Iran protests

[Fletch]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

[Rolluplostinspace]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy
Russia went even further, bringing up America’s own behavior and treatment of protesters as a counter-argument to the notion that Washington is motivated by human rights concerns in Iran.

“By your logic, we should have initiated a Security Council meeting after the well-known events in Ferguson,” said Russian U.N. Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya, addressing the U.S. delegation.

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

[Rolluplostinspace]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy
Russia went even further, bringing up America’s own behavior and treatment of protesters as a counter-argument to the notion that Washington is motivated by human rights concerns in Iran.

“By your logic, we should have initiated a Security Council meeting after the well-known events in Ferguson,” said Russian U.N. Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya, addressing the U.S. delegation.

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

America’s influential decline was most evident in Donald Trump’s recent Jerusalem debacle, which saw the Trump administration issue stern threats to the entire world, warning they needed to vote in favor of Washington’s interests at the U.N. Most of the world chose to ignore those threats and gave the United States a giant “middle finger,” so to speak, voting overwhelmingly against the Trump administration.

[Fletch]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

Russia went even further, bringing up America’s own behavior and treatment of protesters as a counter-argument to the notion that Washington is motivated by human rights concerns in Iran.

“By your logic, we should have initiated a Security Council meeting after the well-known events in Ferguson,” said Russian U.N. Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya, addressing the U.S. delegation.

America’s influential decline was most evident in Donald Trump’s recent Jerusalem debacle, which saw the Trump administration issue stern threats to the entire world, warning they needed to vote in favor of Washington’s interests at the U.N. Most of the world chose to ignore those threats and gave the United States a giant “middle finger,” so to speak, voting overwhelmingly against the Trump administration.

I think Syria opened the world's eyes. The US had, had a clear run of regime changes up until then but Russia stepped in and proved far more effective, and with very good equipment, than anybody thought. The old 'rusty ancient Russian military' talk soon slipped away. The MSM still try to trot it out every now and then but on the whole, it's gone. The world saw the capabilities, and Russia hasn't revealed it's full capability, and took note. Allies were formed and the US moved further to the sidelines and exposed as being on the side of terrorists. They didn't even get invited to the latest talks.

[Maddog]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

Do you think I'm a fan of our foreign policy?

If so, you are an ignorant fuck who can't read.

Which is highly likely.

[Rolluplostinspace]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

Do you think I'm a fan of our foreign policy?

If so, you are an ignorant fuck who can't read.

Which is highly likely.

I think we must have finally got through to you because for years you were a staunch defender of it.

[Maddog]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

Do you think I'm a fan of our foreign policy?

If so, you are an ignorant fuck who can't read.

Which is highly likely.

I think we must have finally got through to you because for years you were a staunch defender of it.

No, I'm quite clear in my stance that our foreign policy is bad for the US. You and I disagree on why we do what we do. We agree that the US should mind it's own business.

You can't wrap your head around the concept that I think you and Fletch have mental issues, while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well.

Maybe this will help.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.

[Viper]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

Russia went even further, bringing up America’s own behavior and treatment of protesters as a counter-argument to the notion that Washington is motivated by human rights concerns in Iran.

“By your logic, we should have initiated a Security Council meeting after the well-known events in Ferguson,” said Russian U.N. Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya, addressing the U.S. delegation.

America’s influential decline was most evident in Donald Trump’s recent Jerusalem debacle, which saw the Trump administration issue stern threats to the entire world, warning they needed to vote in favor of Washington’s interests at the U.N. Most of the world chose to ignore those threats and gave the United States a giant “middle finger,” so to speak, voting overwhelmingly against the Trump administration.

I think Syria opened the world's eyes. The US had, had a clear run of regime changes up until then but Russia stepped in and proved far more effective, and with very good equipment, than anybody thought. The old 'rusty ancient Russian military' talk soon slipped away. The MSM still try to trot it out every now and then but on the whole, it's gone. The world saw the capabilities, and Russia hasn't revealed it's full capability, and took note. Allies were formed and the US moved further to the sidelines and exposed as being on the side of terrorists. They didn't even get invited to the latest talks.

Clearly you know fuck all about russian military capabilites.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 6.html?amp

As a country they have the stomach for a fight but it would bankrupt them.

So you are posing russia as a model britain should follow now are you feltch?

[Rolluplostinspace]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

Do you think I'm a fan of our foreign policy?

If so, you are an ignorant fuck who can't read.

Which is highly likely.

I think we must have finally got through to you because for years you were a staunch defender of it.

No, I'm quite clear in my stance that our foreign policy is bad for the US. You and I disagree on why we do what we do. We agree that the US should mind it's own business.

You can't wrap your head around the concept that I think you and Fletch have mental issues, while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well.

Maybe this will help.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.

A completely new approach from you.
In all these years you've never said anything remotely like this.

[Fletch]

No, I'm quite clear in my stance that our foreign policy is bad for the US. You and I disagree on why we do what we do. We agree that the US should mind it's own business.

You can't wrap your head around the concept that I think you and Fletch have mental issues, while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well.

Maybe this will help.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.

We're nuts but you present that as a reflection of US policy?

"while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well".

You for real? Fuck serving your citizens well, it's the well-being of other citizens around the world who are getting killed, maimed and scarred that is the issue.

Your only gripe is how much it costs and wish it was spent on the US.

[Maddog]

"The Whole World Is Sick And Tired Of US Foreign Policy"



While Washington is more than capable of unilaterally attacking other countries both covertly and overtly with an ever depleting list of allies, what is becoming increasingly clear is that it may not be able to do so without active opposition from the rest of the world..."

Google.com/2018-01- ... ign-policy

http://theantimedia.org/whole-world-tir ... gn-policy/

In case maddog doesn't get it yet.

Do you think I'm a fan of our foreign policy?

If so, you are an ignorant fuck who can't read.

Which is highly likely.

I think we must have finally got through to you because for years you were a staunch defender of it.

No, I'm quite clear in my stance that our foreign policy is bad for the US. You and I disagree on why we do what we do. We agree that the US should mind it's own business.

You can't wrap your head around the concept that I think you and Fletch have mental issues, while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well.

Maybe this will help.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.

A completely new approach from you.
In all these years you've never said anything remotely like this.

That's the US Libertarian party platform, and I have said that numerous times.

You're head is too far up your ass to bother listening.

[Maddog]

No, I'm quite clear in my stance that our foreign policy is bad for the US. You and I disagree on why we do what we do. We agree that the US should mind it's own business.

You can't wrap your head around the concept that I think you and Fletch have mental issues, while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well.

Maybe this will help.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.

We're nuts but you present that as a reflection of US policy?

"while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well".

You for real? Fuck serving your citizens well, it's the well-being of other citizens around the world who are getting killed, maimed and scarred that is the issue.

Your only gripe is how much it costs and wish it was spent on the US.

My concern is primarily with the US citizens. That's who are government is supposed to serve.

And you are correct. I'm not a virtue signaler like you and frankly, I find you laughable and useless.

[Fletch]

We're nuts but you present that as a reflection of US policy?

"while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well".

You for real? Fuck serving your citizens well, it's the well-being of other citizens around the world who are getting killed, maimed and scarred that is the issue.

Your only gripe is how much it costs and wish it was spent on the US.

My concern is primarily with the US citizens. That's who are government is supposed to serve.

And you are correct. I'm not a virtue signaler like you and frankly, I find you laughable and useless.

Our

[Maddog]

We're nuts but you present that as a reflection of US policy?

"while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well".

You for real? Fuck serving your citizens well, it's the well-being of other citizens around the world who are getting killed, maimed and scarred that is the issue.

Your only gripe is how much it costs and wish it was spent on the US.

My concern is primarily with the US citizens. That's who are government is supposed to serve.

And you are correct. I'm not a virtue signaler like you and frankly, I find you laughable and useless.

Our

Good catch!

[Guest]

No, I'm quite clear in my stance that our foreign policy is bad for the US. You and I disagree on why we do what we do. We agree that the US should mind it's own business.

You can't wrap your head around the concept that I think you and Fletch have mental issues, while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well.

Maybe this will help.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.

We're nuts but you present that as a reflection of US policy?

"while I also think the US has bad foreign policy that does not serve it's citizens well".

You for real? Fuck serving your citizens well, it's the well-being of other citizens around the world who are getting killed, maimed and scarred that is the issue.

Your only gripe is how much it costs and wish it was spent on the US.

My concern is primarily with the US citizens. That's who are government is supposed to serve.

And you are correct. I'm not a virtue signaler like you and frankly, I find you laughable and useless.

That's a truly pathetic answer, and not just because of the poor spelling and grammar.

Are you really shallow and stupid enough to think that way or is this one of those comments you pull out of your ass when you've been shown up as being on the same level as a sophomore in high school?

Since you're determined to sound like an ignorant schoolboy let's treat you like one and give you some homework

In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence, frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations, has been the victim.

In under 500 words but showing your rationale and citing precedent place this extract from George Washington's farewell address into the context of America involvement in the Middle East and Iran.

That's something I would expect a middle school student to complete in about an hour.