Katie Rough Murder.

Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Vicky » Fri Nov 24, 2017 4:20 pm

3D27DCC800000578-4219486-image-a-1_1487010858866.jpg


The fifteen year old girl who murdered seven year old Katie Rough at the beginning of the year, has been jailed for life.

Well to be precise, she's been jailed for a minimum of five years.

So that's what the courts have decided is an adequate punishment for slashing this week girls neck with a Stanley Knife.

Of course the girl who is now sixteen, can't be identified for legal reasons.

However most people know who she is, which makes it even worse, because Katie would have trusted her.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-42112979
User avatar
Vicky
 
Posts: 68337
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:26 pm

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Cannydc » Fri Nov 24, 2017 4:39 pm

Seems to be a particular habit on forums, failing to accurately record sentences and then claiming that they are unduly lenient.

A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.

The reality is that she is likely to remain inside for a lot longer. Probation is never given lightly in these circumstances.
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 21432
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Vicky » Fri Nov 24, 2017 4:48 pm

Cannydc wrote:Seems to be a particular habit on forums, failing to accurately record sentences and then claiming that they are unduly lenient.

A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.

The reality is that she is likely to remain inside for a lot longer. Probation is never given lightly in these circumstances.


Thank God for you Canny, keeping all us morons right.

I am aware of how things work.

Thank you.
User avatar
Vicky
 
Posts: 68337
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:26 pm

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby jp761 » Fri Nov 24, 2017 4:51 pm

Vicky wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Seems to be a particular habit on forums, failing to accurately record sentences and then claiming that they are unduly lenient.

A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.

The reality is that she is likely to remain inside for a lot longer. Probation is never given lightly in these circumstances.


Thank God for you Canny, keeping all us morons right.

I am aware of how things work.

Thank you.
Yeah I read that and thought.. YOU DON'T SAY!
User avatar
jp761
 
Posts: 7966
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Vicky » Fri Nov 24, 2017 5:35 pm

jp761 wrote:
Vicky wrote:
Cannydc wrote:Seems to be a particular habit on forums, failing to accurately record sentences and then claiming that they are unduly lenient.

A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.

The reality is that she is likely to remain inside for a lot longer. Probation is never given lightly in these circumstances.


Thank God for you Canny, keeping all us morons right.

I am aware of how things work.

Thank you.
Yeah I read that and thought.. YOU DON'T SAY!


I don't like being treated as if i'm a doughball.
User avatar
Vicky
 
Posts: 68337
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:26 pm

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby wutang » Fri Nov 24, 2017 5:47 pm

Cannydc wrote:A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.



Yeah Charles Manson was able to apply for parole just 7 years into his sentence (and that was for 9 murders) He still ended up doing 46 years.
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Guest » Fri Nov 24, 2017 6:01 pm

Why set the minimal so low, it means that in five years for now Katie's parents will have to go through it all again and then put forward their reasons why she should remain inside
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby wutang » Fri Nov 24, 2017 6:48 pm

Guest wrote:Why set the minimal so low, it means that in five years for now Katie's parents will have to go through it all again and then put forward their reasons why she should remain inside


Maybe because she was convicted of manslaughter by diminished responsibility not murder :dunno:
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby wutang » Fri Nov 24, 2017 6:53 pm

The bigger question is why wasn't this girl getting treatment?

The court heard a full psychiatric assessment had been requested for the teenager, and the possibility of psychosis was flagged a month before the killing yet no investigation was carried out. A friend told investigators the teenager self-harmed and liked to talk about death, and that she had said she dreamed of killing someone and heard voices in her head.

Two days before she killed Katie, she had posted a picture to Instagram of self-harm wounds to her arms made with pencil sharpener blades captioned: “Mentally, seriously, not OK”. She was “clearly crying out for help and support”, the teenager’s defence barrister, Nicholas Johnson QC, said at the time.

He said his client had been telling people of “delusional and bizarre thoughts” for many months before the killing, including the “genuine belief in her head that her family and many others were not human and may be controlled by a higher and hostile force”.



The lack of treatment facilities availabe due to underfunding of mental health care in this country is a fucking scandal :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall:
User avatar
wutang
 
Posts: 6269
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:02 am
Location: Globalist Department, Frankfurt School

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Cannydc » Fri Nov 24, 2017 6:59 pm

wutang wrote:
Guest wrote:Why set the minimal so low, it means that in five years for now Katie's parents will have to go through it all again and then put forward their reasons why she should remain inside


Maybe because she was convicted of manslaughter by diminished responsibility not murder :dunno:


Maybe.

Perhaps the OP missed that small detail too.
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 21432
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Guest » Fri Nov 24, 2017 7:32 pm

wutang wrote:
Guest wrote:Why set the minimal so low, it means that in five years for now Katie's parents will have to go through it all again and then put forward their reasons why she should remain inside


Maybe because she was convicted of manslaughter by diminished responsibility not murder :dunno:


Nobody will label a child a psychopath but going by your post above this girl certainly has ASPD
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Bella » Sat Nov 25, 2017 12:19 am

wutang wrote:The bigger question is why wasn't this girl getting treatment?

The court heard a full psychiatric assessment had been requested for the teenager, and the possibility of psychosis was flagged a month before the killing yet no investigation was carried out. A friend told investigators the teenager self-harmed and liked to talk about death, and that she had said she dreamed of killing someone and heard voices in her head.

Two days before she killed Katie, she had posted a picture to Instagram of self-harm wounds to her arms made with pencil sharpener blades captioned: “Mentally, seriously, not OK”. She was “clearly crying out for help and support”, the teenager’s defence barrister, Nicholas Johnson QC, said at the time.

He said his client had been telling people of “delusional and bizarre thoughts” for many months before the killing, including the “genuine belief in her head that her family and many others were not human and may be controlled by a higher and hostile force”.



The lack of treatment facilities availabe due to underfunding of mental health care in this country is a fucking scandal :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall:


Yes, poor family losing losing two girls in dreadful circumstances.
User avatar
Bella
 
Posts: 7638
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:04 pm

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Bella » Sat Nov 25, 2017 12:38 am

Vicky wrote:
3D27DCC800000578-4219486-image-a-1_1487010858866.jpg


The fifteen year old girl who murdered seven year old Katie Rough at the beginning of the year, has been jailed for life.

Well to be precise, she's been jailed for a minimum of five years.

So that's what the courts have decided is an adequate punishment for slashing this week girls neck with a Stanley Knife.

Of course the girl who is now sixteen, can't be identified for legal reasons.

However most people know who she is, which makes it even worse, because Katie would have trusted her.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-42112979


The girl who murdered her is mentally ill and psychotic, yes we know who she .
User avatar
Bella
 
Posts: 7638
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:04 pm

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Vicky » Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:35 am

Bella wrote:
Vicky wrote:
The fifteen year old girl who murdered seven year old Katie Rough at the beginning of the year, has been jailed for life.

Well to be precise, she's been jailed for a minimum of five years.

So that's what the courts have decided is an adequate punishment for slashing this week girls neck with a Stanley Knife.

Of course the girl who is now sixteen, can't be identified for legal reasons.

However most people know who she is, which makes it even worse, because Katie would have trusted her.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-42112979


The girl who murdered her is mentally ill and psychotic, yes we know who she .


I already know that, so patronise someone else.

Oh i suggest you say "I" not "We" you ain't the Queen.

:thumbsup:
User avatar
Vicky
 
Posts: 68337
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:26 pm

Re: Katie Rough Murder.

Postby Puzzler » Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:17 am

Cannydc wrote:Seems to be a particular habit on forums, failing to accurately record sentences and then claiming that they are unduly lenient.

A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.

The reality is that she is likely to remain inside for a lot longer. Probation is never given lightly in these circumstances.

Cunt. 5 years minimum for slaughtering a little girl and you think that’s appropriate in any universe? It should have been fucking 50 whether she spends it in prison or fucking broadmoor.
User avatar
Puzzler
 
Posts: 7172
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:07 pm
Location: A brave new world


Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests

cron