Markey mark wrote:The liberals love to defend people like John venables marjor , they probably blame his parents or the day his hamster died , the real truth he a monster and won’t stop at nothing in harming the vulnerable, the people who stand up for child killers are as sick in the head too,
Let's analyse the above fallacy by fallacy.
We'll start with the use of a false syllogism - The liberals - a large group that cannot be defined or delimited. The supposed group is therefore defined solely within the delusion of the proposer and can be given any attribute. The liberals is meaningless as a definition except as a grab bag into which all subsequent fallacies can be grouped.
Having created a fictitious group the proposer then attributes and action - in this case defending Jon Venables - something that nobody outside of the proposer's imagination, and therefore only the proposer himself, has done.
Having offered a defence of Jon Venables the proposer further imagines a justification he feels would mitigate Jon Venables crimes, that garbage about a hamster dying is a smoke screen to cover the proposers real message - he feels Jon Venables parents are to blame for the murder of Jamie Bulger.
So we have a person who blames Jon Venables parents for actions in which they had no part in - nor is this the first time that a conservative has proposed blaming Jon Venables mother for his crimes. The Daily Mail probed Venables family life and found that he was the fifth of seven children whose mother was an alcoholic and whose father had deserted him two years before. However much as the Markey - the actual proposer under the guise of a false syllogism - might propose this the fact is that many other people have come from as difficult or more challenging backgrounds without resorting to murdering an infant. Like the conservatives of many years ago Markey is wide of the mark - although at least conservatives have sufficient shame to try to attribute their views to someone else this time.
Which is not to say that there weren't instances in Jon Venables past where warning signs were not in evidence hence the need for Markey to absolve those who have learned nothing from the crime. If Jon Venables was 'always' going to be a murderer then the next Jon Venables is equally inevitable and support for single parent families struggling on low incomes isn't going to help the situation. Here we come across the reason why Markey has created the fictitious 'defenders' of Jon Venables, in fact a small voice of conscience within himself that says the next 'Jamie Bulger' will be in part on his hands because his belief that attempts to mitigate the psychological damage done to the victims of deprivation are not sincerely held, they are a cover for a selfish desire to have more for himself at the expense of others.
So what appears to be an attack on 'The Liberals' is actually a confession of guilt from Markey and those he perceives share his retrograde and medieval views.
Confession accepted Markey.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:09 pm
