Trouble in Iran. Appeasing their nuclear program was always wrong thing to do by a weak US president.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5250074/i ... -violence/
Stooo wrote:Stopped?
Whatever the cost?
What has Iran done?
Stooo wrote:Stopped?
Whatever the cost?
What has Iran done?
Viper wrote:Stooo wrote:Stopped?
Whatever the cost?
What has Iran done?
Been dicks.
Major wrote:Iran already has a conventional weapons capability to hit U.S. and allied troops stationed in the Middle East and parts of Europe. If Tehran were allowed to develop nuclear weapons, this threat would increase dramatically.
Major wrote:Iran already has a conventional weapons capability to hit U.S. and allied troops stationed in the Middle East and parts of Europe. If Tehran were allowed to develop nuclear weapons, this threat would increase dramatically.
Fletch wrote:Rolluplostinspace wrote:It's kicking off in Iran too now.
How long before we're told the leaders are killing their own people we must go and save them and bring them freedom.
Been a long time coming this one.
Yep, seen that. Soros type protests which will turn in to killing their own people. US is behind it, as usual.
US State Department Hints At Iran Overthrow: Are We Witnessing The Early Stages Of Regime Change?
The US State Department has issued a formal condemnation of the Iranian government following two days of economic protests centering in a handful of cities, calling the regime "a rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed, and chaos" while announcing support for protesters. It fits a familiar script which seems to roll out when anyone protests for any reason in a country considered an enemy of the United States (whether over economic grievances or full on calling for government overthrow).
Google.com/2017-12- ... ges-regime
and a detailed look at it here:
Iran - Regime Change Agents Hijack Economic Protests
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2017/12/ir ... .html#more
Major wrote:Iran already has a conventional weapons capability to hit U.S. and allied troops stationed in the Middle East and parts of Europe. If Tehran were allowed to develop nuclear weapons, this threat would increase dramatically.
Viper wrote:Stooo wrote:Stopped?
Whatever the cost?
What has Iran done?
Been dicks.
McAz wrote:Major wrote:Iran already has a conventional weapons capability to hit U.S. and allied troops stationed in the Middle East and parts of Europe. If Tehran were allowed to develop nuclear weapons, this threat would increase dramatically.
So have many nations, so what starbold?
Major wrote:McAz wrote:Major wrote:Iran already has a conventional weapons capability to hit U.S. and allied troops stationed in the Middle East and parts of Europe. If Tehran were allowed to develop nuclear weapons, this threat would increase dramatically.
So have many nations, so what starbold?
My name is Major USE IT trudy boy.
Fletch wrote:Major wrote:Iran already has a conventional weapons capability to hit U.S. and allied troops stationed in the Middle East and parts of Europe. If Tehran were allowed to develop nuclear weapons, this threat would increase dramatically.
And?
US has enough nuclear weapons and conventional firepower to reduce the world to rubble several times over. Should the US be sanctioned and stopped from producing more?
Return to News, Politics And Current Affairs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests