Buzzfeed doubles planned redundancies

[Viper]

Leftie snowflake mouthpiece buzzfeed is in big trouble losses of 3.5m and having to sack a third of their UK workforce.

Hows that pishy stop funding hate campaign working out?

[Viper]

Linkypoos

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.busi ... nt-2017-12

[Rolluplostinspace]

Wealthy Tories destroy world economy.

[Cannydc]

Never heard of them.

Sorry if some families are having their Christmas ruined though. Hardly something to celebrate, a bit like saying you're glad a BA plane crashed because they once cancelled your flight.

[Fletch]

Buzzfeed signed their own death warrant by airing the peepee dossier as if it was truth.

[wutang]

December 2016

NUJ demands union recognition for BuzzFeed's UK editorial staff

Let’s talk ‘before you make any irreversible decisions’, says BuzzFeed chief executive Jonah Peretti in an email to employees

December 2017

23 journalists facing redundancy at Buzzfeed UK as NUJ says cuts are 'chilling' for news industry

"Press Gazette understands that despite having taken the first steps towards forming an NUJ chapel, UK staff are still in the process of gaining union recognition from Buzzfeed."


What a big coincidence

[wutang]

Coming soon:

23 unpaid intern positions at Buzzfeed UK. Learn the joys of being a Journalist without any of the benefits (like pay or union rights)

[Stooo]

Buzzfeed signed their own death warrant by airing the peepee dossier.

Fixed that for you...

[Guest]

Leftie snowflake mouthpiece buzzfeed is in big trouble losses of 3.5m and having to sack a third of their UK workforce.

Hows that pishy stop funding hate campaign working out?

Typical fucking Tory gloating at people losing their jobs

[Lambert]

Buzzfeed has always been trash. Virtually no-one will care if it goes under.

[Viper]

Leftie snowflake mouthpiece buzzfeed is in big trouble losses of 3.5m and having to sack a third of their UK workforce.

Hows that pishy stop funding hate campaign working out?

Typical fucking Tory gloating at people losing their jobs

Lol. See my signature confused one. Then please read aboyt unemployment rates under labour governments and tory governments.

You will realise what a silly boy you are.

[Cannydc]

Do you realise what your signature actually says ???

Bear in mind that intelligence is NOT the same as IQ, so it actually reads that we should have consideration for their (Conservatives) lower IQ when conversing with them.



Conservatives voters are more intelligent than labour voters (scientific fact). Have consideration for their lower IQ when conversing with them.

[Guest]

Do you realise what your signature actually says ???

Bear in mind that intelligence is NOT the same as IQ, so it actually reads that we should have consideration for their (Conservatives) lower IQ when conversing with them.



Conservatives voters are more intelligent than labour voters (scientific fact). Have consideration for their lower IQ when conversing with them.

Bugger, I was about to reply to Viper's attempted slight against me, but you beat me to it - that's exactly what I was going to say
It's quite an ambiguous sentence, isn't it? When I learned English grammar, we were taught that when comparing a number of items in separate clauses or sentences, the correct method is to compare 2A to 1A, 2B to 2B, 2c to 2C etc. As you point out, Viper's sig actually implies that it's the Conservatives who are less intelligent, Isn't it jolly decent of him to (unknowingly) prove it - as he'd say himself - scientific fact.

[Guest]

Do you realise what your signature actually says ???

Bear in mind that intelligence is NOT the same as IQ, so it actually reads that we should have consideration for their (Conservatives) lower IQ when conversing with them.



Conservatives voters are more intelligent than labour voters (scientific fact). Have consideration for their lower IQ when conversing with them.

Bugger, I was about to reply to Viper's attempted slight against me, but you beat me to it - that's exactly what I was going to say
It's quite an ambiguous sentence, isn't it? When I learned English grammar, we were taught that when comparing a number of items in separate clauses or sentences, the correct method is to compare 2A to 1A, 2B to 2B, 2c to 2C etc. As you point out, Viper's sig actually implies that it's the Conservatives who are less intelligent, Isn't it jolly decent of him to (unknowingly) prove it - as he'd say himself - scientific fact.

That should of course have read 2B to 1B, 2C to 1C etc

[Viper]

Do you realise what your signature actually says ???

Bear in mind that intelligence is NOT the same as IQ, so it actually reads that we should have consideration for their (Conservatives) lower IQ when conversing with them.



Conservatives voters are more intelligent than labour voters (scientific fact). Have consideration for their lower IQ when conversing with them.

Bugger, I was about to reply to Viper's attempted slight against me, but you beat me to it - that's exactly what I was going to say
It's quite an ambiguous sentence, isn't it? When I learned English grammar, we were taught that when comparing a number of items in separate clauses or sentences, the correct method is to compare 2A to 1A, 2B to 2B, 2c to 2C etc. As you point out, Viper's sig actually implies that it's the Conservatives who are less intelligent, Isn't it jolly decent of him to (unknowingly) prove it - as he'd say himself - scientific fact.

That should of course have read 2B to 1B, 2C to 1C etc

I wouldnt worry. No one read it