with psychopathic treats exhibit different levels of activity in key areas when compared with the controls. It's essentially hard wired. Therapy might help with minimising criminal behaviour, but the impulsiveness combined with lack of remorse make this a challenge. Psychopaths are far more likely to re-offend upon release from prison.

Re: Jon Venables.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:59 pm
by Trapper John
Very emotive subject this.

I do wonder though how long anonimity should last? 35 years and several attempts at it shows it's not working here, mainly because the person enjoying it doesn't appear to find it worthwhile or necessary.

This bloke has been flawed since childhood, probably since birth I don't see that ever changing. If you weigh up the costs of keeping him in prison and do likewise with letting him out, what options are you left with?