One For The Man-Haters & Feminazi's

One For The Man-Haters & Feminazi's

Postby Trapper John » Sat Dec 16, 2017 9:58 am

This should send a chill down the spine of every man who reads it.

In short, student Liam Allan was accused of raping a girl and went through two years of hell despite police being in possession of evidence which corroborated his claims that the sex was consensual and the girl made the claims out of spite after he broke off the relationship.

Had he been found guilty he could have spent 15 years in prison and on the sex offenders register for life.

Full Story: https://www.retarded.com/uk/413294-sex-rape-trial-evidence/ there are plenty of other sources.

The police officer in charge of the investigation is being used as the scapegoat in this case, being accused of failing in his duty to review all available evidence. Of course those of us who use our eyes and ears every day know the real reason as to why this evidence was withheld, the feminazi driven and liberal elite enacted purge against men and the statistics driven policing used to validate it.

As the following statement shows:

Despite Allan’s innocence being proven, the woman cannot be named because of her right to anonymity under the Sexual Offences Act. The act has been heavily disputed after a number of rape trials fell through where police were accused of “airbrushing” evidence.


How many more men are sitting behind bars now with the prospect of being on the sex offenders list for the rest of their lives, because the police are trying to rid themselves of claims by feminazi groups and politically correct liberals, that they don't take rape accusations seriously ?
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

Re: One For The Man-Haters & Feminazi's

Postby Cannydc » Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:03 am

What ?

The police chose to ignore the FACT that she suggested MORE SEX via text messages, as well as the idea of SIMULATED RAPE as a turn-on....and you blame 'feminazis' ??

Blimey.
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 21432
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: One For The Man-Haters & Feminazi's

Postby Trapper John » Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:27 am

Cannydc wrote:What ?

The police chose to ignore the FACT that she suggested MORE SEX via text messages, as well as the idea of SIMULATED RAPE as a turn-on....and you blame 'feminazis' ??

Blimey.


I blame feminazi's and their liberal enablers for creating the conditions which bring cases like this about. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

Re: One For The Man-Haters & Feminazi's

Postby Cannydc » Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:34 am

But there was an accusation.

And therefore a case for investigation.

And if the police had done their jobs properly, once her texts came to light, that's where the case against him should have ended.

It was entirely up to them.
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 21432
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: One For The Man-Haters & Feminazi's

Postby Viper » Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:44 am

User avatar
Viper
 
Posts: 6978
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 6:32 pm

Re: One For The Man-Haters & Feminazi's

Postby Cannydc » Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:49 am

Willfully ignoring evidence is not unconscious bias.

It is failing in one's duty.
User avatar
Cannydc
 
Posts: 21432
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: One For The Man-Haters & Feminazi's

Postby Trapper John » Sat Dec 16, 2017 11:05 am

Of course this brings another issue to the table too:

The woman cannot be named because of her right to anonymity under the Sexual Offences Act.


In a society driven by Liberal enablers and their acolytes, many of whom want men to be named and shamed so women can be warned of anything they consider is a danger or detriment to them like wolf whistling or unwanted eye winking, it is strangely silent when the boot is on the other foot.

I don't see many liberal enablers or feminazis lobbying MP's or getting in the ears of their influential friends in government demanding that women who make these false accusations are named and shamed so the next man can be warned that if he so much as buys her a drink, he's likely to be sitting in a cell before the night is out, accused of her rape.
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018

Re: One For The Man-Haters & Feminazi's

Postby Trapper John » Sat Dec 16, 2017 11:18 am

Cannydc wrote:Willfully ignoring evidence is not unconscious bias.

It is failing in one's duty.


It is both, the reason for failing to do the job properly is partly due to the fact that the Police have a bias toward getting successful prosecution of rape cases brought about by years of accusations that they don't treat rape seriously.

This copper might have thought 'damn I haven't checked out those phone records, nevermind it will cost some significant overtime if I do and well we want as many rapes as possible prosecuted anyway, does the stats good and proves we are doing our job'

They've done exactly the same with homphobia and race accusations, it's a liberal driven campaign to get our police forces to become more PC and the major reason behind why the police never acted in Rotherham and Rochdale.
User avatar
Trapper John
Gunner.
 
Posts: 35974
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Champions league next season - prediction date: 10/5/2018


Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests