Cannydc wrote:Seems to be a particular habit on forums, failing to accurately record sentences and then claiming that they are unduly lenient.
A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.
The reality is that she is likely to remain inside for a lot longer. Probation is never given lightly in these circumstances.
Yeah I read that and thought.. YOU DON'T SAY!Vicky wrote:Cannydc wrote:Seems to be a particular habit on forums, failing to accurately record sentences and then claiming that they are unduly lenient.
A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.
The reality is that she is likely to remain inside for a lot longer. Probation is never given lightly in these circumstances.
Thank God for you Canny, keeping all us morons right.
I am aware of how things work.
Thank you.
jp761 wrote:Yeah I read that and thought.. YOU DON'T SAY!Vicky wrote:Cannydc wrote:Seems to be a particular habit on forums, failing to accurately record sentences and then claiming that they are unduly lenient.
A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.
The reality is that she is likely to remain inside for a lot longer. Probation is never given lightly in these circumstances.
Thank God for you Canny, keeping all us morons right.
I am aware of how things work.
Thank you.
Cannydc wrote:A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.
Guest wrote:Why set the minimal so low, it means that in five years for now Katie's parents will have to go through it all again and then put forward their reasons why she should remain inside
The court heard a full psychiatric assessment had been requested for the teenager, and the possibility of psychosis was flagged a month before the killing yet no investigation was carried out. A friend told investigators the teenager self-harmed and liked to talk about death, and that she had said she dreamed of killing someone and heard voices in her head.
Two days before she killed Katie, she had posted a picture to Instagram of self-harm wounds to her arms made with pencil sharpener blades captioned: “Mentally, seriously, not OK”. She was “clearly crying out for help and support”, the teenager’s defence barrister, Nicholas Johnson QC, said at the time.
He said his client had been telling people of “delusional and bizarre thoughts” for many months before the killing, including the “genuine belief in her head that her family and many others were not human and may be controlled by a higher and hostile force”.
wutang wrote:Guest wrote:Why set the minimal so low, it means that in five years for now Katie's parents will have to go through it all again and then put forward their reasons why she should remain inside
Maybe because she was convicted of manslaughter by diminished responsibility not murder
wutang wrote:Guest wrote:Why set the minimal so low, it means that in five years for now Katie's parents will have to go through it all again and then put forward their reasons why she should remain inside
Maybe because she was convicted of manslaughter by diminished responsibility not murder
wutang wrote:The bigger question is why wasn't this girl getting treatment?The court heard a full psychiatric assessment had been requested for the teenager, and the possibility of psychosis was flagged a month before the killing yet no investigation was carried out. A friend told investigators the teenager self-harmed and liked to talk about death, and that she had said she dreamed of killing someone and heard voices in her head.
Two days before she killed Katie, she had posted a picture to Instagram of self-harm wounds to her arms made with pencil sharpener blades captioned: “Mentally, seriously, not OK”. She was “clearly crying out for help and support”, the teenager’s defence barrister, Nicholas Johnson QC, said at the time.
He said his client had been telling people of “delusional and bizarre thoughts” for many months before the killing, including the “genuine belief in her head that her family and many others were not human and may be controlled by a higher and hostile force”.
The lack of treatment facilities availabe due to underfunding of mental health care in this country is a fucking scandal
Vicky wrote:
The fifteen year old girl who murdered seven year old Katie Rough at the beginning of the year, has been jailed for life.
Well to be precise, she's been jailed for a minimum of five years.
So that's what the courts have decided is an adequate punishment for slashing this week girls neck with a Stanley Knife.
Of course the girl who is now sixteen, can't be identified for legal reasons.
However most people know who she is, which makes it even worse, because Katie would have trusted her.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-42112979
Bella wrote:Vicky wrote:
The fifteen year old girl who murdered seven year old Katie Rough at the beginning of the year, has been jailed for life.
Well to be precise, she's been jailed for a minimum of five years.
So that's what the courts have decided is an adequate punishment for slashing this week girls neck with a Stanley Knife.
Of course the girl who is now sixteen, can't be identified for legal reasons.
However most people know who she is, which makes it even worse, because Katie would have trusted her.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-42112979
The girl who murdered her is mentally ill and psychotic, yes we know who she .
Cannydc wrote:Seems to be a particular habit on forums, failing to accurately record sentences and then claiming that they are unduly lenient.
A life sentence can be just that, and by setting a minimum term the judge ensures that she will not even be able to apply for probation for 5 years, never mind get it approved.
The reality is that she is likely to remain inside for a lot longer. Probation is never given lightly in these circumstances.
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests